Garcia SHD, Sancio LRA, Leporati MJL

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 627-648
PDF size: 408.83 Kb.

ABSTRACT

This research sought to verify the psychometric properties of the Motivation and Learning Strategies Questionnaire (Short form) through an intentional sample of 180 university students who are studying Speech Therapy and Special Education at the National University of San Luis, Argentina. It was an instrumental study and whose first results yielded adequate reliability indices for the Learning Strategies construct, although for Motivation, the Cronbach's Alpha values noted some inconsistency in its structure. The exploratory factor analysis allowed the extraction of two components for Motivation and seven for Learning Strategies, also corroborating that, in the constitution of each factor, the grouping of the items differed significantly from the original version studied. These results suggest a questionable validity of construct and content on the part of the instrument, which aims to reject its use in this population, and invokes the need for further studies to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the full version in our population.

REFERENCES

1. Argimón Pallas JM., y Jimenez Vila J. (2006). Métodos de investigación clínica yepidemiologica. 3a ed. Madrid: Ediciones Harcourt.

2. Ayatollahi, M. A., Rasekh, A. E. y Tavakoli, M. (2011). A Confirmatory FactorAnalysis of Motivated Self-regulated Learning Questionnaire in an EFLContext. International Education Studies, 4(4), 230-241.

3. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R. y Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

4. Brown, J. D., Cunha, M. I. A., y Frota, S. de F. N. (2001). The development andvalidation of a Portuguese version of the Motivated Strategies for LearningQuestionnaire. In Z. Dörnyei y R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and secondlanguage acquisition (pp. 257-280). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teachingy Curriculum Center, University of Hawai‘i Press.

5. Credé, M., y Phillips, L. A. (2011). A metaanalytic review of the MotivatedStrategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences,21, 337-346.

6. Curione, K. y Huertas, J. A. (2016). Motivated Strategies for LearningQuestionnaire: twenty-five years of motivational evaluation. Revista dePsicología, 12(24), 55-67.

7. Erturan Ilker, G., Arslan, Y. y Demirhan, G. (2014). A Validity and Reliability Studyof the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Sciences:Theory Practice, 14(3), 829-833.

8. García, T., McKeachie y Wilbert, J. (1988). Reliability and Predictive Validity of theMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire –MSLQ [Resumen].Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813

9. García, T., McKeachie y Wilbert, J. (1988). Reliability and Predictive Validity of theMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire–MSLQ. Educational andPsychologicalMeasurement, 53, 3, 801-813.

10. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, Y. L. (2017). Propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario demotivación y estrategias de aprendizaje forma corta en estudiantesuniversitarios del distrito de Trujillo. Tesis de grado. Facultad dehumanidades. Escuela académico profesional de psicología. UniversidadCésar Vallejo.

11. Hernandez-Nieto, R. (2011) Instrumentos de recolección de datos en cienciassociales y ciencias biomédicas. Caracas: Universidad de los Andes.

12. Magno, C. (2011). Validating the Academic Selfregulated Learning Scale with theMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) and Learning andStudy Strategies Inventory (LASSI). The International Journal Of Educationaland Psychological Assessment, 7(2), 56-73.

13. Muis, K. R., Winne, P. H., y Jamieson-Noel, D. (2007). Using a multitraitmultimethodanalysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulatedlearning inventories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 177-195

14. Namakforoosh, M. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación. México D.F.: EditorialLimusa S.A,

15. Pintrich, P., McKeachi, W., Smith, D., Doljanac, R., Lin, Y., Naveh-Benjamin, M.,Crooks, T. y Karabenick, S. (1988). Motivated strategies for learningquestionnaire. Michigan: The University of Michigan.

16. Prieto G. y Delgado A. (2010). Fiabilidad y validez. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 1,67-74.

17. Ramírez, M.C., Canto, J. E., Bueno, J. A. y Echazarreta, A. (2013). PsychometricValidation of the Motivated Learning Strategies for Learning Questionnaire,with Mexican University Students. Electronic Journal of Research inEducational Psychology, 11(1), 193–214

18. Roces, C., Touron J. y González-Torres, M. C. (1995). Validación preliminar delCEAM II (Cuestionario de Estrategias de Aprendizaje y Motivación II),Psicológica, 16(3), 347-366.

19. Sabogal, L.; Barraza, E.; Hernández, A. y Zapata, L. (2011). Validación delcuestionario de motivación y estrategias de aprendizaje forma corta –MSLQSF, en estudiantes universitarios de una institución pública-Santa Marta.Revista Psicogente, 14, 25, 36-50.

20. Sireci, S. G. (2003). Validity content. En R. F. Ballesteros (Ed.). Encyclopedia ofpsychological assessment. Londres, UK: Sage.

21. Somtsewu, N. (2008). The Applicability of the Motivated Strategies for LearningQuestionnaire (MSLQ) for South Africa. Faculty of Health Sciences at theNelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa.

22. Waltz C., Strikland O. y Lenz E. (2010). Measurement in Nursing and HealthResearch. 4th Ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company.