medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica

2024, Number 52

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2024; 13 (52)

Implementation of a low-cost model for training on ultrasound-guided vascular access

Ilescas-Martínez I, Santiago-López AT, Castro-Reyes LO, Pinacho-Colmenares MJ, Navarro-Hernández Q, Isario-Martínez JY

Language: Spanish
References: 39
Page: 62-73
PDF size: 1045.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Vascular access procedures are an essential competency for medical residents, with ultrasoundguided insertion being an effective and safe method. There are numerous simulators for central venous catheter insertion, although many of them are inaccessible for educational institutions.
Objective: To evaluate the implementation of a low-cost model for training in central venous catheter insertion.
Method: A quasi-experimental educational intervention was carried out with resident doctors from the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca
Results: 33 medical residents were trained, 54.5% of whom were male. 72.7% were familiar with the correct technique for placing ultrasound-guided vascular accesses, and 51.5% felt confident to perform this task before the training. Subsequently, 69.7% considered that the model was analogous to human anatomy and 90.9% reported that the device provided a clear ultrasound image of the structures. In addition, 81.8% valued the model as suitable for training residents in the placement of ultrasoundguided vascular accesses. The design of accessible simulators is crucial in developing countries to increase confidence and speed up the learning curve of the staff in training. Low-cost models would facilitate the acquisition of clinical skills, which would result in an improvement in quality care for health service users.
Conclusions: Our model facilitates this learning without the need for large budgets or an increase in the risk of complications when performing this type of procedures, especially for those with little or no experience in the placement of ultrasound-guided central venous accesses.


REFERENCES

  1. Kolikof J, Peterson K, Baker AM. Central Venous Catheter.En: StatPearls. 2022.

  2. Seifert H, Jansen B, Widmer AF, Farr BM. Central VenousCatheter. En: StatPearls. Treasure Island, Florida: StatPearlsPublishing; 2022. p. 293-326.

  3. Hoffman T, Du Plessis M, Prekupec MP, Gielecki J, ZuradaA, Shane Tubbs R, et al. Ultrasound-guided central venouscatheterization: a review of the relevant anatomy, technique,complications, and anatomical variations. Clin Anat [Internet].2017 [citado el 29 de mayo de 2023];30:237-50. Disponibleen: 10.1002/ca.22768

  4. Chawla R, Varma V, Kansal S. Central line placement [Internet].StatPearls. Trasure Island, Florida: StatPearls Publishing;2012. p. 723-33. Disponible en: 10.1007/978-81-322-0535-7_91

  5. Miguelena Bobadilla JM, Morales-García D, Iturburu BelmonteI, Alcázar Montero JA, Serra Aracil X, Docobo Durantez F,et al. General Surgery Training in Spain: Core Curriculumand Specific Areas of Training. Cirugía Española (EnglishEd [Internet]. 2015 [citado el 29 de mayo de 2023];93:147-51.Disponible en: 10.1016/J.CIRENG.2014.10.006

  6. Curriculum Outline for General Surgery [Internet]. UnitedStates of America; 2022 [citado el 29 de mayo de 2023]. Disponibleen: https://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?scre_booklet

  7. Tetzlaff JE, Warltier DC. Assessment of Competency inAnesthesiology. Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2007 [citado el29 de mayo de 2023];106:812-25. Disponible en: 10.1097/01.ANES.0000264778.02286.4D

  8. Vinagre R, Tanaka P, Tardelli MA. Competency-based anesthesiologyteaching: comparison of programs in Brazil,Canada and the United States. Brazilian J Anesthesiol [Internet].2021 [citado el 29 de mayo de 2023];71:162. Disponibleen: 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.026

  9. Iobst W, Aagaard E, Bazari H, Brigham T, Bush RW, CaverzagieK, et al. Internal Medicine Milestones [Internet]. 2021[citado el 29 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: 10.4300/JGME-05-01s1-03

  10. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Programaacadémico PUEM [Internet]. Ciudad de México; 2022 [citadoel 29 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/25khrq4y

