medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Pública de México

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2024; 66 (4)

Breastfeeding

González-Castell LD, Unar-Munguía M, Bonvecchio-Arenas A, Rivera-Pasquel M, Lozada-Tequeanes AL, Ramírez-Silva CI, Álvarez-Peña IJ, Cobo-Armijo F, Rivera-Dommarco JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 500-510
PDF size: 327.84 Kb.


Key words:

breastfeeding, gaps, 2030 global nutrition goals, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Objective. Estimate breastfeeding gaps in Mexico to achieve the 2030 global nutrition goals and provide public policy recommendations. Materials and methods. Data from women 12-59 years old and their children ‹24 months was analyzed using the National Health and Nutrition Survey (Ensanut, in Spanish) 2021 to 2023 to calculate breastfeeding indicators. The gaps to achieve the 2030 breastfeeding goals were estimated through comparison with national trends, considering the effectiveness of interventions in contexts similar to Mexico. Results. The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in children ‹6 months is 34.2% and 43% for continued breastfeeding at two years. Breastfeeding prevalence is lower among women with lower parity and with paid employment, and higher among women with a low Well-being Conditions Index at the household level and those who received previous information about breastfeeding during pregnancy or in consultation. With the current trend, it is estimated 42.5% of EBF by 2030. The 2030 global nutrition goal of 70% EBF will only be achieved if health and community personnel are trained to provide breastfeeding counseling, if the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative is strength ened, if there is compliance with the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes, and if paid maternity leave is extended in Mexico. Conclusions. It is necessary to implement policies and actions from different sectors that facilitate breastfeeding to achieve 2030 global nutrition goals.


REFERENCES

  1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al.Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelongeffect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7

  2. IBFAN, GIFA. Green Feeding-climate action from birth. Ginebra: IBFAN,GIFA, 2019 [citado abril 7, 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.gifa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2019-Green-Feeding-Europe-and-Worldwide-Dec4.pdf

  3. World Health Organization, Unicef. Global Breastfeeding Scorecard2023: Rates of Breastfeeding increase around the world through improvedprotection and support. WHO, Unicef, 2023 [citado abril 4, 2024]. Disponibleen: https://www.unicef.org/media/150586/file/Global breastfeedingscorecard 2023.pdf

  4. González-Castell LD, Unar-Munguía M, Bonvecchio-Arenas A, Ramírez-Silva I, Lozada-Tequeanes AL. Prácticas de alimentación infantil antes ydespués de la pandemia por Covid-19, Ensanut 2012 a 2022. Salud PublicaMex. 2023;13(65):559-69. https://doi.org/10.21149/15085

  5. Unicef, World Health Organization. The extension of the 2025maternal, infant, and young child nutrition targets to 2030: WHO/UNICEF discussion paper. Unicef, 2021 [citado junio 17, 2024].Disponible en: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/nutritionlibrary/global-targets-2025/discussion-paper-extension-targets-2030.pdf?sfvrsn=4c75b190_5

  6. Secretaría de Salud. Estrategia nacional de lactancia materna2014-2018. México: Secretaría de Salud, 2013 [citado junio 20, 2024].Disponible en: http://cnegsr.salud.gob.mx/contenidos/descargas/SMP/ENLM_2014-2018.pdf

  7. González-de-Cosío-Martínez T, Hernández-Cordero S. Lactanciamaterna en México. Recomendaciones para el diseño y la implementaciónde una política nacional y multisectorial para la promoción, protección yapoyo de la Lactancia materna en México. Ciudad de México: AcademiaNacional de Medicina de México, 2016 [citado junio 20, 2024]. Disponibleen: https://www.anmm.org.mx/publicaciones-ultimas.php

  8. Unar-Munguía M, Hubert C, Bonvecchio-Arenas A, Vázquez-Salas RA.Acceso a servicios de salud prenatal y para primera infancia. Salud PublicaMex. 2023;65:s55-64. https://doi.org/10.21149/14796

  9. Hernández-Cordero S, Lozada-Tequeanes AL, Shamah-Levy T, Lutter C,González de Cosío T, Saturno-Hernández P, et al. Violations of the internationalcode of marketing of breast-milk substitutes in Mexico. MaternChild Nutr. 2019;15(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12682

  10. Campos AP, Hawkins SS. The association between maternalemployment and breastfeeding duration with household incomein Mexico. J Hum Lact. 2022;38(4):749-59. https://https/doi.org/10.1177/08903344211072495

