medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica

2024, Number 49

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2024; 13 (49)

Nursing students’ satisfaction with educational video capsules

Bravo Cofré C, Cuadros-Carlesi K, Ruiz-Araya P, Oyarce QMR

Language: Spanish
References: 38
Page: 76-87
PDF size: 423.04 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Education videos contribute to the acquisition of knowledge and clinical skills of nursing students, serving as a complement to traditional laboratories.
Objective: To determine the level of student satisfaction regarding the utilization of educational video capsules.
Method: A quantitative, observational, cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with a convenience sample of 144 nursing students. Eight educational video capsules were developed for two subjects, which were viewed by the students. Using the “Video Capsule Evaluation Survey” instrument, students recorded their satisfaction The psychometric properties of the instrument were also studied.
Results: A total of 364 responses from students who viewed the video capsules were analyzed according to subject and topic. The overall perception of students regarding the video capsules was very positive, with a satisfaction rate of 91.2%. The video with the highest satisfaction was “Bed Making” (94.4% satisfaction), whereas the one with the lowest satisfaction was the video “Nasogastric Tube Placement” (89,1% satisfaction). The item with the highest satisfaction was the alignment between the video’s content and its objectives (98.3%), and the item with the highest dissatisfaction was the presence of the teacher’s image (8.3%). The overall reliability of the instrument was fi-Cronbach = 0.896. Exploratory factor analysis using the principal axis factoring method with Varimax rotation revealed a new proposed questionnaire with three dimensions and 19 items.
Discussion: Video capsules promote the active role of students in their educational process but require use alongside other types of resources.
Conclusions: The video capsules were positively evaluated, but there are aspects that need improvement regarding their format, for which a deeper understanding of students’ preferences is required. The proposed 19-item instrument is valid and reliable for systematic use.


REFERENCES

  1. Corchuelo-Fernández C, Cejudo-Cortes A, Vázquez-CanoE, López-Meneses E. Creación y análisis de un repositoriovideográfico educativo para la sensibilización deproblemas sociales en la educación superior. Form. univ. 2020;13(5):103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062020000500103

  2. Tapia-Jara J, Sánchez-Ortíz A, Vidal-Silva C. Estilos de aprendizajee intención de uso de videos académicos de YouTube enel contexto universitario chileno. Form. univ. 2020;13(1):3-12.http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062020000100003

  3. Fyfield M, Henderson M, Heinrich E, Redmond P. Videosin Higher Education: Making the Most of a Good Thing.Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2019;35(5):1-7. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5930

  4. Hibbert EJ, Lambert T, Carter JN, Learoyd DL, Twigg S,Clarke S. A randomized controlled pilot trial comparing theimpact of access to clinical endocrinology video demonstrationswith access to usual revision resources on medicalstudent performance of clinical endocrinology skills. BMCMed. Educ. 2013;13(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-135

  5. Ros Gálvez A, Rosa García A. Vídeos docentes de Microeconomía:análisis de su impacto externo e interno. Hist.comun. soc. 2014;18:75-84. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.43949

  6. Jang HW, Kim KJ. Uso de vídeos clínicos en línea para laformación de habilidades clínicas de estudiantes de medicina:beneficios y desafíos. BMC Med. Educ. 2014;14:56.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-56

  7. Holland A, Smith F, McCrossan G, Adamson E, Watt S, PennyK. Online video in clinical skills education of oral medicationadministration for undergraduate student nurses: a mixedmethod, prospective cohort study. Nurse Educ. Today.2013;33(6):663-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.006

  8. Eom MR, Kim SK, Park MH. Effectiveness of Video Recordingand Self-Evaluation for Skill Training in UndergraduateNursing Education. Med- Legal Update. 2020;20(1):2143-8. https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v20i1.698

  9. Forbes H, Oprescu FI, Downer T, Phillips NM, McTier L,Lord B, et al. Use of videos to support teaching and learningof clinical skills in nursing education: A review. NurseEduc. Today. 2016;42:53-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.010

  10. Montiel I, Delgado-Ceballos J, Ortiz-de-Mandojana N, etal. New Ways of Teaching: Using Technology and MobileApps to Educate on Societal Grand Challenges. J Bus Ethics.2020;161:243-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04184-x

  11. Sowan AK, Idhail J. Evaluation of an interactive web-basednursing course with streaming videos for medication administrationskills. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2014;83:592-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.004

  12. Mireles Vázquez MG, García García JA. Satisfacción estudiantilen universitarios: una revisión sistemática de laliteratura. Rev. Educación. 2022;46(2):610-26. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v46i2.47621

  13. Rouf A, Rahman M, Uddin M. Students’ Satisfaction andService Quality of HEIs. IJARBSS. 2016;6(5):376-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i5/2155

  14. Tapia-Jara J, Sanchez-Ortiz A, Vidal-Silva C. Estilos de aprendizajee intención de uso de videos académicos de YouTube enel contexto universitario chileno. Form. Univ. 2020;13(1):3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062020000100003

  15. Fisher R, Perényi Á, Birdthistle N. The positive relationshipbetween flipped and blended learning and student engagement,performance and satisfaction. Act. Learn. High. Educ.2018;22:97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702

  16. Sirgy M, Grzeskowiak S, Rahtz D. Quality of college life(QCL) of students: developing and validating a measure ofwell-being. Soc Indic Res. 2007;80(2):343-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-5921-9