  11. Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía General, Consejo Mexicanode Cirugía General. Programa de Referencia para laFormación de Cirujanos Generales en México [Internet].Ciudad de México; 2022. Disponible en: https://amcg.org.mx/download/programa-de-referencia-para-la-formacionde-cirujanos-generales-en-mexico/#

  12. Huang GC, Smith CC, Gordon CE, Feller-Kopman DJ, DavisRB, Phillips RS, et al. Beyond the comfort zone: Residentsassess their comfort performing inpatient medicalprocedures. Am J Med [Internet]. 2006 [citado el 29 demayo de 2023];119:71.e17-71.e24. Disponible en: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.08.007

  13. Huang GC, Newman LR, Schwartzstein RM, Clardy PF,Feller-Kopman D, Irish JT, et al. Procedural Competencein Internal Medicine Residents: Validity of a Central VenousCatheter Insertion Assessment Instrument. Acad Med[Internet]. 2009 [citado el 29 de mayo de 2023];84:1127-34.Disponible en: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181acf491

  14. Huang GC, Smith CC, York M, Weingart SN. Asking forhelp: internal medicine residents’ use of a medical procedureservice. J Hosp Med [Internet]. 2009 [citado el 29 de mayode 2023];4:404-9. Disponible en: 10.1002/JHM.434

  15. Saugel B, Scheeren TWL, Teboul JL. Ultrasound-guidedcentral venous catheter placement: A structured review andrecommendations for clinical practice. Crit Care [Internet].2017 [citado el 29 de mayo de 2023];21:1-11. Disponible en:10.1186/S13054-017-1814-Y/FIGURES/7

  16. Caballero AF, Villarreal K, Caballero AF, Villarreal K. Ultrasoundfor central vascular access. A safety concept that isrenewed day by day: review. Colomb J Anestesiol [Internet].2018 [citado el 29 de mayo de 2023];46:32-8. Disponible en:10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000043

  17. Liu Y, Li J, Chang J, Xiao S, Pei W, Wang L. A new inexpensiveultrasound-guided central venous catheterization simulationmodel. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2023 [citado el 29 de mayode 2023];23. Disponible en: 10.1186/s12909-023-04080-z

  18. Álvarez JML, Quevedo OP, López-Manteola SAG, EstebanJN, Ferrer JFL, Villegas DLL, et al. Revision of Training Modelson Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access: Presentationof an Animal Model. Ultrasound Imaging - Curr Top [Internet].2022 [citado el 29 de mayo de 2023]; Disponible en:10.5772/INTECHOPEN.101901

  19. Dávila-Cervantes A. Simulación en Educación Médica. Investigen Educ Médica [Internet]. 2014;3:100-5. Disponibleen: 10.1016/S2007-5057(14)72733-4

  20. Ubillús Arriola de Pimentel G, Ubillús Arriola de PimentelG. La simulación clínica en la enseñanza de la medicina.Horiz Médico [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 29 de mayo de2023];22:e1766. Disponible en: 10.24265/HORIZMED.2022.V22N1.00

  21. Herrera-Aliaga E, Estrada LD. Trends and Innovations ofSimulation for Twenty First Century Medical Education.Front Public Heal [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 30 de mayo de2023];10:367. Disponible en: 10.3389/FPUBH.2022.619769/BIBTEX

  22. Fletcher JD, Wind AP. Cost considerations in using simulationsfor medical training. Mil Med [Internet]. 2013;178:37-46. Disponible en: 10.7205/milmed-d-13-00258

  23. Good RJ, Mashburn D, Jekich E, Miller K, Leroue MK,Woods J, et al. Simulation-Based Training for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Placement in PediatricPatients. MedEdPORTAL J Teach Learn Resour [Internet].2022 [citado el 30 de mayo de 2023];18:11276. Disponible en:10.15766/MEP_2374-8265.11276

  24. Andreatta P, Mangrulkar R, Marsh M, Chen Y, Cho K,Thompson M. Simulation-based Training in UltrasoundAssisted Central Venous Catheterization. En: Simulation inHealthcare [Internet]. 2007. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/2bdamw2a

