medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 09

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2023; 91 (09)

Results of workshop for obstetrics and gynecology residents on episiotomy and injury obstetric tear repair

Salcedo GA, Granados MV, Montiel MRI, Ramírez IC, Gorbea CV
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 653-659
PDF size: 212.57 Kb.


Key words:

Lacerations, Episiotomy, Perineal tears, Workshop, Sutures, Satisfaction, Questionnaires, Incidence.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the knowledge, satisfaction and level of confidence of Gynaecology and Obstetrics residents after participating in a simulation workshop on episiotomy and severe perineal tear repair.
Materials and Methods: Observational and cross-sectional study carried out in residents of the speciality of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in June 2022. Knowledge questionnaires were administered before and after the workshop, a satisfaction and confidence level survey, as well as a checklist to assess the post-workshop episiotomy and tear repair technique. Descriptive statistics and paired t-test were used for pre- and post-test comparison. A p ‹ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Resultados: Thirty-seven resident physicians of all academic grades were included. The mean pre-test assessment was 14.89 ± 0.54 points and 15.81 ± 0.41 points at posttest, p = 0.233. During episiotomy repair practice, 34 of the 37 residents recognized anatomical structures and all selected suture material appropriately. In the perineal tears workshop 25 of 37 recognized anatomical structures and all but one selected material appropriately.
Conclusions: The workshop with simulation animal models has a high satisfaction and confidence level; however, no improvement in knowledge was observed in this study. This positive effect on trainee doctors allows early identification of anal sphincter injuries, correct repair and consequently a decrease in the incidence of dysfunction associated with perineal obstetric trauma.


REFERENCES

  1. Hoopes S, Pham T, Lindo FM, Antosh DD. Home surgical skilltraining resources for obstetrics and gynecology traineesduring a pandemic. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136: 56-64. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003931

  2. Cornet A, Porta O, Piñeiro L, Ferriols E, Gich I, Calaf J. Managementof obstetric perineal tears: Do obstetrics andgynaecology residents receive adequate training? Resultsof an anonymous survey. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012; 2012:1-7. doi: 10.1155/2012/316983

  3. Roper JC, Amber N, Wan OYK, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Reviewof available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincterinjury. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 31: 2247-59. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04464-5

  4. Spinelli A, Laurenti V, Carrano FM, Gonzalez-Díaz E,Borycka-Kiciak K. Diagnosis and treatment of obstetric analsphincter injuries: New evidence and perspectives. J ClinMed 2021; 10: 3261. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153261

  5. Wahyuningtyas R, Kurniawati EM, Utomo B, Hardianto G,Paraton H, Hastono T, et al. Obstetrics and gynecology residents’satisfaction and self-confidence after anal sphincterinjury simulation-based workshop in Indonesia: a pre- andpost-intervention comparison study. J Educ Eval Health Prof2022; 19:4. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.4

  6. Siddighi S, Kleeman SD, Baggish MS, Rooney CM, PaulsRN, Karram MM. Effects of an educational workshop onperformance of fourth-degree perineal laceration repair.Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 289-94. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000251499.18394.9f

  7. Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Kettle C, Thakar R. Methods of repairfor obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane DatabaseSyst Rev 2013; (12): CD002866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002866.pub3. PMID: 24318732

  8. Taithongchai A, Veiga SI, Sultan AH, Thakar R. The consequencesof undiagnosed obstetric anal sphincter injuries(OASIS) following vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J 2020;31: 635-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04033-5

  9. Hickman LC, Propst K. Accurate diagnosis and repair of obstetricanal sphincter injuries: why and how. Am J Obstet Gynecol2020; 222 (6): 580.e1-580.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.044

  10. Martinez A, Cassling C, Keller J. Objective structured assessmentof technical skills to teach and study retentionof fourth-degree laceration repair skills. J Grad Med Educ2015; 7: 32-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00233.1

  11. Zimmo K, Laine K, Vikanes Å, Fosse E, Zimmo M, Ali H, et al.Diagnosis and repair of perineal injuries: knowledge beforeand after expert training -a multicentre observational studyamong Palestinian physicians and midwives. BMJ Open2017; 7: e014183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014183




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2023;91