medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Colombiana de Bioética

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Colombiana de Bioética 2022; 17 (1)

Precision medicine and transhumanism: A bioethical perspective

Kottow M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page:
PDF size: 147.94 Kb.


Key words:

Bioethics, Artificial intelligence, commodification, digitalization, human body, precision medicine, transhumanism.

ABSTRACT

Purpose/Background. To present the concatenation of medical digitalization that unravels from the goal of therapeutic improvement through precision medicine and moves on to enhancement medicine beyond the normal function and form of the human body in order to reach the final purpose of creating transhuman beings.
Methodology/Approach. To select papers that discuss research and eventual practical applications of precision medicine and encourage the possible development of transhumanism through the progression of biomedical enhancement procedures.
Results/Findings. Both precision medicine and transhumanism have nourished public expectations for more effective therapies, and the possibilities of functional enhancement in the areas of cognition and ethics. Research has poured huge resources in anticipation of products allowing for lucrative marketing.
Discussion/Conclusions/Contributions. Given the incertitude, excessive expectations and vested interests that play a large part in biomedical digitalization, bioethics has been unable to generate a robust debate on these matters. Some inevitable consequences need to be addressed: Unequal access and the negative effects of biotechnological expansion, have a destabilizing impact on adaptation between humans, nonhuman living beings and global environment. It is urgent to call attention about the huge amounts of resources poured into sophisticated biomedical research to the detriment of the ensuing social and ethical problems.


REFERENCES

  1. André, Arthur y Jean-Jacques Vignaux. 2019. “Precision medicine.” En Digital Medicine,editado por Arthur André, 49-58. París: Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98216-8_5

  2. Bostrom, Nick. 2013. “Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority.” Global Policy4, no. 1: 15-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12002

  3. Char, Danton, Nigam Shah y David Magnus. 2018. “Implementing machine learningin health care—addressing ethical challenges.” New England Journal of Medicine378, no. 11: 981-983. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229

  4. Collins, Francis y Harold Varmus. 2015. “A New Initiative on Precision Medicine.”The New England Journal of Medicine 379, no. 9: 793-795. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1500523

  5. Day, Sophie, Charles Coombes, Louise McGrath-Lone, Claudia Schoenborn y HelenWard. 2017. “Stratified, precision or personalized medicine? Cancer servicesin the ‘real world’ of a London hospital.” Sociology of Health & Disease 39, no.1: 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12457

  6. de Sousa, Boaventura. 2021. El futuro comienza ahora. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.

  7. De Waal, Alex. 2021. New Pandemics, old politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  8. Galas, David y Leroy Hood. 2009. “Systems Biology and Emerging TechnologiesWill Catalyze the Transition from Reactive Medicine to Predictive, Personalized,Preventive and Participatory (P4) Medicine.” IBC 1, no. 2: 6.1-6.4. https://doi.org/10.4051/ibc.2009.2.0006

  9. García, José. 2013. “Bioética personalista y bioética principialista. Perspectivas.”Cuadernos de Bioética XXIV, no. 1: 67-76.

  10. Goldenberg, Maya. 2005. “Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice andthe “empirical turn” from normative bioethics.” BMC Medical Ethics 6, no. 11.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-6-11

  11. Greely, Henry. 2006. “Neurethics and ELSI: Similaities and Differnces.” The MinnesotaJournal of Law, Science & Technology 7, no. 2: 599-637.

  12. Han, Byun-Chul. 2014. Psicopolítica. Barcelona: Herder.

  13. Hughes, James. 2010. “Contradictions from the Enlightment Roots of Transhumanism.”Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35: 622-640. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq049

  14. Iriart, Jorge. 2019. “Precision medicine/personalized medicine: a critical analysisof movements in the transformation of biomedicine in the early 21st century.”Cad. Saúde Pública 35, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00153118

  15. Juengst, Eric, Richard Settersten, Jennifer Fishman y Michelle McGowan. 2012.“After the Revolution? Ethical and Social Challenges in ‘Personalized GenomicMedicine’.” Personalized Medicine 9, no. 4: 429-439. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.12.37

  16. Keating, Peter y Alberto Cambrosio. 2003. Biomdeical Platforms. Londres: The MIT Press.

  17. Khoury, Muin, Michael Iademarco y William Riley. 2016. “Precision Public Healthfor the Era of Precision Medicine.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 50,no. 3: 398-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.031

  18. Kirchoffer, David. 2017. “Human Dignity and Human Enhancement: A MultidimensionalApproach.” Bioethics 31, no. 5: 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12343

  19. Maughan, Tim. 2017. “The Promise and the Hype of ‘Personalised Medicine’.” TheNew Bioethics 23, no. 1: 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2017.1314886

  20. More, Max. 1990. Transhumanism. Towards a Futurist Philosophy. Recuperado de https://www.ildodopensiero.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/max-more-transhumanism-towards-a-futurist-philosophy.pdf

  21. Persson, Ingmar y Julian Savulescu. 2014. Unfit for the Future. The Need for MoralEnhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  22. Porter, Allen. 2017. “Bioethics and Transhumanism.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy42: 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhx001

  23. Royakkers, Lambèr, Jelte Timmer, Linda Kool, y Rinie van Est. 2018. “Societal andethical issues in digitalization.” Ethics and Information Technology 20: 127-142.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9452-x

  24. Sadin, Éric. 2018. L’Íntelligence artficielle ou l’enjeu du siècle. París: Éditions Léchapéee.

  25. Sebag, Valérie. 2007. Droit et bioéthique. Bruselas: Larcier.

  26. Sgreccia, Elio. 2013. “Persona humana y personalismo.” Cuadernos de BioéticaXXIV, no. 1: 115-123.

  27. Stengers, Isabelle. 2013. Une autre science es posible! París: La Découverte.

  28. Sturdy, Steve. 2017. “Personalised Medicine and the Economy of BiotechnologicalPromise.” The New Bioethics 23, no. 1: 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2017.1314892

  29. ten Have, Henk. 2012. “Potter’s Notion of Bioethics.” Kennedy Institute of EthicsJournal 22, no. 1: 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2012.0003

  30. Toombs, Kay. 1987. “The meaning of illness: A phenomenological approach tothe patient-physician relationship.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12, no. 3:219-240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/12.3.219

  31. Vidal, María, Ileana del Rosario Morales Suárez, José Alberto Menéndez Bravo, LiliaGonzález Cárdenas y Miriam Portuondo Sao. 2020. “Medicina de precisiónpersonalizada.” Revista Cubana Educación Médica Superior, 34, no. 1.

  32. Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism. Londres: Profile Books Ltd.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Colombiana de Bioética. 2022;17