Main criticism and consequences of bipolitization in the field of mental health, the psychoanalytic and neuropsychoanalytic clinic

Alma Jessica Rosas Juan

2024, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2024; 27 (4)

Main criticism and consequences of bipolitization in the field of mental health, the psychoanalytic and neuropsychoanalytic clinic

Rosas JAJ

Full text

How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 1758-1774
PDF size: 383.51 Kb.

ABSTRACT

In this paper, a critical analysis of the proposal formulated in terms arising from social theory is developed, specifically from the perspective of biopolitics. to disciplines in charge of mental health, namely psychiatry, psychology in general, psychoanalysis and neuropsychoanalysis in particular. In the first instance, it is established what is meant by biopolitics, secondly, some of the consequences that this vision has in the field of politics, health and therapeutic clinics, as well as the concept of health and cure, are mentioned. Finally, we allude to the repercussions of the paradigmatic change proposed by neuropsychoanalysis in the clinical setting.

REFERENCES

Aguilera, E. P., 2010. Biopolítica, Poder y Sujeto en Michel Foucault. Revista deFilosofía, derecho y Política, Issue 11, pp. 27- 42.
Campalans, L., 2006. Eppur si muove: Notas sobre el sujeto del psicoanálisis. RevitaUruguay de Psicoanálisis, Volumen 103, pp. 160-171.
Canguilhem, G., 2004. La salud: Concepto Vulgar y Cuestión Filosófica. En: Escritossobre la Medicina. Buenos Aires Argentina: Amorrortu, pp. 69-48.
Eidelsztein, A., 2003. imoagenda /LetrasViva. [En línea].Available at:http://www.imagoagenda.com/articulo.asp?idarticulo=704 [Último acceso: 30agosto 2018].
Eidelsztein, A., 2010. Apertura sociedad Psicoanalítica. [En línea] Available at:https://www.google.com.mx/search?q=programa+de+investigaci%C3%B3n+cient%C3%ADfica+apertura&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwja5tqIz7jdAhUBDq0KHUi9D H4QBQglKAA&biw=1366&bih=662 [Último acceso: 13 09 2018].
Eidelsztein, A., 2009. El psicoanálisis por venir. Buenos Aires, s.n.
Esposito, R., 2008. -bíos, Biopolítica y Filosofía. En: Bíos, Biopolítica y Filosofía.Argentina, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, pp. 23-41.
Foucault, M., 1994. Curso del 14 de enero de 1976. En: Microfísica del Poder. s.l.:LaPiqueta, p. 140.
Han, B.-C., 2014. Psicopolítica. 1a ed. Barcelona, España: Herder. Han, B. C., 2014.Psicopolítica. Barcelona España: Herder.
Rodríguez, P., 2010. La medicalización como estrategia política. A Parte Rei, Issue70, pp. 1-27.
Roudinesco, E., 2005. El paciente, el terapeuta y el Estado. Argentina Buenos Aires:Siglo Veintiuno.
Solís, G. L., 2012. Comentario de Agamben a la noción de Biopolítica de Foucault.Psicología y Sociedad Filosofía de, pp. 8-17.