medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2023; 83 (4)

Outcomes of (chinese) mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a prospective trial

Refaat HM, Zaza M, Salem T, Hassan M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 1-12
PDF size: 323.98 Kb.


Key words:

Renal calculi, chinese mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, complications.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) has been recently advocated as a minimally invasive procedure for the management of renal stone. In this trial, we assessed the postoperative outcomes of chinese mini-PCNL (MPCNL) in adult patients with renal calculi less than 3 cm in diameter.
Material and methods: We performed a single-arm prospective trial that recruited adult patients with unilateral single kidney stones less than 3 cm. Patients were followed up for the assessment of postoperative complications and stone-free status.
Results: Sixty patients were included in the present study, with a mean age of 36.9 ±8.5 years and slightly male predominance (56.7%). The mean operative time was 133.7 ±29.2 minutes. None of the patients needed a nephrostomy tube or DJ tube stent. The mean hospital stay was 1.4±0.62 days. Eight patients (13.3%) showed mild perinepheric collection on the postoperative US. All patients had mild postoperative pain, with no incidence of post-operative bleeding, residual stone, sepsis, or pelvi-calyceal injury. A total of four patients (6.7%) had a postoperative fever. The incidence of postoperative urine was 13.3%.
Conclusion: Chinese Mini-PCNL is an effective minimally invasive modality for the management of renal calculi less than 3 cm, with a low rate of postoperative complications and excellent stone-free status. Mini-PCNL can be used in well-resourced centres to reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay among patients with renal calculi.


REFERENCES

  1. Bai Y, Tang Y, Deng L, Wang X, Yang Y,Wang J, et al. Management of large renalstones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versuspercutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7

  2. Ferakis N, Stavropoulos M. Mini percutaneousnephrolithotomy in the treatment ofrenal and upper ureteral stones: Lessonslearned from a review of the literature.Urol Ann. 2015;7(2):141. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.152927

  3. Bai Y, Wang X, Yang Y, Han P, WangJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versusretrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatmentof kidney stones up to 2 cm in patients withsolitary kidney: a single centre experience.BMC Urology. 2017;17(1):9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0200-z

  4. Thapa BB, Niranjan V. Mini PCNL OverStandard PCNL: What Makes it Better? SurgJ. 2020;06(01):e19–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701225

  5. Long Q, Guo J, Xu Z, Yang Y, Wang H, ZhuY, et al. Experience of Mini-PercutaneousNephrolithotomy in the Treatment of LargeImpacted Proximal Ureteral Stones. UrologiaInternationalis. 2013;90(4):384–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000343668

  6. Chan DY, Jarrett TW. Techniques in EndourologyMini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Journal ofEndourology. 2000;14(3):269–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2000.14.269

  7. Ruhayel Y, Tepeler A, Dabestani S, MacLennanS, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. Tract Sizes inMiniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: ASystematic Review from the European Associationof Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel.European Urology. 2017;72(2):220–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.046

  8. Hamamoto S, Yasui T, Okada A, Taguchi K, KawaiN, Ando R, et al. Endoscopic Combined IntrarenalSurgery for Large Calculi: Simultaneous Use ofFlexible Ureteroscopy and Mini-PercutaneousNephrolithotomy Overcomes the Disadvantageousof Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Monotherapy.Journal of Endourology. 2014;28(1):28–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0361

  9. Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, DocimoSG. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infantsand preschool age children: experience witha new technique. Urology. 1998;52(4):697–701. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00315-x

  10. Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, Yang S, Xia Y, RuanY. Minimally Invasive Tract in PercutaneousNephrolithotomy for Renal Stones. Journalof Endourology. 2010;24(10):1579–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0581

  11. Salih EM, Elsotohi I, Elhelaly H, ElsalhyM, Mourad MM. Safety and efficacy ofChinese minimally invasive percutaneousnephrolithotomy in the management of renalstones ≤ 2 cm: a single-center experience.Afr J Urol. 2019;25(1):7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-019-0002-5

  12. World Medical Association. World MedicalAssociation Declaration of Helsinki: EthicalPrinciples for Medical Research InvolvingHuman Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

  13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ,Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. TheStrengthening the Reporting of ObservationalStudies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement:guidelines for reporting observational studies. JClin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

  14. Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K, Sari E, BerberogluY, Baykal M, et al. Classification ofPercutaneous Nephrolithotomy ComplicationsUsing the Modified Clavien Grading System:Looking for a Standard. European Urology.2008;53(1):184–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049

  15. American Urological Association. KidneyStones: Surgical Management Guideline.American Urological Association; 2016.

  16. Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, Lei M, Yuan J, Wan SP,et al. Minimally invasive versus standardpercutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):563–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y

  17. Jiao B, Luo Z, Huang T, Zhang G, Yu J.A systematic review and meta‑analysis ofminimally invasive vs. standard percutaneousnephrolithotomy in the surgical managementof renal stones. Exp Ther Med. 2021;21(3):213.doi: https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9645

  18. Li L-Y, Gao X, Yang M, Li J-F, Zhang H-B,Xu W-F, et al. Does a Smaller Tract inPercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Contribute toLess Invasiveness? A Prospective ComparativeStudy. Urology. 2010;75(1):56–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.006

  19. Zeng G, Mai Z, Zhao Z, Li X, Zhong W, YuanJ, et al. Treatment of upper urinary calculiwith Chinese minimally invasive percutaneousnephrolithotomy: a single-center experiencewith 12,482 consecutive patients over 20 years.Urolithiasis. 2013;41(3):225–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0561-z

  20. Sakr A, Salem E, Kamel M, Desoky E, Ragab A,Omran M, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneousnephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL formanagement of renal stones in the flankfreemodified supine position: single-centerexperience. Urolithiasis. 2017;45(6):585–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0966-1

  21. ElSheemy MS, Elmarakbi AA, Hytham M,Ibrahim H, Khadgi S, Al-Kandari AM. Minivs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy forrenal stones: a comparative study. Urolithiasis.2019;47(2):207–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1055-9

  22. Güler A, Erbin A, Ucpinar B, Savun M, SarilarO, Akbulut MF. Comparison of miniaturizedpercutaneous nephrolithotomy and standardpercutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatmentof large kidney stones: a randomized prospectivestudy. Urolithiasis. 2019;47(3):289–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1061-y

  23. Chen Q, Cao Y, Xia L, Zhong H, Du Z,Xuan H, et al. The retrospective experienceof day-surgery semi tubeless ultra-minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy. Transl AndrolUrol. 2021;10(2):654–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1060

  24. Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu W, Chen W,Wu K. Minimally invasive percutaneousnephrolithotomy with multiple mini tracts ina single session in treating staghorn calculi.Urol Res. 2011;39(2):117–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0308-z

  25. Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B,Sadeghirad B, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, et al.Prolonged operative duration is associated withcomplications: a systematic review and metaanalysis.J Surg Res. 2018;229:134–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.022

  26. Jiao B, Luo Z, Xu X, Zhang M, ZhangG. Minimally invasive percutaneousnephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenalsurgery in surgical management of upper urinarystones - A systematic review with meta-analysis.International Journal of Surgery. 2019;71:1–11.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.005

  27. Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G. Do Patients Benefit from MiniaturizedTubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? AComparative Prospective Study. Journal ofEndourology. 2010;24(7):1075–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0111




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2023;83