medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz

2023, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2023; 46 (5)

Anthropological algology and bioethics

Martinez PF

Language: English
References: 17
Page: 247-250
PDF size: 161.58 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The importance of biopsychosocial factors in the genesis and maintenance of disease is increasingly being recognized. Most illnesses should be studied from a multifactorial perspective to facilitate understanding and treating them. Many psychopathological processes involve factors such as loneliness, hopelessness, and lack of social cohesion. As early as the nineteenth century, J.M. Charcot defined those illnesses in which no organic lesion was visible as functional disorders. Today, the anthropological view of illness known as the Heidelberg School provides us with a more global and comprehensible assessment of illness. The anthropological approach is complemented by a bioethical one, a bioethics of daily life which, as a practical science, studies and evaluates the living conditions of individuals, seeking practical solutions and contributing its reflections with deliberation and care. In this paper, we aim to highlight the most important factors that have an impact on illness by providing an anthropological view of illness and bringing bioethics closer to everyday life.


REFERENCES

  1. Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Los científicos se levantan contrala significación estadística. Naturaleza, 567, 305-307.

  2. Campolongo, D., Martin, A., Tammaro, M. S., & Torregiani, M. (2015). NiñosMedicalizados. VII Congreso Internacional de Investigación y PracticaProfesional en Psicología. XXII Jornadas de Investigación. XI Encuentro deInvestigadores en Psicología del MERCOSUR. Universidad de Buenos Aires.

  3. Cortina, A. (1986). Ética mínima: Introducción a la filosofía práctica. Madrid,España: Editorial Tecnos.

  4. Engel, G. (1977). The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine.Science, 196(4286), 129-136. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.847460

  5. García Baró, M. (2012). Sentir y pensar la vida. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.

  6. Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S.N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Pruebas estadísticas, valores de P, intervalos deconfianza y poder: una guía para malas interpretaciones. Revista Europea deEpidemiología, 31, 337-350. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3

  7. Haanes, J. V., Nordin, S., Hillert, L., Witthöft, M., van Kamp, I., van Thriel, C., &Van den Bergh, O. (2020). “Symptoms associated with environmental factors”(SAEF) - Towards a paradigm shift regarding “idiopathic environmentalintolerance” and related phenomena. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 131,109955. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109955

  8. Kaufmann, J. C. (2021). La entrevista comprensiva. Madrid, España: DADOEdiciones.

  9. Laín Entralgo, P. (1969). El médico y el enfermo. Madrid, España: EditorialTriacastela.

  10. Lipowsky, Z. (1984). What does the Word “psychosomatic” really mean?Psychosomatic Medicine, 46(2), 153-172. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198403000-00007

  11. Lolas, F. (2002). Bioética y Medina (pp. 22-24). Santiago, Chile: Editorial BibliotecaAmericana.

  12. Lolas, F. (2022). Dialogicidad, Dolor, Cultura, Bioética. Retrieved from www. semp.org.es

  13. Organización Internacional del Trabajo [OIT], Consejo Internacional de Enfermeras[CIE], Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS], Internacional de ServiciosPúblicos [ISP]. (2002). Directrices marco para afrontar la violencia laboralen el sector de la salud. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---sector/documents/publication/wcms_160911.pdf

  14. Sackett, D., Haynes, R., & Tugwell, P. (1994). Epidemiología clínica. Una cienciabásica para la Medicina Clínica. Madrid, España: Editorial Diaz de Santos.

  15. Sánchez González, M. A. (2021). Bioética en ciencias de la salud. Barcelona,España: Editorial Elsevier.

  16. Simpson, G. (1944). Tempo and mode in evolution. New York, USA: ColumbiaUniversity Press.

  17. Sturm, N., Stolz, R., Schalhorn, F., Valentini, J., Krisam, J., Frick, E., ... Straßner,C. (2021). Self-Efficacy, Social Activity, and Spirituality in the Care of ElderlyPatients with Polypharmacy in Germany—A Multicentric Cross-SectionalStudy within the HoPES3 Trial. Healthcare, 9(10), 1312. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101312




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com