medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Archivos de Medicina de Urgencia de México

ISSN 2594-3006 (Electronic)
ISSN 2007-1752 (Print)
Archivos de Medicina de Urgencia de México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med Urg Mex 2025; 17 (1)

In-situ simulation as a tool in medical training and improvement

Cerón-Apipilhuasco A, Alvarado-Mena I, Loria-Castellanos J
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/120935

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/120935
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/120935

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 50-53
PDF size: 177.56 Kb.


Key words:

in situ simulation, clinical simulation, medical education, interdisciplinary team.

ABSTRACT

In situ simulation is an educational tool that recreates clinical scenarios within a real care environment, allowing to train personnel, as well as to evaluate their technical and non-technical competencies within their own work area. The main difference between an in situ simulation and a traditional one is that the former uses the real equipment and resources of the institution and involves the interdisciplinary team, favoring a high level of realism, resulting in improved clinical performance.
Among the benefits is the improvement of teamwork, as well as the preparation for emergency situations or adverse effects, and at the institutional level it can be used to identify possible latent errors within the system, all this generating an increase in patient safety. The resources used range from simulators of different fidelities, standardized patients for the development of non-technical skills and the use of other technologies such as virtual reality, adapted to the situation and context of the institution where it is being carried out.
Another area of application for in situ simulation is competency assessment, using various tools (e.g., TEAM, NOTECHS, Ottawa GRS) and validated models (e.g., Kirkpatrick). It must be taken into account that in situ simulation presents challenges, which can vary between institutions, logistical, economic, availability of space and standardized protocols, which can lead to significant variability in the implementation of in situ simulation.


REFERENCES

  1. Juul J, Paltved C, Krogh K, Musaeus P. In situ simulation: Takingreported critical incidents and adverse events back to the clinic.

  2. Santomauro CM, Hill A, McCurdie T, McGlashan HL. Improvingthe Quality of Evaluation Data in Simulation-Based HealthcareImprovement Projects: A Practitioner’s Guide to Choosingand Using Published Measurement Tools. Simul Healthc 2020Oct;15(5):341–355.

  3. Gawronski O, Thekkan K, Genna C, Egman S, Sansone V, ErbaI, et al. Instruments to evaluate non-technical skills during highfidelity simulation: A systematic review. Frontiers of Medicine2022;9:1–13.

  4. Repo JP, Rosqvist E, Lauritsalo S, Paloneva J. Translatability andvalidation of non-technical skills scale for trauma (T-NOTECHS)for assessing simulated multi-professional trauma team resuscitations.BMC Medical Education 2019;19(1):40.

  5. Rider AC, Williams SR, Jones V, Rebagliati D, Schertzer K, GisondiMA, et al. Assessing Team Performance: A Mixed-MethodsAnalysis Using Interprofessional in situ Simulation. West J EmergMed 2024 Jul;25(4):557–564.

  6. Miranda FMd, Santos BVD, Kristman VL, Mininel VA. EmployingKirkpatrick’s framework to evaluate nurse training: an integrativereview. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2025 Feb 3;33:e4431–8345.7250.4431. eCollection 2025.

  7. Clausen AF, Sperling S, Jensen RD, Skaarup SH. In-situ simulation-based team training reduces incidence of negative events duringbronchoscopy. A prospective educational intervention cohortstudy. Respir Res 2025 Apr 10;26(1):133–w.

  8. Simulation Training 2023 -03-01.

  9. Monette DL, Hegg DD, Chyn A, Gordon JA, Takayesu JK. A Guidefor Medical Educators: How to Design and Implement In SituSimulation in an Academic Emergency Department to SupportInterprofessional Education. Cureus 2021 May 11;13(5):e14965.

  10. Baxendale B, Evans K, Cowley A, Bramley L, Miles G, Ross A,et al. GENESISS 1—Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulationproject: a scoping review and conceptual model. BMC MedicalEducation 2022;22(1):479.

  11. Fent G, Blythe J, Farooq O, Purva M. In situ simulation as a toolfor patient safety: a systematic review identifying how it is usedand its effectiveness. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2015 Nov9;1(3):103–110.

  12. Gómez-Pérez V, Escrivá Peiró D, Sancho-Cantus D, Casaña MohedoJ. In Situ Simulation: A Strategy to Restore Patient Safety inIntensive Care Units after the COVID-19 Pandemic? SystematicReview. Healthcare 2023 -01-14;11(2).

  13. Goldshtein D, Krensky C, Doshi S, Perelman VS. In situ simulationand its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review. BMJ SimulTechnol Enhanc Learn 2019 Dec 24;6(1):3–9.

  14. Martin A, Cross S, Attoe C. The Use of in situ Simulation in HealthcareEducation: Current Perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract 2020Nov 27;11:893–903.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Med Urg Mex. 2025;17