medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Cardiaca en México

ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Card Mex 2016; 1 (4)

Revascularización miocárdica y endarterectomía carotídea: resultados del abordaje simultaneo

Orozco-Hernández EJ, Herrera-Llamas RM, Ramirez-Valdivia LA, Prior-Gonzalez OA, Torres-Herrera JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 124-128
PDF size: 243.01 Kb.


Key words:

Carotid endarterectomy, Myocardial revascularization, simultaneous approach.

ABSTRACT

Objective. Evaluate our experience with simultaneous myocardial revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the approach for patients with severe carotid and coronary artery disease, in terms of perioperative mortality and morbility.
Methods. Retrospective study of patients underwent to simultaneous myocardial revascularization and carotid endarterectomy , from November 2012 to November 2015.
Results. 13 patients. Average patient age was 70 years, 10 (76%) were male. 100% with functional class deterioration and/or angina. 12 (92%) of the patients with severe carotid didn´t have cerebrovascular symptoms. The left main coronary artery disease was critical in 10, and three vessels disease in 12. Carotid stenosis was unilateral in 11 and bilateral in 2. 3 patients suffer from valvular heart disease . General anesthesia , cardiopulmonary bypass and carotid shunting was used in all the cases. Patch angioplasty in 12 patients. In the patients without valvular surgery, mortality was 7.6% , from postcardiotomy ventricular failure, there were zero strokes and zero myocardial infarction. In patients with valvular surgery, 1 patient died from a ipsilateral stroke, in this group were 2 strokes and 1 myocardial infarction postoperative.
Conclusions. Simultaneous approach is a viable strategy for patients with severe coronary and carotid disease. The ideal procedure is controversial, and we require randomized studies to define the real rol of the available techniques.


REFERENCES

  1. Schwartz LB, Bridgman AH, Kieffer RW, et al. Asymptomatic carotid arterystenosis and stroke in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Vasc Surg1995; 21:146-53.

  2. Steinvel A, Sadeh B, Arbel Y , et al. Prevalence and predictors of concomitant carotidadn coronay artery atherosclerotic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:779-83.

  3. Bull DA, Neumayer LA, Hunter GC, et al. Risk factors for CVA in patients undergoingcoronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 1:182-185.

  4. Hirotani T, Kameda T, Kumamoto T, et al. Stroke after coronary artery bypassgrafting in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70:1571-1576.

  5. Naylor AR, Cuffe RL, Rothwell PM, et al. A systematic review of outcomes followingstaged and synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary bypass. EurJ Endovasc Surg 2003; 25:380-389.

  6. Sharma V, Deo S, Park S, et al. Meta-Analysis of staged versus combined carotidndarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:102-10.

  7. Ascher E, Hingorani A, Yorkovich W , et al. Rutine Preoperative carotid dúplexscaninng in patients undergoing open heart surgery: is it worthwile?. Ann VascSurg 2001; 15:669-78.

  8. D´Agostino RS, Svensson LG, Neumann DJ, et al. Screening carotid ultrasonographyand risk factors for stroke in coronary artery surgery patients. Ann ThoracSurg 1996; 62: 1714-1723.

  9. Burrell F. Synchronous carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosisand coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with concomitant disease- A literaturereview. Int J Surg 2012; 10: s1-s52.

  10. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronaryartery bypass graft surgery : Executive summary. A report of the AmericanCollege of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force onpractice guidelines .Circulation 2011; 124: 2610-2642.

  11. Kolh P, Windecker S, Alonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardialrevascularization. The task force on myocardial revascularization of the eruopeansociety of cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracicsurgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 44: 517-592

  12. Borger MA, Fremes SE, Weisel RD, et al. Coronary bypass and carotid endarterectomy : does a combined approach increase risk? A metaanalysis . Ann ThoracSurg 1999; 68: 14-20.

  13. Khan SM, Nazzal M, Zelenock G, et al. Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy andcoronary artery bypass grafting is associated with similar clinical outcomes withlower length of stay and hospital charges. J Vasc Surg 2015; 831.

  14. Timaran CH, Rosero MD, Smith ST, et al. Trends and outcomes of concurrentcarotid revascularization and coronary bypass. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48:355-361.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Card Mex. 2016;1