medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Cardiaca en México

ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Card Mex 2019; 4 (1)

Reanimación cardiopulmonar y oxigenación por membrana extracorporea durante realización de procedimiento intervencionista en paciente postoperado de implante protésico aórtico

Hernández-Rendón E, Ortiz-Betance G, Galván-Cerón I, Lima R, Roldán-Morales D, Jiménez R, Díaz-Domínguez E, Elena-Medina L, Barragán A, Ramírez-Castañeda A, Ramírez-Castañeda S, Riera-Kinkel C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 19-22
PDF size: 322.45 Kb.


Key words:

ECMO, CPR, Cardiac arrest, Coronary intervention.

ABSTRACT

Survival after cardiorespiratory arrest has remained very low despite the innovative techniques and impact on quality and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Oxygenation by Veno-Arterial modality VA ECMO (Veno-Arterial modality) is a cardiopulmonary resuscitation for pediatric patients with cardiovascular cause of cardiac arrest should be considered as a rescue strategy in experience centers. We present here the case of a 13-year-old patient with complications after aortic valve replacement. Urgent coronariography showed thrombotic obstruction TIMI 1 in the left main coronary artery. Cardiorespiratory arrest was present. In a multitask fashion by ECMO team, it was decided to place circulatory support type VA ECMO. After achieving a TIMI 3 flow restoration in the culprit vessel, VA ECMO was removed on the 6th day without complications. The rest of evolution was uneventful. VA ECMO may be superior than the placement of percutaneous ventricular assistant devices in a patient with cardiorespiratory arrest in the haemodynamic room, where mechanical compression of the thorax can severely alter the working conditions of the interventional cardiologists.


REFERENCES

  1. Lee SH, Jung JS, Lee KH, Kim HJ, Son HS, Sun K. Comparison of ExtracorporealCardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation:Is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Beneficial? Korean JThorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;48:318-27.

  2. Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, et al. European Resuscitation CouncilGuidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation2015; 95:–80.

  3. Nichol G, Karmy-Jones R, Salerno C, et al. Systematic review of percutaneouscardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock states. Resuscitation2006; 70:381-94.

  4. Cheng R, Hachamovitch R, Kittleson M, et al: Complications of extracorporealmembrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: ameta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 97:610-6.

  5. Kagawa E, Dote K, Kato M, et al: Should we emergently revascularize occludedcoronaries for cardiac arrest? Rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenationand intra-arrest percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2012;126:1605-13.

  6. Stub D, Hengel C, Chan W, et al. Usefulness of cooling and coronary catheterizationto improve survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:522–7.

  7. Chen Y-S, Lin J-W, Yu H-Y, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assistedextracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation inadults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis.Lancet 2008; 372:554–61.

  8. Saia F, Grigioni F, Marzocchi A, Branzi A. Management of acute left ventriculardysfunction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevationacute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2010;160: S16–21.

  9. Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Linke A, et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation:therapy of choice for patients with aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta? Ann ThoracSurg 2010;90:1457–61.

  10. Wallmüller C, Sterz F, Testori C, et al. Emergency cardio-pulmonary bypass incardiac arrest: Seventeen years of experience. Resuscitation 2013; 84: 326-30.

  11. Poppe M, Weisner C, Holzer M, et al. The incidence of “load&go” out-of-hospitalcardiac arrest candidates for emergency department utilization of emergency extracorporeallife support: A one-year review. Resuscitation 2015; 91: 131-6.

  12. Larsen AI, Hiornevik A, Bonarjee V, Barvik S, Melberg T, Nilsen DW. Coronaryblood flow and perfusion pressure during coronary angiography in patients withongoing mechanical chest compression: a case report on 6 cases. Resuscitation2010;81:493–7.

  13. Moreno R, Calvo L, Salinas P, et al. Causes perioperative mortality after transcatheteraortic valve im- plantation pooled analysis. J Invasive Cardiol 2011;23:180–4.

  14. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Report: International Summary.Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), 2018. https://www.elso.org/Registry/Statistics/InternationalSummary.aspx accesado el 22 Nov 2018.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Card Mex. 2019;4