medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Archivos de Medicina de Urgencia de México

ISSN 2594-3006 (Electronic)
ISSN 2007-1752 (Print)
Archivos de Medicina de Urgencia de México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med Urg Mex 2024; 16 (2)

Impact of active versus passive humidification on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit of the Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Center Medical National The Raza, IMSS

Sanabria-Cordero D, Trejo-Rosas S, Mendez-Jesus IA, Silva EMC
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/117752

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/117752
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/117752

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 72-80
PDF size: 917.79 Kb.


Key words:

VAP, Ventilation Associated Pneumonia, HAIs, Healthcare Associated Infections, Active Humidification, Pressure Monometer, ICU, Intensive Care Unit, COT, Orotracheal Cannula, Mechanical Ventilatory Assistance (MVA).

ABSTRACT

Introduction. VAP is the most frequent HAIs infection in our country, which generates more costs and hospital stay, as well as an increase in morbidity and mortality of patients admitted to public and private hospital units. It is undoubtedly the number one enemy to combat for health professionals and a goal to consider in the MUEC (Single Quality Assessment Model).
Objective. To evaluate the differences in incidence of VAP, days of stay and days of MV, in critically ill patients treated in the ICU (Intensive Care Unit) with active and passive humidification. Analysis period November 2021 to August 2024.
Material and methods. Intervention: all mechanically ventilated patients were fitted with a continuous active humidification circuit and a manometer for continuous COT pressure measurement, expectoration cultures were taken upon admission, 72 hours after and during MV during their stay in the ICU, with monthly registration from March 2023 to August 2024.
Results. A decrease in days of stay in the ICU, duration of MV and decrease in incidence of VAP was observed in the group with active humidification and continuous manometry versus the group with passive humidification without continuous manometry: Stay: 2.5 to 10, versus 4.5-17.5 with a p value 0.009. Duration of MV: 4-14 with average 7 days versus 5-17.5 average 10.0, p 0.024. VAP occurred in 5 patients (5.6%) and 84 (94.4%) did not present it in the active humidification group, versus 16 patients (19.8%) who presented it in the passive humidification group, with a HR (CI95 %) of 3.51 (1.35-9-17) with a value of p0.005.
Discussion and conclusion. In our study, a decrease in days of stay, days of MV and incidence of VAP was observed in the ICU when using active humidification and continuous manometry.


REFERENCES

  1. Isakow W, Kollef M. Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia:An Evidence-Based Approach of Modifiable Risk Factors. Seminarsin Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2006; 27 (1): 5 – 17

  2. Lacherade JC et al. Impact of Humidification Systems on Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: A Randomized Multicenter Trial. Am JRespir Crit Care Med. 2005; Nov 15; 172(10):1276-82.

  3. Pinsky MR. Brixhard L. Mancebo J. Appplied Phisiology in IntensiveCare Medicine. Springer-Verlag; 2006

  4. Williams R, Rankin N, Smith T, Galler D, Seakins P. Relationshipbetween the Humidity and Temperature of Inspired Gas and theFunction of the Airway Mucosa. Crit.Care Med. 1996; 24:11:1920-1929.

  5. Impact of Humidification Systems on Ventilator-associated Pneumonia:A Randomized Multicenter Trial. Am J Respir Crit CareMed. 2005

  6. SamirJaber MD et al. Long-term Effects of Diferent HumidificationSystems on Endotracheal Tube Patency. Anesthesiology 2004;100:782-8.

  7. Cruz CL. Teoría y praxis investigativa, Centro de Investigación yDesarrollo • CID / Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina.Vol.3 - No. 2, 2008; p 73-82

  8. Picazo L, Domínguez MJ. Humidificación y calentamiento de losgases en ventilación mecánica. Esquinas AM, editor. Cuidadosrespiratorios en críticos: bases y principios, Vol. 1, 1a ed. Barcelona:Asoc Inter Vent; 2009.p 285-92

  9. Gross JL, Park GR. Humidification of inspired gases during mechanicalventilation. Min Anest. 2012;78:496-502

  10. Kola A, Eckmanns T. Efficacy of heat and moisture exchangerspreventing ventilator-associeted pneumonia: meta-analysis of randomizedcontrolled trials. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:5-11

  11. Niel-Weise BS, Wille JS. Humidification policies for mechanicallyventilated intensive care patients and prevention of ventilator-associatedpneumonia. A systematic review of randomized controlledtrials. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65:687-92

  12. Vargas M, Chiumello D. Ball L. Pelosi P, et. al. Heat and moinstureexchangers (HMEs) and heated humidifiers (HH) in adult criticallyill patients: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regressionof randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2017;21:123

  13. Bassi GL, Ferrer M, Marti JD, Comaru T, Torres A. Ventilator-associatedpneumonia. Semin Resp Crit Care Med. 2014;35:469-81

  14. Manual de Procedimientos Estandarizado para la Vigilancia Epidemiológicade las Infecciones Asociadas a la Atención de la Salud.Red Hospitalaria de Vigilancia Epidemiológica. Junio 2024;1-100

  15. Córdova VH, Peña J, Quintero M.Neumonía asociada con ventiladoren pacientes de la unidad de cuidados intensivos.Med Int Mex2011;27(2):160-167.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Med Urg Mex. 2024;16