medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo

ISSN 1991-9395 (Electronic)
ISSN 1608-6384 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo 2022; 23 (3)

A protocol for the ergonomic evaluation of the thermal environment in coffee roasting company

García RNV, Andrade GMD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page:
PDF size: 1033.37 Kb.


Key words:

thermal endowment, thermal stress, thermal con-form, ergonomic evaluation protocol.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The standardizing framework for occupational safety and health currently valid in Cuba establishes the use of indicators to evaluate the thermal environment; the most used is the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) index to evaluate thermal stress in environments with high thermal overload. Objective: To apply protocol for the ergonomic evaluation of the thermal environment in view of an ergonomic intervention in a coffee roasting company. Methods: For the ergonomic evaluation, a protocol with simul-taneous application of indicators was used to assess whether production workers performed their activities under conditions of thermal stress and physiological overload. Thermal stress in hot environments was evaluated with the WBGT index, while the thermal overload index was used for the degree of thermal overload. In addition, the degree of comfort in climate-controlled sites was evaluated using the Fanger’s mean rating index, compared with the heat overload index. Results: The workers were exposed to critical heat conditions in their work environment, but did not suffer from heat stress because the established work and rest regimes for each task or activity involving risk were correctly complied with. Conclusions: The simultaneous use of both indicators allowed a more detailed interpretation of the results obtained, as well as quantifying the time the worker spent in an environment with high thermal overload. This information should be taken into account when carrying out an adequate intervention in the indus-try.


REFERENCES

  1. Cújar-Vertel AC, Julio-Espitia GP. Evaluación de las condiciones térmicas ambientales del área de producción en una panadería en Cereté (Cór-doba). Entramado [Internet]. 2016 [acceso 15/02/2020];12(1):332-43. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_artt xt&pid=S1900-38032016000100021.

  2. Oficina Nacional de Normalización. NC 869:2011. Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo. Am-bientes térmicos calurosos. Estimación del estrés térmico en el trabajo basado en el Índice WBGT (temperatura de globo y bulbo húmedo). Cuba [Internet]. 2011 [acceso 04/01/2020]. Disponible en http://www.nconline.cubaindustria.cu/Manual/Normas-vigentes-Octubre2021.rar.

  3. Kjellstrom T, Briggs D, Freyberg C, Lemke B, Otto M, Hyatt O. Heat, human performance, and occupational health: A key issue for the assess-ment of global climate change impacts. Annu. Rev. Public Health. [Internet]. 2016 [acceso 20/03/2020];37:97-112. Disponible en: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-publheath-032315-021740.

  4. Kjellstrom T, Freyberg C, Lemke B, Otto M, Briggs D. Estimating population heat exposure and impacts on working people in conjunction with climate change. Int. J. Biometeorol. [Inter-net]. 2017 [acceso 02/03/2020];62(3):291-306. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-017-1407-0

  5. Yi W, Chan APC. Effects of heat stress on con-struction labor productivity in Hong Kong: a case study of rebar workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2017 [acceso 4/2/2020];14(9):1055. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28895899.

  6. Gutiérrez RE, Guerra KB, Gutiérrez MD. Eva-luación de riesgo por estrés térmico en trabajado-res de los procesos de incineración y secado de una empresa de tableros contrachapados. Infor-mación Tecnológica [Internet]. 2018 [acceso 05/03/2020];29(3):133-44. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718076420180003001339.

  7. National safety council summer heat can be deadly for construction workers, CPWR Cau-tions. [Internet]. 2017 [acceso 09/01/2020]. Dis-ponible en: http://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/15778-summer-heat-can-be-deadly-for-construction-workers.

  8. Yang Y, Chan APC. Heat stress intervention research in construction: gaps and recommenda-tions. Industrial Health [Internet]. 2017 [acceso 10/2/2020];55(3):201-09. Disponible en: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28111405.

  9. Mondelo P R, Gregori Torada E, Comas Úriz S, Castejón Vilella E, Bartolomé Lacambra E. Er-gonomía 2. Confort y estrés térmico. 3 ed. Barce-lona. España: Alfaomega; 2015.

  10. Wittbrodt MT, Sawka MN, Mizelle JC, Wheaton LA, Millard-Stafford ML. Exercise-heat stress with and without water replacement alters brainstructures and impairs visuomotor performance. Physiol Rep [Internet]. 2018 [acceso 05/03/20206:e13805. Disponible en: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30136401.

  11. Sheng R, Li C, Wang Q, Yang L, Bao J, Wang K et al. Does hot weather affect work-related in-jury? A case-crossover study in Guangzhou, Chi-na. International Journal of Hygiene and Envi-ronmental Health [Internet]. 2018 [acceso 05/03/2020];221(3):423-8. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1438463917308878.

  12. Al-Bouwarthan M, Quinn MM, Kriebel D, Wegman DH. Assessment of Heat Stress Expo-sure among Construction Workers in the Hot De-sert Climate of Saudi Arabia. Annals of Work Exposures and Health [Internet]. 2019 [acceso 05/03/2020];63(5):505-20. Disponible en: http://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/63/5/505/5485430.

  13. Chan APC, Yi W. Heat stress and its impacts on occupational health and performance. Indoor Built Environ. [Internet]. 2016 [acceso 05/03/2020];25(1):3-5. Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1420326X15622724.

  14. Gao C, Kuklane K, Östergren PO, Kjellstrom T. Occupational heat stress assessment and protecti-ve strategies in the context of climate change. Int J Biometeorol [Internet]. 2018 [acceso 25/02/2020];62(3):359-71. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-017-1352-y.

  15. Roghanchi P, Kocsis KC. Challenges in selecting an appropriate heat stress index to protect work-ers in hot and humid underground mines. Saf Health Work [Internet]. 2018 [acceso 05/03/2020];9(1):10-6. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117300318.

  16. Yang YC, Wei MC, Hong SJ. Evaluation of occupation hot exposure in industrial workplaces in a subtropical country. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health [Internet]. 2017 [acceso 05/03/2020];30(3):379-95. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28481372.

  17. Suárez R, Baqués R. Evaluación del estrés tér-mico en una empresa de producción textil. Revis-ta Cubana de Salud y Trabajo 2004 [acceso 05/03/2020];5(1):20-5. Disponible en: https://silo.tips/download/ing-rugiere-suarez-cabrera-1-lic-raul-baques-merino-2-tec-rafael-suarez-batista.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo. 2022;23