2025, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
salud publica mex 2025; 67 (3)
Operational criteria related to biobank research practices: Mesoamerican Project
Basagoitia-Echalar A, Domínguez-Esponda R, López-Ridaura R, Ángeles-Llerenas A
Language: English
References: 35
Page: 239-247
PDF size: 250.80 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective. To investigate the implementation of international
ethics guidelines in Research ethics committees (RECs)
to address ethical considerations in biobank research in
Mesoamerican countries, given the importance of biobank
research and the role of RECs in its evaluation.
Materials
and methods. Based on a 2018 study that used an
online survey to assess training needs of RECs in Colombia,
Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Mexico, this paper describes
information on RECs operating procedures related to biobank
research reported by 55 participants.
Results. More
than 70% of participants reported frequently requesting key
components of biobank research. Specifying the time and
location of sample and data storage was the least reported.
43.6% used a specific consent form, while 41.8% identified
gaps in knowledge regarding the inclusion of residual samples.
Recontact policies varied across countries and were limited
by sample anonymity.
Conclusión. RECs in Mesoamerican
countries lack clear policies on biobanks and have deficiencies
in informed consent and governance. Regulatory advances and
ongoing training are needed to protect participants’ rights.
REFERENCES
Coppola L, Cianflone A, Grimaldi AM, Incoronato M, Bevilacqua P, MessinaF, et al. Biobanking in health care: evolution and future directions. JTransl Med. 2019;17(1):172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1922-3
Malsagova K, Kopylov A, Stepanov A, Butkova T, Sinitsyna A, Izotov A, etal. Biobanks. A platform for scientific and biomedical research. Diagnostics.2020;10(7):485. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070485
Frascarelli C, Bonizzi G, Musico CR, Mane E, Cassi C, Guerini-Rocco E,et al. Revolutionizing cancer research: the impact of artificial intelligencein digital biobanking. J Pers Med. 2023;13(9):1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091390
Dabrock P, Taupitz J, Ried J. Trust in biobanking. Dealing with ethical,legal and social issues in an emerging field of biotechnolog y. New York:Springer, 2012.
Gille F, Axler R, Blasimme A. Transparency about governance contributesto biobanks’ trustworthiness: call for action. Biopreserv Biobank.2021;19(1):83-5. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2020.0057
Heeney C, Kerr SM. Balancing the local and the universal in maintainingethical access to a genomics biobank. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):80.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0240-7
Caenazzo L, Tozzo P, Borovecki A. Ethical governance in biobankslinked to electronic health records. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci.2015;19(21):4182-6 [cited September 6, 2024]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290045432_Ethical_governance_in_biobanks_linked_to_electronic_health_records
Kurihara C, Kerpel-Fronius S, Becker S, Chan A, Nagaty Y, Naseem S, etal. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical norm in pursuit of common global goals.Front Med. 2024;11:1360653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1360653
World Medical Association. WMA declaration of Taipei on ethicalconsiderations regarding health databases and biobanks. Secondary WMADeclaration of taipei on ethical considerations regarding health databasesand biobanks. France: WMA, 2016 [cited September 6, 2024]. Availablefrom: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-taipei-onethical-considerations-regarding-health-databases-and-biobanks/
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Internationalethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. 4thed. Geneva: CIOMS, 2016 [cited September 6, 2024]. Available from: https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Internationalguidelines on good governance practice for research institutions.Geneva: CIOMS, 2023 [cited September 6 2024]. Available from: https://cioms.ch/publications/product/international-guidelines-on-good-governance-practice-for-research-institutions/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECDguidelines on human biobanks and genetic research databases. Eur JHealth Law. 2010;17(2):191-204.
