medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 05

<< Back

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2024; 92 (05)

Reference values of fetal Doppler at the Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes

Narváez CJ, Acevedo GS, Gallardo GJM, Velázquez TB
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 198-214
PDF size: 415.32 Kb.


Key words:

Pregnancy, Uterine artery, Umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, Venous duct, Pulsatility index, Doppler, Reference values.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Establish the reference values for the pulsatility index using pulsed Doppler in the maternal and fetal assessment of pregnancies followed at 18 and 39 weeks of gestation.
Materials and Methods: Descriptive and cross-sectional study, carried out in patients with a singleton pregnancy, between 18 and 40 weeks, who attended the Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine of the National Institute of Perinatology, from September 2017 to May 2018. The Doppler evaluation was performed, with measurement of the pulsatility index of the uterine, umbilical, middle cerebral arteries, and venous duct in each week of pregnancy. Reference tables were created for each gestational age, establishing percentiles 3, 5, 10, 90 and 95.
Results: A total of 862 patients were registered. The umbilical artery pulsatility index values were reported to be 17% at early gestational ages and 21% at older gestational ages; Umbilical artery values were 3% lower at early gestational ages and 10% lower at term of pregnancy; 20% for the umbilical artery, 15% for the ductus venosus and 10% for the middle cerebral artery. The values of the mean pulsatility index of the uterine arteries were 3% higher at early gestational ages and 28% lower at the end of pregnancy.
Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest significant differences with the populations of Europe and North America; They even differ from the reference values currently used in the Mexican population, which represents an underestimation of fetal and/or maternal conditions when carrying out evaluations of the feto-placental unit.


REFERENCES

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 134: Fetal growth restriction.Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (5): 1122-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9

  2. Figueras F, Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: newconcepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management.Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204 (4): 288- 300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.055

  3. Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, et al. The risk of intrauterinefetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus.Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207 (4): 318.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.039

  4. Caughey AB. How best to diagnose and treat the small-forgestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (5):397-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.021

  5. Unterscheider J, O'Donoghue K, Daly S, et al. Fetal growthrestriction and the risk of perinatal mortality-case studiesfrom the multicenter PORTO study. BMC PregnancyChildbirth 2014; 14 (1): 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-63

  6. Baschat AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM, et al. Predictors ofneonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction.Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (2 Pt 1): 253-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75

  7. Resnik R. Intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol2002; 99 (3): 490-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01780-x

  8. Rasmussen S, Irgens LM. History of fetal growth restrictionis more strongly associated with severe rather than milderpregnancy-induced hypertension. Hypertension 2008;51 (4): 1231-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.096248

  9. Apaza Valencia John. Validez diagnóstica del índice depulsatilidad y velocidad media de la arteria uterina enpreeclampsia y restricción del crecimiento intrauterino.Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet 2019; 65 (2): 163-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v65i2166.

  10. Arduini D, Rizzo G. Normal values of Pulsatility Index fromfetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthyfetuses. J Perinat Med 1990; 18 (3): 165-72.

  11. Mendoza-Carrera CE, Acevedo-Gallegos S, Lumbreras-Márquez M, et al. Comparación de cuatro tablas decrecimiento fetal para la predicción de desenlaces perinatalesadversos en un hospital de tercer nivel de México.Ginecol Obstet Mex 2021; 89 (9): 704-714. https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v89i9.5817

  12. Figueras F. Guía clínica: Doppler en medicina fetal. Serviciode Medicina Fetal. Instituto Clínico de Ginecología,Obstetricia y Neonatología, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona.2014. https://www.oyg.com.co/files/Doppler_en_Medicina_Fetal.pdf

  13. Encuesta Nacional de la Dinámica Demográfica. INEGI.Tabulados. 2015. www.inegi.org.mx.

  14. Shields BM, Knight BA, Hill AV, et al. Five-Year Follow-Upfor Women With Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Pregnancy.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98 (12): E1941-5. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-2768.

  15. Noriega Iriondo MF, Arias Sánchez EA, García López SMC.Hipertensión arterial en el embarazo. Médica Sur, México2005; 12 (4): 196-202.

  16. Diagnóstico y Manejo de la Cardiopatía en el embarazo.México: Secretaría de Salud, 2011. https://www.cenetecdifusion.com/CMGPC/IMSS-538-11/ER.pdf

  17. Bistre-Tajfed M, Vázquez-Alfaro R. Epilepsia en el embarazo.Arch Neurocien (Mex) 2013; 18 (2): 82-91.

  18. Beltrán Cámara AC, Torres Poot CA, Pereira Sánchez GA,et al. Diabetes pregestacional y sus complicaciones en elfeto. Revista Salud Quintana Roo. 2013.

  19. Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la FuenteMuñiz; Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, ComisiónNacional Contra las Adicciones, Secretaría de Salud. EncuestaNacional de Consumo de Drogas, Alcohol y Tabaco

  20. 2016-2017. Ciudad de México: INPRFM; 2017. https://www.gob.mx/salud%7Cconadic/acciones-y-programas/encuesta-nacional-de-consumo-de-drogas-alcohol-ytabaco-encodat-2016-2017-13675820. WHO. Global hepatitis report, 2017http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/global-hepatitisreport/es/

  21. ONUSIDA México http://www.unaids.org/es/regionscountries/countries/mexico

  22. INEGI. Comunicado de prensa núm. 244/19. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2019/EstSociodemo/ENADID2018.pdf

  23. Detección y Diagnóstico de Enfermedades Hipertensivasdel Embarazo. Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológicaen Salud. CENETEC; 2014. https://www.cenetec-difusion.com/CMGPC/IMSS-058-08/ER.pdf

  24. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la diabetes en el embarazo.México: Secretaría de Salud; 03/11/2016. https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/guiasclinicas/320GER.pdf

  25. Prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento del parto pretérmino.Guía de Evidencias y Recomendaciones: Guía dePráctica Clínica. México, CENETEC; 2017 https://www.cenetec-difusion.com/CMGPC/IMSS-063-08/ER.pdf

  26. De Castro F, Allen-Leigh B, Katz G, et al. Indicadores debienestar y desarrollo infantil en México. Salud públicaMéx 2013; 55 (Supl 2). https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/spm/v55s2/v55s2a25.pdf

  27. Banco Mundial. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/SH.DYN.NMRT

  28. Ahearne CE, Boylan GB, Murray DM. Short and long termprognosis in perinatal asphyxia: An update. World J Clin Pediatr2016; 5 (1): 67-74. https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v5.i1.67

  29. Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de la Asfixia Neonatal, catálogomaestro de guías de práctica clínica: IMSS-632-13. https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/guiasclinicas/632GER.pdf

  30. Bustos JC, Paublo M, Ramírez P, et al. Umbilical arteryhalf peak systolic velocity deceleration time throughoutpregnancy and its role in fetuses with bradycardia. UltrasoundObstet Gynecol 2007; 30 (7): 952-7. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.5185

  31. Gómez Wilches, MO. Curvas de normalidad con Dopplercontinuo en arteria umbilical durante el embarazo.Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 1994; 45 (4): 290-7.file:///G:/DESCARGAS/818-Texto%20del%20art%C3%ADculo-1792-1-10-20161102.pdf

  32. Medina N, Figueroa H, Guzmán M. Valores de referenciadel índice de pulsatilidad de las arterias uterinay umbilical durante el embarazo. Ginecol Obstet Mex2006: 74: 509-15. https://ginecologiayobstetricia.org.mx/download/2508 lang=es.inegi.org.mx/programas/enadid/2014/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2024;92