Vázquez-Gómez LA, Hidalgo MC, Beltrán GBM, Broche-Pérez Y, Mederos-Herrera AM

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 58-74
PDF size: 160.37 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: health promotion is recognized as a way to achieve desirable levels of health for all humanity. Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating inflammatory disease of the central nervous system of an autoimmune nature.
Objective: to determine the effectiveness of a strategy for the multidisciplinary follow-up to patients with multiple sclerosis aimed at increasing their quality of life.
Methods: a quasi-experimental study with a before-after design was carried out with a single group in the Neurology Service of the "Arnaldo Milián Castro" Clinical-Surgical University Hospital of Santa Clara, in the province of Villa Clara, in the period from May 2017 to May 2019. Theoretical methods were used: analysis-synthesis, induction-deduction and historical-logical; empirical ones: the individual application of the questionnaire of the Perceived Quality of Life Scale and mathematical-statistical for the analysis of the data found.
Results: all patients modified their perceived quality of life status in the components: sexual satisfaction scale, visual scale, bowel control, impact of pain and physical state towards better scores after applying the strategy. Most of the indicators evaluated by the team work offered very adequate evaluation results on the interventional process.
Conclusions: the follow-up strategy for patients with multiple sclerosis enabled a higher perceived quality of life in them; its effectiveness is given by the achievement of satisfactory modifications in the score of the perceived quality of life scale in all its components; as well as the indicators evaluated by the team work offer very adequate evaluation results.

REFERENCES

1. Carvajal Rodríguez C, López Gómez AB, Torres Cueto GM, Castro Alegret PL, Ramírez Pelaéz GD, Pérez Rodríguez M, et al. La formación de promotores estudiantiles en las UCP: Una herramienta para la preparación de docentes en el trabajo de promoción de la salud en S.N.E. La Habana: Mined; 2013.

2. Garner Cruz O, Donaire A, Ramírez Berlioz A, Wagner S, Rivera VM. Esclerosis múltiple: una revisión; el desafío en Honduras. Rev Med Hondur [Internet]. 2015 [citado 29/05/2019];83(1):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.bvs.hn/RMH/pdf/2015/pdf/Vol83-1-2-2015-16.pdf

3. Bravo González F, Álvarez Roldán A. Esclerosis múltiple, pérdida de funcionalidad y género. Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2019 [citado 20/05/2019];33(2):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.gacetasanitaria.org/es-esclerosis-multiple-perdida-funcionalidad-genero-articulo-S0213911117302662

4. Cabrera Gómez JC, Santana Capote E, Vals O, Casanova M, Alfaro I, González Quevedo A. Caracterización clínica de pacientes con esclerosis múltiple definida en Cuba. Rev Neurol [Internet]. 1998 [citado 19/04/2019];26(153):[aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/13649254

5. Sánchez JI. El diseño metodológico de las investigaciones evaluativas relacionadas con la calidad en salud. MediSan [Internet]. 2016 [citado 24/03/2019];20(4):[aprox. 2 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=65186

6. Castellano del Castillo MA, Lacasa Andrade ME, Hijós Bitrián E, Mambrona Girón L, Sebastiá Vigatá E, Vázquez Sasot A. Efectividad de la rehabilitación en la esclerosis múltiple. Rehabilitación [Internet]. 2014 [citado 19/06/2019];48(1):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalkey.es/service/content/pdf/watermarked/1-s2.0 S0048712013000431.pdf?locale=es_ES

7. Nedeljkovic U, Dackovic J, Tepavcevic DK, Basuroski ID, Mesaros S, Pekmezovic T, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation and steroids in the management of multiple sclerosis relapses: a randomized controlled trial. J Arch Med Sci [Internet]. 2016 [citado 19/06/2019];12(2):[aprox.10 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848347/pdf/AMS-12-24069.pdf

8. Cohen ET, Potter K, Allen DD, Bennett SE, Brandfass KG, Widener GL, et al. Selecting Rehabilitation Outcome Measures for People with Multiple Sclerosis. Int J MS Care [Internet]. 2015 [citado 19/06/2019];17(4):[aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en: http://ijmsc.org/doi/pdf/10.7224/1537-2073.2014-067

9. Helland CB, Holmøy T, Gulbrandsen P. Barriers and Facilitators Related to Rehabilitation Stays in Multiple Sclerosis. A Qualitative Study. Int J MS Care [Internet]. 2015 [citado 19/06/2019];17(3):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://ijmsc.org/doi/pdf/10.7224/1537-2073.2014-007

10. Fernández O, Fernández V, Baumstarck K, Muñoz L, Gonzalez M et al. Validación de la versión española de la escala de calidad de vida en esclerosis múltiple (musiqol). BMC Neurology. 2011;11:127.

11. Prosperini L, Piattella MC, Giannì C, Pantano P. Functional and Structural Brain Plasticity Enhanced by Motor and Cognitive Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis. Neural Plasticity [Internet]. 2015 [citado 19/06/2019];2015:[aprox. 12 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/np/2015/481574/

12. Yalachkov Y, Soydaş D, Bergmann J. Determinants of quality of life in relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;30(January):33–7.

13. Boucher F, Baumstarck K, Acquadro C. Challenges in Translating the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (Musiqol) Questionnaire in 57 Languages. Value Heal. 2015;18(7): A762.

14. Bustos K, Pérez M, Finkelberg, Clark M. Factores relacionados con la calidad de vida en pacientes en neurorrehabilitación transdisciplinaria: estudio de corte transversal. Neurol Argn [Internet]. 2016 [citado 19/06/2019];8(3):[aprox. 4 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-neurologia-argentina-301-articulo-factores-relacionados-con-calidad-vida-S1853002816000252

15. Retamal H, Fernández R, Fernández A, Montaña G. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud de las personas con esclerosis múltiple en la región de Magallanes, Chile. Rev Chil Salud Pública. 2019;23(2):97-104.