medigraphic.com
ISSN 2539-0859 (Electronic)
ISSN 0120-8411 (Print)
Asociación Colombiana de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y cuello, Maxilofacial y Estética Facial (ACORL)

2023, Number 3

<< Back

Acta de Otorrinolaringología CCC 2023; 51 (3)

Reduction genioplasty in facial harmonization: case report

Malaver-Caicedo LF, Mejía-Barbosa JP, Borda-Pedraza KA, Maranhão-Tavares CLF, Díaz-Valenzuela M

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 232-238
PDF size: 264.53 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Sliding Genioplasty is an important tool in the aesthetic surgery of the lower third of the face, it allows the harmonization by moving the osteotomized segment in different planes. Objective: to describe the pre-surgical analysis for a Genioplasty in a patient with skeletal anomaly and macrogenia in the vertical and horizontal dimensions. Results: the analysis concludes a chin reduction in two planes, an infrequent procedure in the surgical management of the lower third. Discussion: although most of the corrections made today involve an advance or descent of the chin in cases of retro or microgenia, it is important to recognize other deformities and evaluate facial proportions, dental occlusion, cephalometric measurements and photographic images identifying the specific needs of each patient. Conclusion: performing a correct identification of the skeletal class and an aesthetic facial analysis allows identifying the type of deformity and planning its surgical management.


REFERENCES

  1. Bertossi D, Galzignato PF, Albanese M, Botti C, Botti G, NociniPF. Chin Microgenia: A Clinical Comparative Study. AestheticPlast Surg. 2015;39(5):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0518-4

  2. Kumar BL, Raju GK, Kumar ND, Reddy GV, Naik BR, AcharyCR. Long term stability following genioplasty: a cephalometricstudy. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(4):44-50.

  3. Niechajev I. Reduction genioplasty for mandibular prognathismand long chin. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24(3):333-41. doi:10.1007/s10006-020-00853-8

  4. Bueller H. Ideal Facial Relationships and Goals. Facial PlastSurg. 2018;34(5):458-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669401

  5. Naini FB, Donaldson AN, McDonald F, Cobourne MT.Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceivedattractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician andlayperson. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(7):839-46. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2012.01.012

  6. Ho CT, Huang CS, Lo LJ. Improvement of chin profileafter mandibular setback and reduction genioplasty forcorrection of prognathism and long chin. Aesthetic Plast Surg.2012;36(5):1198-206. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-9933-y

  7. Ward JL, Garri JI, Wolfe SA. The osseous genioplasty. Clin PlastSurg. 2007;34(3):485-500. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.009

  8. Guyuron B, Michelow BJ, Willis L. Practical classification ofchin deformities. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995;19(3):257-64. doi:10.1007/BF00451101

  9. Arroyo HH, Olivetti IP, Lima LF, Jurado JR. Clinical evaluationfor chin augmentation: literature review and algorithm proposal.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(5):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.09.009

  10. Zide BM, Warren SM, Spector JA. Chin surgery IV: thelarge chin--key parameters for successful chin reduction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(2):530-37. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000267636.25672.81

  11. Sykes JM, Suárez GA. Chin Advancement, Augmentation,and Reduction as Adjuncts to Rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg.2016;43(1):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2015.09.021

  12. Lee EI. Aesthetic alteration of the chin. Semin Plast Surg.2013;27(3):155-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357113

  13. Hohl TH, Epker BN. Macrogenia: a study of treatmentresults, with surgical recommendations. Oral Surg OralMed Oral Pathol. 1976;41(5):545-67. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(76)90307-8




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com