  11. Vilar-Compte M, Teruel G, Flores D, Carroll GJ, Buccini GS, Pérez-Escamilla R. Costing a maternity leave cash transfer to support breastfeedingamong informally employed mexican women. Food Nutr Bull.2019;40(2):171-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572119836582

  12. Fair FJ, Morrison A, Soltani H. The impact of Baby Friendly Initiativeaccreditation: An overview of systematic reviews. Matern Child Nutr.2021;17(4):e13216. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13216

  13. Gavine A, MacGillivray S, Renfrew MJ, Siebelt L, Haggi H, McFadden A.Education and training of healthcare staff in the knowledge, attitudes andskills needed to work effectively with breastfeeding women: A systematicreview. Int Breastfeed J. 2017;12(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0097-2

  14. Sinha B, Chowdhury R, Sankar MJ, Martines J, Taneja S, Mazumder S, etal. Interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes: A systematic reviewand meta-analysis. Acta Paediatrica 2015;104(467):114-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13127

  15. Romero-Martínez M, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Cuevas-Nasu L, Bautista-Arrendondo S, Colchero MA, Gaona-Pineda EB, et al. Metodología de laEncuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2022 y planeación y diseño de laEnsanut Continua 2020-2024. Salud Publica Mex. 2022;64(5):522-9. https://doi.org/10.21149/14186

  16. Morales-Ruán C, Mayorga-Borbolla E, Arango-Angarita A, Méndez-Gómez-Humarán I, Vizuet-Vega NI. Características sociodemográficasde hogares y población de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y NutriciónContinua 2022. Salud Publica Mex. 2023;65(supl 1):S7-S14. https://doi.org/10.21149/14804

  17. Chai Y, Nandi A, Heymann J. Does extending the duration of legislatedpaid maternity leave improve breastfeeding practices? Evidencefrom 38 low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Heal.2018;3(5):e001032. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001032

  18. Victora CG, Aquino EM, Do Carmo-Leal M, Monteiro CA, BarrosFC, Szwarcwald CL. Maternal and child health in Brazil: Progress andchallenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1863-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60138-4

  19. Gonzalez Castell LD, Unar-Munguía M, Bonvechio A, Rivera-PasquelM, Lozada-Tequeanes AL, Ramírez-Silva I, et al. Cuadro 1 suplementario.Porcentaje de mujeres que recibieron información sobre lactancia maternadurante el embarazo o consulta de niños y niñas de 0 a 23 meses.Ensanut Continua 2021-2023. Figshare, 2024. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25564515.v2

  20. Vilar-Compte M, Teruel GM, Flores-Peregrina D, Carroll GJ, Buccini GS,Perez-Escamilla R. Costs of maternity leave to support breastfeeding; Brazil,Ghana and Mexico. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(6):382. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.19.229898

  21. Hoyos-Loya E, Pérez-Navarro C, Burrola-Méndez S, Hernández-CorderoS, Omaña-Guzmán I, Sachse-Aguilera M, Ancira-Moreno M. Barriersto promoting breastfeeding in primary health care in Mexico: a qualitativeperspective. Front Nutr. 2024; 9(10):1278280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1278280

  22. Bonvecchio A, Lozada-Tequeanes AL, Kim-Herrera E, Pacheco-MirandaS, Unar-Munguía M, Rivera-Dommarco J, et al. Atención a la salud y nutricióndurante los primeros mil días. Salud Publica Mex. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21149/15854

  23. Unar-Munguía M, Santos-Guzmán A, Mota-Castillo PJ, Ceballos-Rasgado M, Tolentino-Mayo L, Sachse-Aguilera M, et al. Digital marketing offormula and baby food negatively influences breast feeding and complementaryfeeding: a cross-sectional study and video recording of parentalexposure in Mexico. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e009904. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009904

  24. Unar-Munguía M, Stern D, Colchero MA, González de Cosío T. Theburden of suboptimal breastfeeding in Mexico: Maternal health outcomesand costs. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12661

  25. Colchero MA, Contreras-Loya D, Lopez-Gatell H, De Cosío TG. Thecosts of inadequate breastfeeding of infants in Mexico. Am J Clin Nutr[Internet]. 2015;101(3):579-86 [citado junio 20, 2024]. Disponible en:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733643




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

salud publica mex. 2024;66