Hottois G

Language: Spanish
References: 4
Page: 104-115
PDF size: 165.10 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Pacification and reconciliation are different notions and processes. Even if it is true that reconciliation requires pacification, the contrary is not the case. A deeper cognitive and emotional evolution may develop a certain understanding, even perhaps a mutual respect towards the possibility of a facilitated reconciliation, sometimes, for the dream of a return to the prior harmony. This is why stories are very important. I intend to work around a notion closely related to philosophy: the notion of wisdom. Wisdom and peace are concepts not far from one another. I will examine what wisdom might mean today, in a world so far from that from which it was born.

REFERENCES

1. CANGUILHEM, G. (1971). Lo normal y lo patológico.Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, Argentina Editores S.A.

2. MUZUR, A., & SASS, H. M. (Eds.). (2012). Fritz Jahrand the Foundations of Global Bioethics: The Future ofIntegrative Bioethics. Munster: Lit Verlag.

3. POTTER, V. R. (1971). Bioethics. Bridge to the future.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

4. POTTER, V. R. (1988). Global Bioethics: building onthe Leopold Legacy. East Lansing, Michigan: MichiganState University Press.