  25. Ballard HA, Rivera A, Tsao M, Phillips M, Robles A, HajdukJ, et al. Use of an ultrasound-guided intravenous catheterinsertion simulation-based mastery learning curriculum toimprove paediatric anaesthesia care. BJA Open [Internet].2022 [citado el 30 de mayo de 2023];4:100101. Disponibleen: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100101

  26. Denadai R, Toledo AP, Bernades DM, Diniz FD, Eid FB, LanfranchiLMM de M, et al. Simulation-based ultrasound-guidedcentral venous cannulation training program. Acta CirúrgicaBras [Internet]. 2014 [citado el 30 de mayo de 2023];29:132-44.Disponible en: 10.1590/S0102-86502014000200010

  27. Pérez-Quevedo O, López-Álvarez JM, Limiñana-Cañal JM,Loro-Ferrer JF. Design and application of model for trainingultrasound-guided vascular cannulation in pediatric patientspatients.Med Intensiva [Internet]. 2016 [citado el 30 de mayo de2023];40:364-70. Disponible en: 10.1016/J.MEDIN.2015.11.005

  28. Ault MJ, Rosen BT, Ault B. The use of tissue models for vascularaccess training: Phase I of the procedural patient safetyinitiative. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:514-7.

  29. Sawaya RD, Mrad S, Rajha E, Saleh R, Rice J. Simulation-basedcurriculum development: lessons learnt in Global Health education.BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 16 de juliode 2023];21:1-6. Disponible en: 10.1186/S12909-020-02430-9/TABLES/2

  30. Sanchez MG, Kumar V. Curriculum Design in Medical Simulation.En: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

  31. Martinerie L, Rasoaherinomenjanahary F, Ronot M, Fournier P,Dousset B, Tesnière A, et al. Health care simulation in developingcountries and low-resource situations. J Contin Educ HealthProf [Internet]. 2018 [citado el 18 de julio de 2023];38:205-12.Disponible en: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000211

  32. Abas Fatema Zehra Juma T. Advances in Medical Educationand Practice Dovepress Benefits of simulation trainingin medical education Dear editor. Adv Med Educ Pract[Internet]. 2016 [citado el 18 de julio de 2023];7:399-400.Disponible en: 10.2147/AMEP.S110386

  33. Lima PHL, Cordeiro EB, Araújo GG, Vasconcelos PTF deG, Cruz SMLT, Freitas GRC, et al. Simulators for vascularaccess training: an integrative review. Res Soc Dev [Internet].2022 [citado el 11 de marzo de 2024];11:e313111638389-e313111638389. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/226lazfs

  34. Chao SL, Chen KC, Lin LW, Wang TL, Chong CF. Ultrasoundphantoms made of gelatin covered with hydrocolloid skindressing. J Emerg Med. 2013;45:240-3.

  35. Rippey JCR, Blanco P, Carr PJ. An affordable and easily constructedmodel for training in ultrasound-guided vascularaccess. J Vasc Access. 2015;16:422-7.

  36. Kendall JL, Faragher JP. Ultrasound-guided central venous access:a homemade phantom for simulation. CJEM. 2007;9:371-3.

  37. Evans L V, Dodge KL, Shah TD, Kaplan LJ, Siegel MD, MooreCL, et al. Simulation training in central venous catheterinsertion: improved performance in clinical practice. AcadMed. 2010;85:1462-9.

  38. Makeeva V, Gullett JP, Dowla S, Olson K, Resuehr D. Evaluationof Homemade Ballistic Gelatin Phantoms as a Low-CostAlternative to Commercial-Grade Phantoms in Medical Education.Med Sci Educ [Internet]. 2016;26:307-16. Disponibleen: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0258-3

  39. Palmer JM, Little A, Tran QV. Cost-Effective Training Modelsin Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Medical Students inEmergency Medicine: An Evaluation of Current Resources.Cureus [Internet]. 2022 [citado el 11 de marzo de 2024];14.Disponible en: /pmc/articles/PMC9064708/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com