medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz

2022, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2022; 45 (6)

Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Appraisal Inventory for Patients with Chronic Pain in Mexican population

Barrientos CV, Riveros RA, González-Forteza C, Robles GR

Language: English
References: 27
Page: 277-282
PDF size: 240.14 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction. Cognitive assessment is the process whereby individuals assess the effect an adverse circumstance has on their well-being (primary assessment) and their ability to cope with it (secondary assessment), which is closely related to the emotional and behavioral response they show as a result. Objective. To determine the validity and internal consistency of the Spanish version of the Cognitive Assessment Inventory (CAI) for patients with chronic pain for Mexican population. Method. A total of 191 adults with chronic pain completed the Spanish version of the CAI, as well as self-report measures of disability, daily activities, anxiety, and depression. Results. The confirmatory factor analysis for each type of primary cognitive assessment included in the CAI yielded models with satisfactory goodness of fit and Cronbach’s α indices (loss/damage: CMIN/DF = 1.132, NFI = .935, CFI = .992, AGFI = .939, SRMR = .046, RMSEA = .026, α = .73; threat: CMIN/ DF = 1.132, NFI = .935, CFI = .992, AGFI = .939, SRMR = .046, RMSEA = .026, α = .81; and challenge: CMIN/ DF = 1.567, NFI = .939, CFI = .977, AGFI = .926, SRMR = .044, RMSEA = .055, α = .86). Cognitive assessments of loss/harm and threat were positively associated with the degree of disability, depression, and anxiety, and negatively associated with the performance of daily activities. The opposite occurred with the cognitive assessment of challenge. Discussion and conclusion. The Spanish version of the CAI is a valid, quick, easy, and reliable tool for evaluating the primary cognitive assessment of pain, a construct closely related to physical disability and emotional suffering in response to this experience, which may be modified through brief cognitive interventions.


REFERENCES

  1. Ahmad, M. M. (2005). Psychometric evaluation of the Cognitive Appraisal of HealthScale with patients with prostate cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(1),78-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03266.x

  2. Camacho, L., Anarte M. T., & Ramírez-Maestre, C. (2002). Variables cognitivas yestados de ánimo relacionados con el dolor crónico en pacientes de diferentesservicios médicos. Revista de Psicología de la Salud, 14(2), 3-17.

  3. Craig, K. D. (1984). Psychology of pain. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 60, 835-840. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.60.710.835

  4. Cunningham, A. J. (2000). Adjuvant psychological therapy for cancer patients:putting it on the same footing as adjunctive medical therapies. Psycho‐Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social and Behavioral Dimensions ofCancer, 9(5), 367-371. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200009/10)9:53.0.co;2-i

  5. Dalton, J. A., Feuerstein, M., Carlson, J., & Roghman, K. (1994) Biobehavioralpain profile: development and psychometric properties. Pain, 57, 95-107. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90113-9

  6. Dehghani, M., Sharpe, L., & Nicholas, M. K. (2003). Selective attention to painrelatedinformation in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. Pain, 105(1-2),37-46. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00224-0

  7. Esteve, R., Ramírez-Maestre, C., & López-Marínez, A. E. (2007). Adjustmentto Chronic Pain: The Role of Pain Acceptance, Coping Strategies, and Pain-Related Cognitions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(2), 179-188. doi:10.1007/BF02879899

  8. Fuentes, J. P. (2020). Versión actualizada de la definición de dolor de la IASP: un pasoadelante o un paso atrás. Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor, 27(4), 232-233. doi: 10.20986/resed.2020.3839/2020

  9. Herrero, A. M., Ramírez-Maestre, C., & González, V. (2008). Personality, cognitiveappraisal and adjustment in chronic pain patients. The Spanish Journal ofPsychology, 11(2), 531-541. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600004534

  10. Herrmann, C. (1997). International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety andDepression Scale - A review of validation data and clinical results. Journal ofPsychosomatic Research, 42(1), 17-41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00216-4

  11. IASP Subcommittee on Taxonomy. (1979). Pain terms: a list with definitions andnotes on usage. Recommended by the IASP Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain,6(3), 249-252.

  12. Janowski, K., Steuden, S., & Kuryłowicz, J. (2010). Factors accounting forpsychosocial functioning in patients with low back pain. European SpineJournal, 19(4), 613-623. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1151-1

  13. Katz, J., Rosembloom, B. N., & Fashler, S. (2015). Chronic Pain, Psychopathology,and DSM-5 Somatic Symptom Disorder. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,60(4), 160-167. doi: 10.1177/070674371506000402

  14. Kerns, R. D., Turk, D. C., & Rudy, T. E. (1985). The West Heaven-YaleMultidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain, 23(4), 345-356. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1

  15. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York:Springer.

  16. Lazarus, R. S., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Knowledge and appraisal in the cognitionemotionrelationship. Cognition and Emotion, 2(4), 281-300. doi:10.1080/02699938808412701

  17. López-Alvarenga, J. C., Vázquez-Velázquez, V., Arcila Martínez, D., SierraOvando, A. E., González Barranco, J., & Salín Pascual, R. J. (2002). Exactitudy utilidad diagnóstica del Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) enuna muestra de sujetos obesos mexicanos. Revista de Investigación Clínica,54(5), 403-409.

  18. Meade, C. S., Wang, J., Lin, X., Wu, H., & Poppen, P. J. (2010). Stress and Copingin HIV-Positive Former Plasma/Blood Donors in China: A Test of CognitiveAppraisal Theory. AIDS and Behavior, 14(2), 328-338. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9494-x

  19. Pergolizzi, J., Ahlbeck, K., Aldington, D., Alon, E., Coluzzi, F., Dahan, A., ...Varrassi, G. (2013). The development of chronic pain: physiological CHANGEnecessitates a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Current MedicalResearch and Opinion, 29(9), 1127-1135. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.810615

  20. Raja, S. N., Carr, D. B., Cohen, M., Finnerup, N. B., Flor, H., Gibson, S., ... Vader,K. (2020). The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definitionof pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain, 161(9), 1976-1982. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939

  21. Ramírez Maestre, C., Esteve Zarazagay, M. R., & López Martínez, A. E. (2008).Desarrollo de un inventario para la evaluación cognitiva en pacientes con dolorcrónico. Psicología Conductual, 16(1), 55-68.

  22. Ramírez-Maestre, C., Esteve, R., & López, A. E. (2008). Cognitive appraisal andcoping in chronic pain patients. European Journal of Pain, 12(6),749-756. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.11.004

  23. Schopflocher, D., Taenzer, P., & Jovey, R. (2011). The prevalence of chronicpain in Canada. Pain Research and Management, 16(6), 445-450. doi:10.1155/2011/876306

  24. Sheehan, D. V., Harnett-Sheehan, K., & Raj, B. A. (1996). The measurement ofdisability. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(3), 89-95. doi:10.1097/00004850-199606003-00015

  25. Tsang, A. Von Korff, M. Lee, S., Alonso, J., Karam, E., Angermeyer, M. C., …Watanabe, M. (2008). Common chronic pain conditions in developed anddeveloping countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity withdepression-anxiety disorders. The Journal of Pain, 9(10), 883-891. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.05.005

  26. Turk, D. C., & Okifuji, A. (2003). Pain Management. En I. B. Weiner (Ed.). Handbookof Psychology. Volume 9: Health Psychology (pp. 293-337). New Jersey: Wiley.

  27. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depressionscale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361-370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com