medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa REVMEDUAS

ISSN 2007-8013 (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med UAS 2021; 11 (2)

Quantification of lamellar bodies in amniotic fluid by aspiration of gastric juice to determine respiratory distress syndrome in newborns

Navarro-Romero A, Martínez-Félix NS, Peraza-Garay FJ, Soto-Castellanos IA, García-Vázquez RA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 124-135
PDF size: 201.94 Kb.


Key words:

lamellar bodies, newborns, respiratory distress syndrome.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Determine the number of lamellar bodies (LB) in newborns (NB) with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Material and methods: Prospective, descriptive study, diagnostic test. All NB delivered in the Civil Hospital of Culiacán were included in the period from April 1, 2018 to November 30, 2020, samples of amniotic fluid were obtained by gastric juice aspiration by placing an gastric gavage during the first 45 minutes of life, the determination of LB was carried out by means of a hematological cell counter through the platelet channel, (SYSMEX model XE-2100) to determine RDS in NB. Results. 343 samples of amniotic fluid obtained by gastric juice aspiration were analyzed, of which 54.5% (n = 187) were male and 45.5% (n = 156) female. Of the total, 76 were premature (RNPT) and 267 term (RNT). 138 NBs presented RDS, 42.8% (n = 59) were RNPT and 57.2% (n = 79) were RNT. In the NBs who presented RDS with the SILVERMAN ANDERSON (SA) scale, a significant association was observed for the diagnosis of RDS. Median LB counts between preterm and term were significantly different (p = .005). The median for RNT was 82.0 (95% CI 68, 100) and for RNPT 43.5 (95% CI 33.97,67.07). In the newborns with RDS, the RNPT had a significantly lower LB count (p = .000) with a median 40 (95% CI 31.5, 62) than the RNT with a median 99 (95% CI 74, 166). A significant relationship (p = .000) was observed between the LB count and the SA scale, higher values on the SA scale corresponded to a lower LB count. The cut-off point was estimated at 81,500 CL in RNPT, with a sensitivity of 72.9% and a specificity of 52.9% for the presence of RDS, with PPV of 84.3% and NPV of 36%. Of the patients who presented RDS, 15 required application of exogenous surfactant, 14 of them were premature, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation in 8 of these patients. Conclusions. The CL count in amniotic fluid is a promising, quick and simple test for predicting RDS, but the simple quantification of CL is not by itself sensitive and specific to determine the presence of the disease, however, including the association of the SA scale, it was observed that the lower the amount of CL, the higher its score to produce the disease.


REFERENCES

  1. Guillén Mayorga DL, Rodríguez E, Ortiz JA,Rivera WI, Hernández Duarte N. Perfil epidemiológicoy factores de riesgo en reciennacidos prematuros, Hospital Regional, Gracias,Lempira. Rev Med Hondur. 2012;80(4):145-52.

  2. Mendoza LA, Claros DI, Mendoza LI, GuatibonzaA, Deyfilia M, Peñaranda CB. Epidemiologíade la prematuridad, sus determinantesy prevención del parto prematuro.Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2016; 81(4):330-42.

  3. Murphy SL, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, MinkovitzCS, Strobino DM. Annual summary of vitalstatistics: 2013–2014. Pediatrics.2017;139 (6):e20163239.

  4. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ,Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National,regional, and worldwide estimates of pretermbirth rates in the year 2010 with timetrends since 1990 for selected countries: asystematic analysis and implications. Thelancet. 2012; 379: 2162-72.

  5. Pérez R, López CR, Rodríguez A. Morbilidady mortalidad del recién nacido prematuro enel Hospital General de Irapuato. Bol MedHosp Infant Mex. 2013;70(4):299-305.

  6. Ejaz I, Bharo MA, Anwer M. respiratory distresssyndrome in preterm neonates oflahore. Hamdan Med J. 2013;212(1206):1-5.

  7. Verma RP. Respiratory distress syndrome ofthe newborn infant. Obstet Gynecol Surv1995;50(7):542-55.

  8. Schittny JC. Development of the lung. CellTissue Res. 2017; 367(3):427-44.

  9. Ruiz-Parra AI, Muñoz L, Ome L. Composicióndel surfactante, desarrollo pulmonar ypruebas de maduración en el feto. MedicinaAc. Col. 2010;32(1):47-59.

  10. Salinas FC, Fernández DE, Laso AG, HernandoJM, Lozano GB, Muñoz MG, et al. Recomendacionespara la asistencia respiratoriaen el recién nacido (III). Surfactante yóxido nítrico. An Pediatr 2015;83(5):354.e1-354.e6

  11. Reuter S, Moser C, Baack M. Respiratorydistress in the newborn. Pediatr Rev.2014;35(10):417- 429.

  12. Halliday HL. Surfactants: past, present andfuture. J Perinatol. 2008; 28: S47-56.

  13. Tsuda H, Kotani T, Nakano T, Imai K, UshidaT, Hirakawa A, et al. The rate of neonatalrespiratory distress syndrome/transient tachypneain the newborn and the amniotic lamellarbody count in twin pregnancies comparedwith singleton pregnancies. Clin ChimActa. 2018; 484:293-297.

  14. Štimac T, Petrović O, Krajina R, Prodan M,Bilić-Zulle L. Lamellar body count as a diagnostictest in predicting neonatal respiratorydistress syndrome. Croat Med J.2012;53(3):234-8.

  15. Verder H, Ebbesen F, Brandt J, Dahl M, EsbergG, Eschen C, et al. Lamellar bodycounts on gastric aspirates for prediction ofrespiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr.2011, 100: 75-180.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med UAS. 2021;11