  17. Sowan AK, Jenkins LS. Designing, delivering and evaluatinga distance learning nursing course responsive to studentsneeds. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2013;82(6):553-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.004

  18. Gavilán D, Manzano R, Martínez MG, Fernández S, AbrilM, Alonso L, et al. Video-cápsulas para mejorar tus competenciascomo universitario. [Internet]. Universidad Complutensede Madrid; 2018 [citado 2023 Agosto 4]. Disponibleen: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/14545

  19. Fernandez-Pampillón C, Domínguez E, Cazorla M, De ArmasI, López-Varela A. Herramienta para la revisión de laCalidad de Objetos de Aprendizaje Universitarios (COdA).Guía del Usuario. [Internet]. Universidad Complutensede Madrid; 2011 [citado 2023 Agosto 4]. Disponible en:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/48984

  20. Revelle W, Condon DM. Reliability. En: The Wiley Handbookof Psychometric Testing: A Multidisciplinary Referenceon Survey, Scale and Test Development. Hoboken:Wiley; 2018. p. 709-49.

  21. Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrixappropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. PsycholBull. 1974;81(6):358-61. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036316

  22. Romero-Ocas S. Satisfacción estudiantil en las maestrías deeducación de la universidad nacional mayor de San Marcos.Rev. Inv. Val. 2021;15(1):7-16. https://doi.org/10.33554/riv.15.1.804

  23. Cadena-Badilla M, Mejías-Acosta A, Vega-Robles A, Vásquez-Quiroga J. La satisfacción estudiantil universitaria:análisis estratégico a partir del análisis de factores. Idata.2015;18(1):9-18. https://doi.org/10.15381/idata.v18i1.12062

  24. Real-Delor RE, Codas ME. Encuesta de satisfacción conla enseñanza de egresados del postgrado en medicina interna.Rev. Nac. (Itauguá). 2020;12(2):47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.18004/rdn2020.dic.02.047.060

  25. Sánchez-Otero M, García-Guiliany J, Steffens-Sanabria E,Palma H. Estrategias Pedagógicas en Procesos de Enseñanzay Aprendizaje en la Educación Superior incluyendoTecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. Inf.Tecnol. 2019;30(3):277-286. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642019000300277

  26. Araújo-Girão A, Silva-Nunes M, Costa-Lima I, Freitas-Aires S, Paz de Oliveira S, Fontenele-Lima R. Tecnologías enla enseñanza en enfermería, innovación y uso de TIC: revisiónintegrativa. Enferm. Univ. 2020;17(4):475-489. https://doi.org/10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2020.4.763

  27. Lin ZC. Comparison of technology-based cooperative learningwith technology-based individual learning in enhancingfundamental nursing proficiency. Nurse Educ. Today.2013;33(5):546-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.006

  28. Lee NJ, Chae SM, Kim H, Lee JH, Min HJ, Park DE. Mobile-basedvideo learning outcomes in clinical nursing skill education: arandomized controlled trial. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2016;34(1):8-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000183

  29. Bloomfield JG, While AE, Roberts JD. Using computerassisted learning for clinical skills education in nursing:integrative review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008;63(3):222-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04653.x

  30. Natarajan J, Joseph MA, Al Shibli ZS, Al Hajji SS, Al HanawiDK, Al Kharusi AN, Al Maqbali IM. Effectiveness ofan Interactive Educational Video on Knowledge, Skill andSatisfaction of Nursing Students. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J.2022;22(4):546-553. http://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2.2022.013.

  31. Pérez-Pérez C, Pareces-Arce D, Jara-Rosales S, Sepúlveda-Gotterbarm J. Videoteca como recurso didáctico audiovisualde apoyo en la asignatura Proceso de Atención de EnfermeríaPerinatal y Ginecológico. Metas Enferm. 2022;25(6):50-6. https://doi.org/10.35667/MetasEnf.2022.25.1003081956

  32. Pattier D, Ferreira PD. El vídeo educativo en educaciónsuperior durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 [Educationalvideo in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic].Pixel-Bit. Rev. Medios. Educ. 2022;65:183-208. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.93511

  33. Vera Balderas S, Moreno Tapia J. Experiencias de aprendizajeen YouTube, un análisis durante la pandemia de COVID-19.IE REDIECH. 2021;12:e1139. https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v12i0.1139

  34. Roque Rodríguez E. Tutoriales de Youtube como estrategiade aprendizaje no formal en estudiantes universitarios.RIDE. Rev. Iberoam. Investig. Desarro. Educ. 2020;11(21).https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i21.797

  35. Martínez-Castillo F, Matus-Miranda R. Desarrollo de habilidadescon simulación clínica de alta fidelidad. Perspectivade los estudiantes de enfermería. Enferm. Univ. 2015;12(2):93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2015.04.003

  36. Frota NM, Barros LM, Araújo TM de, Caldini LN, NascimentoJC do, Caetano JÁ. Construção de uma tecnologiaeducacional para o ensino de enfermagem sobre punçãovenosa periférica. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2013;34(2):29-36.https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-14472013000200004

  37. Byrne AJ, Pugsley L, Hashem MA. Review of comparativestudies of clinical skills training. Med Teach. 2008;30(8):764-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802279587

  38. Gagnon MP, Gagnon J, Desmartis M, Njoya M. The impactof blended teaching on knowledge, satisfaction, and selfdirectedlearning in nursing undergraduates: a randomized,controlled trial. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2013;34(6):377-382.https://doi.org/10.5480/10-459




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com