Contreras CCR, Ccoicca HFJ, Atencio PJI, Paucar HW, Sedano MCJ

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 469.38 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Scientific publication by thesis advisors is a cornerstone of research.
Objective: To assess the frequency of scientific publication corresponding to thesis advisors of a Medical School at the National University of Huancayo, Peru.
Methods: Cross-sectional and observational study, in which the curriculum vitae of 31 teachers who were thesis advisors between 2008 and 2018 was reviewed by the National Council of Science, Technology and Technological Innovation of Peru. In addition, the search was carried out of his articles through Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, Medline, Scielo and ORCID, in view of determining the frequencies and percentages of the following variables: if the advisor published at least once and if that person was ever a corresponding author of a research article.
Results: 45.2% of the professors were registered and their entries yielded at least one research work within the National Council of Science, Technology and Technological Innovation of Peru. 35.5% had research projects once in their life, while 9.7% presented a qualification of "responsible conduct in research" and 3.2% of "researcher". Through bibliometric search, we determined the existence of 56 articles, of which 64.3% were original articles and 72.2% appeared in national journals. Of the professors who had publications, 58% coincided with authors who published an article and 10% made their work known through Scopus or Medline, within the last two years. 26% published an original article at some time in their life; 7%, an original article in Scielo or Scopus/Medline, within the last 2 years; and, finally, as corresponding author, 32% published an article in their entire lifetime: 16% published an original article and 3% did so in the last two years of the study period.
Conclusions: Scientific publication by thesis advisors is very low. Only half of them have published, at least once in their lives, a scientific article.

REFERENCES

1. SUNEDU. Informe Bienal sobre la realidad Universitaria. Lima. 2017 [acceso 05/07/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.sunedu.gob.pe/informe-bienal-sobre-realidad-universitaria/

2. Miyahira J. ¿Por qué la tasa de publicación de las tesis en Medicina es baja?: Posibles explicaciones. Rev Medica Hered. 2015;26(4):207-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v26i4.2698

3. Pereyra-Elías R, Huaccho-Rojas J, Taype-Rondan A, Mejia C, Mayta-Tristán P. Publicación y factores asociados en docentes universitarios de investigación científica de escuelas de medicina del Perú. Rev Perú Med Exp Salud Pública. 2014 [acceso 05/07/2019];31(3):424-30. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rins/v31n3/a03v31n3.pdf

4. Alarcon-Ruiz C, Quezada MA. Publicación de artículos científicos por asesores de tesis de una Facultad de Medicina. Rev Medica Hered. 2018;29(3):152-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v29i3.3403

5. Atamari-Anahui N, Sucasaca-Rodríguez C, Marroquin-Santa Cruz J. Publicación científica de asesores de tesis de pregrado en una escuela de medicina de Cusco, Perú. Investig En Educ Médica. 2016 [acceso 05/07/2019];5(20):279-80. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rmh/v26n4/a03v26n4.pdf

6. Supo J. Seminarios de Investigación Científica: Metodología de la Investigación para las Ciencias de la Salud. 2 Ed. Arequipa: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 2014 [acceso 05/07/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08BWFKWLB/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0

7. Supo J. Cómo elegir una muestra: Técnicas para seleccionar una muestra representativa. 1 Ed. Arequipa: Bioestadistico; 2013 [acceso 05/07/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08BWFKWLB/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0

8. Munive J. Calidad de tesis para obtener el título de médico cirujano de la Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, 2007-2016. Tesis para optar el título de médico cirujano. Huancayo. 2018 [acceso 20/06/2019]. Disponible en: http://repositorio.uncp.edu.pe/handle/UNCP/4357

9. Concytec. Manual Reglamento de Calificaciones-REGINA. 2019 [acceso 05/07/2019]. Editorial- Instituto de investigación científica Perú. Disponible en: https://dina.concytec.gob.pe/appDirectorioCTI/index_guiaRegina.jsp

10. Yagui M, Espinoza M, Caballero P, Castilla T, Garro G, Yamaguchi L, et al. Avances y retos en la construcción del sistema nacional de investigación en salud en el Perú. Rev Perú Med Exp Salud Pública. 2010 [acceso 05/07/2019];27:387-97. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rins/v27n3/a12v27n3.pdf

11. Huamaní C, Chávez-Solis P, Mayta-Tristán P. Aporte estudiantil en la publicación de artículos científicos en revistas médicas indizadas en Scielo-Perú, 1997-2005. An Fac Med. 2008 [acceso 05/07/2019];69(1):42-5. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/afm/v69n1/a09v69n1.pdf

12. Brown CJ. Unvarnished viewpoints and scientific scrutiny. Letter to the editor provide a forum for readers and help make a journal accountable to the medical community. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can. 1997 [acceso 05/07/2019];157(6):792-4. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1228140/pdf/cmaj_157_6_792.pdf

13. Taype-Rondán A, Huaccho-Rojas J, Pereyra-Elías R, Mejía C, Mayta-Tristán P. Características de los cursos de investigación en escuelas de medicina del Perú. Arch Med. 2015 [acceso 05/07/2019];11(2):1. Disponible en: https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/10757/555579/caractersticascursos.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

14. Mejia C, Cáceres O, Vera C, Inga-Berrospi F, Mayta-Tristán P. Percepción y factores asociados a insatisfacción que los médicos recién graduados tienen de sus asesores de tesis, Lima-Perú. Educ Médica Super. 2016 Dic [acceso 05/07/2019];30(4):340-8. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ems/v30n4/ems10416.pdf