medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de la Facultad de Medicina UNAM

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Fac Med UNAM 2025; 68 (3)

What is the Evidence Pyramid?

Almiray SAL, Clark P, Merino FDV, Sánchez ML, Guagnelli MMÁ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 30-39
PDF size: 751.43 Kb.


Key words:

Evidence, pyramid, medicine, health care, researching.

ABSTRACT

Ongoing professional development is essential for healthcare providers to enhance clinical decision-making based on scientific evidence. Every year, millions of studies are published, making it crucial for professionals to develop the skills needed to critically assess the validity and applicability of this vast body of information. The evidence pyramid is a widely used tool that classifies different types of studies according to their scientific rigor, placing systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the top, as they are considered the most reliable sources of evidence. At the base are studies with lower levels of evidence, such as case reports and expert opinions. However, even the most robust studies have limitations that must be carefully evaluated.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM), which emerged in the 1980s, seeks to integrate the best available scientific evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. The traditional evidence pyramid has evolved over time, addressing the limitations of existing studies and proposing dynamic approaches to more accurately assess the quality of evidence. The GRADE system and recent adaptations of the pyramid have strengthened the process of critical appraisal, enabling more informed and less biased clinical decisions.
The adoption of evidence-based practices requires healthcare professionals to develop competencies in the use of tools for critically evaluating scientific information. Additionally, the incorporation of new technologies—such as artificial intelligence for data management—will play a key role in enhancing the quality of clinical practice and patient care.


REFERENCES

  1. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper, the basics of evidencebasedmedicine and healthcare. 6ta ed. London: J wiley andSons; 2019.

  2. Lifshitz A. La nueva clínica. 1era ed. México: IntersistemasEditores; 2014.

  3. Pérez-Rodrigo C. ¿Cómo trasladar la evidencia científicaa los consumidores? = How to translate scientific evidenceto consumers? Rev Esp Comun Salud. 2016;7:43-1.

  4. Castañeda C. La investigación y la pirámide de la evidencia.Uniandes Episteme Revista digital de Ciencia, Tecnologíae Innovación. 2014;1:257-6.

  5. Chloros GD, Prodromidis AD, Giannoudis P V. Has anythingchanged in Evidence-Based Medicine? Injury. 2023;54:1-6.

  6. Gelardi F, Kirienko M, Sollini M. Climbing the steps of theevidence-based medicine pyramid: highlights from Annalsof Nuclear Medicine 2019. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.2020;48:1293-01.

  7. Thoma A, Eaves F. A brief history of evidence-based medicine(EBM) and the contributions of Dr David Sackett.Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:261-3.

  8. Sackett D. How to read clinical journals: I. why to readthem and how to start reading them critically. Can MedAssoc J. 1981;124:555-8.

  9. Haynes R. How to read clinical journals: II. To learn abouta diagnostic test. Can Med Assoc J. 1981;124:703-10.

  10. Tugwell P. How to read clinical journals: III. To learn theclinical course and prognosis of disease. Can Med Assoc J.1981;124: 869-72.

  11. Kilgore S. How to read clinical journals: IV. To determineetiology or causation. Can Med Assoc J. 1981;124:985-90.

  12. Sackett D. How to read clinical journals: V: To distinguishuseful from useless or even harmful therapy. Can Med AssocJ. 1981;124:1156-62.

  13. Sutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, Booth A. Meeting the reviewfamily: exploring review types and associated informationretrieval requirements. Health Info Libr J. 2019;36:202-22.

  14. Caldwell PH, Bennett T. Easy guide to conducting a systematicreview. J Paediatr Child Health. 2020;56:853-6.

  15. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T,Page MJ, Welch VA. Cochrane Handbook for SystematicReviews of Interventions version 6.4 [Internet]. Cochrane;2023 [modificado ago 2024; consultado 19 sept 2024]. Disponibleen: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

  16. Manterola C, Asenjo-Lobos C, Otzen T. Jerarquización dela evidencia. Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendaciónde uso actual Hierarchy of evidence. Levels of evidenceand grades of recommendation from current use. RevChilena Infectol. 2014;31:705-18.

  17. Rosner AL. Evidence-based medicine: revisiting the pyramidof priorities. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012;16:42-9.

  18. Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidencepyramid. Evid Based Med. 2016;21:125-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Fac Med UNAM . 2025;68