Lujan BJ, Adriazola IMM, de Moraes MNCL, Perinazzo SV, Micheline SD, Coelho GM

Language: English
References: 18
Page: 32-42
PDF size: 422.70 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this integrative review is to investigate the possibility of aligning three-dimensional intraoral scanner data with facial mobile device data, as well as comparing the effectiveness of AI-based search with manual search methods. This investigation adhered to the PRISMA guidelines aiming to answer the PICO question: “Does the facial and intraoral three-dimensional technologies are compatible and clinically applicable in oral rehabilitation?”. Was employed a search strategy incorporating specific keywords ("dental", "intraoral", "photogrammetry", "stereo photo", "scanner", "three-dimensional", "stereophotogrammetry", "scan", "virtual articulators", "facebow", "face", "facial") within multiple databases (Pubmed, BVS, and Scielo), including artificial intelligence (Scite.ai). Of the 7128 initially identified articles, 4 articles of manual search were included but none article of the artificial intelligence website were added. Among the most used: at the intraoral scanners were the TRIOS (3shape) (n=2) and for facial images the Apple Inc. cell phones (n=2). The most frequently reported software was Bellus3D (Bellus3D Inc.) with particular emphasis on the georeferencing tactic software. Several commonalities were observed, including the requirement for a 30cm spacing during cell phone-based extraoral scanning, the necessity for multiple captures, and the inclusion of landmarks and/or perioral and nasal scans. Manual searching is still the gold standard scientific searching data; Both stereophotogrammetry and mobile device scan can be used for facial scanning and the files can be integrated by utilizing georeferencing tactic software.

REFERENCES

1. Khurshid Z. Digital Dentistry: Transformationof Oral Health and Dental Educationwith Technology. Eur J Dent 2023; 17: 943-4

2. Perez-Giugovaz M.G., Park S.H., Revilla-Leon M. Three-dimensional virtual representationby superimposing facial and intraoraldigital scans with an additively manufacturedintraoral scan body. J Prosthet Dent 2020;126: 459

3. Kordaß B., Gärtner C., Söhnel A., BislerA., Voß G., Bockholt U., Seipel S., et al.The virtual articulator in dentistry: conceptand development. Dent Clin 2002; 46 (3):

4. 493-5064. de Caxias F.P., Dos Santos D.M., BannwartL.C., de Moraes Melo Neto C.L., Goiato M.C.Classification, history, and future prospectsof maxillofacial prosthesis. Int J Dent 2019;1: 8657619

5. Ye H., Ye J., Wang S., Wang Z., Geng J.,Wang Y., Zhou Y. Comparison of the accuracy(trueness and precision) of virtual dentofacialpatients digitized by three different methodsbased on 3D facial and dental images. JProsthet Dent 2022; 3913 (22): 99-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.035

6. Mangano F., Mangano C., Margiani B.,Admakin O. Combining Intraoral andFace Scans for the Design and Fabricationof Computer-Assisted Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Implant-Supported Bars for Maxillary Overdentures.Scanning 2019; 2019: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4274715

7. Alshadidi A.A.F., Alshahrani A.A., AldosariL.I.N., Chaturvedi S., Saini R.S., HassanS.A.B., et al. Investigation on the applicationof artificial intelligence in prosthodontics.Appl Sci 2023; 13 (8): 5004

8. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M.,Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., etal. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updatedguideline for reporting systematic reviews. JClin Epidemiol 2021; 134: 178-89

9. Mai H., Lee D.H. The Effect of Perioral Scanand Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracyof Virtual Dentofacial Integration: StereophotogrammetryVersus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning. Int J EnvironRes Public Health 2021; 18 (1):229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010229

10. Li J., Att W., Chen Z., Lepidi L., Wang H.L.,Joda T. Prosthetic articulator-based implantrehabilitation virtual patient: A techniquebridging implant surgery and reconstructivedentistry. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 130 (1): 8-13

11. Jreige C.S., Kimura R.N., Segundo Â.R.T.C.,Coachman C., Sesma N. Esthetic treatmentplanning with digital animation of the smiledynamics: A technique to create a 4-dimensionalvirtual patient. J Prosthet Dent 2022;

12. 128 (2): 130-812. Hong S.J., Noh K. Setting the sagittal condylarinclination on a virtual articulator by usinga facial and intraoral scan of the protrusiveinterocclusal position: A dental technique. JProsthet Dent 2021; 125 (3): 392-5.

13. Sun A., Yang Y., Gao H., Lin W.S., Chen L.,Tan J. Integrating facial and intraoral scansfor digital esthetic and occlusal design: atechnical report. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 30 (8):729-33.

14. Conejo J., Dayo A.F., Syed A.Z., MupparapuM. The digital clone: intraoral scanning, facescans and cone beam computed tomographyintegration for diagnosis and treatmentplanning. Dental Clinics 2021; 65 (3): 529-53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2021.02.011

15. Bechtold T.E., Goz T.G., Schaupp E., KossB., Godt A., Reinert S., Berneburg M.Integration of a maxillary model into facialsurface stereophotogrammetry. J OrofacOrthop 2012; 73 (2): 126-37.

16. Gallardo Y.N., Salazar-Gamarra R., BohnerL., De Oliveira J.I., Dib L.L., Sesma N.Evaluation of the 3D error of 2 face-scanningsystems: An in vitro analysis. J Prosthet Dent2023; 129 (4): 630-636

17. Ritschl L.M., Wolff K.D., Erben P., Grill F.D.Simultaneous, radiation-free registration ofthe dentoalveolar position and the face bycombining 3D photography with a portablescanner and impression-taking. Head FaceMed 2019; 15 (1): 1-9

18. Andrews J., Alwafi A., Bichu Y.M., PliskaB.T., Mostafa N., Zou B. Validation of threedimensionalfacial imaging captured withsmartphone-based photogrammetry applicationin comparison to stereophotogrammetrysystem. Heliyon 2023; 9 (5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15834