Moodley K, Singh S. “It’s all about trust”: reflections of researcherson the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in SouthAfrica. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2
Ángeles-Llerenas A, Thrasher JF, Domínguez-Esponda R, López-RidauraR, Macklin R. Operation of research ethics committees in Colombia,Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Mexico: Mesoamerican Project. Salud PublicaMex. 2022;64(1):66-75. https://doi.org/10.21149/12588
African Bioethics Consortium. Research Ethics Committee AssessmentToolkit (RECAT). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 2017 [cited September6, 2024]. Available from: https://bioethics.jhu.edu/recat/
Ángeles-Llerenas A. Questionnaire research ethics committee members.Mexico: figshare, 2021 [cited September 6 2024]. Available from:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14082848.v1
Wiertz S, Boldt J. Evaluating models of consent in changing health researchenvironments. Med Health Care Philos. 2022;25(2):269-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10074-3
Lazcano-Ponce EC, Oropeza-Abúndez C. Conversaciones de SaludPública. Mexico: INSP, 2023 [cited September 6, 2024]. Available from:https://spmediciones.mx/libro/conversaciones-de-salud-publica_150008/
Remes-Lenicov F, Fink NE. Ethical issues in the use of leftover samplesand associated personal data obtained from diagnostic laboratories. ClinChim Acta. 2023;548:117442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2023.117442
Tamuhla T, Tiffin N, Allie T. An e-consent framework for tiered informedconsent for human genomic research in the global south, implementedas a REDCap template. BMC Medical Ethics. 2022;23(1):119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00860-2
Budin-Ljøsne I, Teare HJA, Kaye J, Beck S, Bentzen HB, Caenazzo L, etal. Dynamic consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges ofmodern biomedical research. BMC Medical Ethics. 2017;18(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0162-9
Chalarca-Cañas D, Vargas-Tejada DA, Valencia-Ocampo OJ, Velásquez-Lopera MM. Biobanks: conservation of the humanity scientific heritage.Iatreia. 2022;35(3):310-20 [cited September 6, 2024]. Available from:http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/iat/v35n3/0121-0793-iat-35-03-310.pdf
El Congreso de Colombia. Ley 2287 de 2023 (enero 13). Por mediode la cual se crea el Sistema Nacional de Biobancos y se regula elfuncionamiento de los biobancos con fines de investigación biomédicabiotecnológica y epidemiológica y se dictan otras disposiciones. Colombia:Diario Oficial, 2023 [cited September 6 2024]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC220631/
Centro de Desarrollo Estratégico e Información en Salud y SeguridadSocial. Reglamento de investigación biomédica. Costa Rica: Universidad deCosta Rica, 2021 [cited September 13 2024]. Available from: https://vinv.ucr.ac.cr/sites/default/files/documentos/reglamento_investigacion_biomedica_de_la_ccss.pdf
Vega-Jiménez B. Biobancos en los servicios de anatomía patológicaen Costa Rica: un análisis bioético y biojurídico. Acta Med Costarric.2022;64(4):55-63. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v64i4.1245
Mora-Vega SM. CCSS avanza en estudio de viabilidad para conformarBiobancos Humanos. Costa Rica: El Mundo, 2023 [cited September 6,2024]. Available from: https://elmundo.cr/costa-rica/ccss-avanza-en-estudio-de-viabilidad-para-conformar-biobancos-humanos/
Canario JA. Comparative analysis of regulatory framework on biobankingto inform policymakers in Central America and the DominicanRepublic. Wellcome Open Res. 2021;6(95). https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16547.1
Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social. Normativa para laregulación de ensayos clínicos en humanos. Guatemala: Ministerio deSalud Pública y Asistencia Social, 2019 [cited September 6, 2024]. Availablefrom: https://medicamentos.mspas.gob.gt/phocadownload/Acuerdo%20Ministerial%2082-2019.pdf
Motta-Murguia L, Saruwatari-Zavala G. Mexican regulationof biobanks. J Law Med Ethics. 2016;44(1):58-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110516644199
Soto-Gómez L. Regulating Mexican biobanks for human biomedicalresearch: what can be learned from the european experience?Mex Law Rev. 2014;7(1):31-55 [cited September 6, 2024]. Availablefrom: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-05782014000200002
Comisión Nacional de Bioética. Guía nacional para la integración y elfuncionamiento de los Comités de Ética en Investigación. Mexico: Conbioética,2018 [cited September 6, 2024]. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/414149/Guia_CEI_2018.pdf
Secretaría de Gobernación. Ley general de protección de datos personalesen posesión de sujetos obligados. Mexico: Orden Jurídico, 2017[cited March 30 2025]. Available from: https://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Documentos/Federal/pdf/wo119547.pdf
Secretaría de Gobernación. Ley federal de protección de datospersonales en posesión de los particulares. Mexico: Orden Jurídico, 2010[cited March 30 2025]. Available from: http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Documentos/Federal/pdf/wo83178.pdf
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Biobanco del IMSS conformaacervo de muestras y datos biológicos con potencial de evaluar campañasde vacunación y coadyuvar al desarrollo científico. Mexico: IMSS, 2023[cited May 8 2024 ]. Available from: https://www.imss.gob.mx/prensa/archivo/202303/133
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán.Biobanco Mexicano de Enfermedades Metabólicas. Mexico: INCMNSZ,2020 [cited Jun 27 2024]. Available from: https://www.incmnsz.mx/opencms/contenido/investigacion/uiem/biobanco.html