medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Hematología

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hematol Mex 2022; 23 (4)

A 35-nucleotide insertion mutation in BCR-ABL1 in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia in relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Vidal-Sánchez IE, Alvidrez A, Acosta B, Cervera E, Barranco-Lampón GI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 15
Page: 254-259
PDF size: 353.79 Kb.


Key words:

Chronic myeloid leukemia, Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Imatinib, Dasatinib.

ABSTRACT

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are crucial when treating patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, as they are considered first-line therapy, replacing other potential curative strategies, such as stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, several patients in the chronic phase fail to achieve optimal response to initial therapy with imatinib, and alternatives should be considered.
Clinical case: A 53-year-old female patient diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome- positive chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia, initially treated with imatinib. She underwent a failed allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT), for which imatinib therapy was reinitiated and, after several years, drug resistance was documented. The BCR-ABL135INS mutation was found, and treatment with dasatinib, a second-generation TKI (2GTKI), was started. After twelve months on dasatinib, neither cytogenetic nor major molecular responses have been achieved.
Conclusions: Mutations in the BCR-ABL1 gene causing alternative splicing variants are only one of the many proposed mechanisms of TKI resistance and should be taken into consideration when there is a failure to achieve response milestones to standard treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Minciacchi V, Kumar R, Krause D. Chronic myeloid leukemia:A model disease of the past, present and future. Cells 2021;10: 117. 10.3390/cells10010117.

  2. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H. Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2020update on diagnosis, therapy and monitoring. Am J Hematol2020; 95: 691-709. 10.1002/ajh.25792.

  3. Marcé S, Zamora L, Cabezón M, Xicoy B, et al. Frequencyof ABL gene mutations in chronic myeloid leukemiapatients resistant to imatinib and results of treatmentswitch to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Med Clin (Barc) 2013; 141: 95-99. 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.10.028.

  4. Quintás-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, Cortes J. Mechanismsof primary and secondary resistance to imatinib in chronicmyeloid leukemia. Cancer Control 2009; 16: 122-131.10.1177/107327480901600204.

  5. Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver R, Schiffer C, et al. EuropeanLeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treatingchronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2020; 34: 966-984.Doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2.

  6. Adnan-Awad S, Kankainen M, Mustjoki S. Mutationallandscape of chronic myeloid leukemia: more than a singleoncogene leukemia. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2021; 62:2064-2078. 10.1080/10428194.2021.1894652.

  7. Noens L, van Lierde M, De Bock R, Verhoef G, et al. Prevalence,determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence toimatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia:the ADAGIO study. Blood 2009; 113: 5401-5411. Doi:10.1182/blood-2008-12-196543.

  8. Osman A, Deininger M. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia:Modern therapies, current challenges and future directions.Blood Rev 2021; 49: 100825. Doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100825.

  9. Soverini S, Hochhaus A, Nicolini F, Gruber F, et al. BCRABLkinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloidleukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors:recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of EuropeanLeukemiaNet. Blood 2011; 118: 1208-1215. Doi:

  10. 10.1182/blood-2010-12-326405.10. Alves R, Gonçalves A, Rutella S, Almeida A, De Las Rivas J,Trougakos I, et al. Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors inchronic myeloid leukemia—from molecular mechanisms toclinical relevance. Cancers. 2021; 13: 4820. Doi: 10.3390/cancers13194820.

  11. Slupianek A, Falinski R, Znojek P, Stoklosa T, Flis S, DonedduV et al. BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibits uracil DNA glycosylaseUNG2 to enhance oxidative DNA damage and stimulategenomic instability. Leukemia 2012; 27: 629-634. Doi:10.1038/leu.2012.294.

  12. O'Hare T, Zabriskie M, Eide C, Agarwal A, Adrian L, You H etal. The BCR-ABL35INS insertion/truncation mutant is kinase-inactive and does not contribute to tyrosine kinase inhibitorresistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2011;118: 5250-5254. Doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-349191.

  13. Ishida T, Miyazaki K, Okina S, Miyata T, Hayama K, HigashiharaM, et al. The clinical outcomes of chronicmyeloid leukemia patients harboring alternatively splicedBCR-ABL variants. Hematology 2018; 24: 49-51. Doi:10.1080/10245332.2018.1507883.

  14. Yuda J, Odawara J, Minami M, Muta T, Kohno K, TanimotoK, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors induce alternative splicedBCR‐ABLIns35bp variant via inhibition of RNA polymeraseII on genomic BCR‐ABL. Cancer Science 2020; 111: 2361-2373. Doi: 10.1111/cas.14424.

  15. Marcé S, Cortés M, Zamora L, Cabezón M, Grau J, Millá F,et al. A thirty-five nucleotides BCR-ABL1 insertion mutationof controversial significance confers resistance to imatinibin a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Exp MolPathol 2015; 99: 16-18. Doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.04.007.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Hematol Mex. 2022;23