medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta de Otorrinolaringología & Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello

ISSN 2539-0859 (Electronic)
ISSN 0120-8411 (Print)
Asociación Colombiana de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y cuello, Maxilofacial y Estética Facial (ACORL)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta de Otorrinolaringología CCC 2023; 51 (2)

Clinical evaluation for chin augmentation in patients undergoing rhinoplasty

Henao SKS, Miranda CPA, Blanco PM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 123-128
PDF size: 201.64 Kb.


Key words:

Rhinoplasty, genioplasty, surgery, plastic.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Detailed analysis of nasofacial proportions plays a fundamental role in achieving facial harmony and identifying imbalances; thus, surgical treatment is directed to achieve better postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of patients undergoing rhinoplasty who also required chin augmentation. Materials and methods: 100 volunteer rhinoplasty patients between 17 and 55 years of age were selected and a preoperative photographic study was performed. Facial analysis of the lower third of the face was performed by three methods: Gonzalez-Ulloa, Goode and Silver, univariate and bivariate analysis was performed. Results: 100 voluntary patients entered the study, 7 of these were excluded, leaving 73 women and 20 men, the minimum age was 17 years and the maximum 55 years, with an average of 28.4 years. The mean age of the men was 30.9 years and of the women 28.2 years. Of the total number of patients, 96.7% of the patients com- plied with 2 or 3 methods for chin augmentation, of these 78.8% were women and 21.1% men. Conclusions: Adequate analysis of nasofacial proportions is essential to determine the procedures necessary to achieve a good surgical outcome and greater patient satisfaction. These methods do not replace the surgeon’s aesthetic judgment; however, they provide an objective standard for the diagnosis of facial imbalances.


REFERENCES

  1. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical andhorizontal proportions of the face in young adult NorthAmerican Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. PlastReconstr Surg. 1985;75(3):328-38. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198503000-00005

  2. Navarro C, Villanueva JA. Proporciones del equilibrio facial.El acondicionamiento seguro y sencillo de supraestructuras deimplante. Quintessenz Zahntech. 2010;36(7):886-900.

  3. Rohrich R, Adams W, Ahmad J, Gunter J. Proporcionesnasofaciales y análisis nasal sistemático. En: Rohrich R, AdamsW, Ahmad J, et al., eds. Rinoplastia de Dallas. Cirugía nasal porlos maestros. 1 vol. 3.a edición. China, Amolca; 2017. [Nota:falta indicar las páginas del capítulo 85-110]

  4. Arroyo HH, Olivetti IP, Lima LF, Jurado JR. Clinical evaluationfor chin augmentation: literature review and algorithm proposal.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(5):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.09.009

  5. Ahmed J, Patil S, Jayaraj S. Assessment of the chin in patientsundergoing rhinoplasty: what proportion may benefit from chinaugmentation? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(2):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.10.041

  6. Fernández Fernández KD, López Ulloa F. Ángulo de convexidadfacial y proyección del mentón en pacientes postoperadosde rinoseptoplastia. Acta otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello.2020;47(1):47-52. doi: 10.37076/acorl.v47i1.293

  7. Chinski L, Martín AJ, Piazza CD. Mentoplastía de avance.REVISTA FASO. 2013;20(2):23-8.

  8. Peleman JR, Chung MT, Johnson J, Rayess H, Priest CR, HojjatH, et al. Surgical Adjuncts to Rhinoplasty: An AlgorithmicApproach. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(5):1694-704. doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01744-9

  9. Olate MS, Henríquez AM, Huenchullán CI, Unibazo ZA,Alister HJP, Uribe FF. Cambio de imagen facial en base arinoseptoplastía y cirugía ortognática: Resultados preliminares.Rev. Otorrinolaringol. Cir. Cabeza Cuello. 2019;79(1):41-9.doi: 10.4067/S0718-48162019000100041

  10. Seah TE, Bellis H, Ilankovan V. Orthognathic patients withnasal deformities: case for simultaneous orthognathic surgeryand rhinoplasty. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(1):55-9.doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.12.009

  11. Frodel JL. Evaluation and treatment of deformities of thechin. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005;13(1):73-84. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2004.06.001

  12. Wolfe A, Boucree T. Manejo del mentón en pacientes conrinoplastia. En: Rohrich R, Adams W, Ahmad J, et al., eds.Rinoplastia de Dallas. Cirugía nasal por los maestros. 1 vol. 3.aedición. China, Amolca; 2017. 747-771.

  13. González-Ulloa M, Stevens E. The role of chin correction inprofileplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;41(5):477-86. doi:10.1097/00006534-196805000-00010

  14. Constantine F, et al. Aumento del mentón con implantes orellenos de tejido blando. En: Rohrich R, Adams W, Ahmad J,et al., eds. Rinoplastia de Dallas. Cirugía nasal por los maestros.1 vol. 3.a edición. China, Amolca; 2017. 723-745




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta de Otorrinolaringología CCC. 2023;51