2026, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Cir Columna 2026; 4 (1)
Description of the characteristics of patients with Scheuermann’s disease undergoing posterior instrumented arthrodesis who develop proximal or distal junctional kyphosis
Galo TSF, Ramírez GDG, Canales NJA, Hurtado PA
Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 6-11
PDF size: 249.80 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Scheuermann’s disease is a structural hyperkyphosis that primarily affects adolescents.
Surgical treatment with posterior instrumented arthrodesis (PIA) achieves effective angular correction;
however, it may be associated with complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and
distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), which can compromise long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Objective: to describe the characteristics of patients with Scheuermann’s disease who underwent
posterior instrumented arthrodesis and subsequently developed PJK and/or DJK.
Material and methods: this was a retrospective, observational, and descriptive study of 25 patients aged 12 to
18 years with Scheuermann’s disease who underwent surgery between 2020 and 2023 at Shriners
Hospital for Children Mexico. Radiographic variables such as thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis,
pelvic incidence, sagittal translation, instrumented levels, and PJK and DJK angles were analyzed
in the immediate postoperative period and at one-year follow-up.
Results: the mean preoperative
kyphosis was 78.7o, corrected to 61.8o postoperatively. PJK was present in 64% of patients at hospital
discharge and in 68% at one year. DJK was evident in 56% immediately postoperatively and in 68%
at one year. Among patients with DJK, 64% were instrumented to the last lordotic vertebra. Most
cases of PJK and DJK occurred in patients with neutral sagittal balance.
Conclusions: complications
such as PJK and DJK are frequent after surgery. The choice of instrumentation levels and sagittal
balance may influence their development.
REFERENCES
Lowe TG. Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Neurosurg Clin NAm. 2007; 18: 305-315.
Ristolainen L, Kettunen JA, Kujala UM, Heinonen A,Schlenzka D. Progression of thoracic Scheuermann’skyphosis after skeletal maturity. Spine. 2012; 37:E1278-E1283.
Sorensen KH. Scheuermann’s juvenile kyphosis: clinicalappearances, radiography, aetiology, and prognosis.Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1964.
Wenger DR, Frick SL. Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine.1999; 24: 2630-2639.
Scheuermann H. Juvenile kyphosis. Acta Orthop Scand.1934; 5: 1-46.
McMaster MJ, O’Brien MF. Scheuermann kyphosis:long-term results of surgical treatment. Spine. 1991; 16:691-695.
Lowe TG, Line BG. Evidence based medicine: analysisof Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine. 2007; 32: S115-S119.
Tsirikos AI, Jain AK. Scheuermann’s kyphosis: currentcontroversies. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93: 857-864.
Smith JS, Kebaish KM. Management of complicationsfollowing deformity correction surgery in adolescentidiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36:2229-2236.
Zhan L, Lee C, Chang Y, et al. Complications of spinaldeformity surgery in adults: a retrospective analysis. JNeurosurg Spine. 2012; 17: 315-324.
Yoshida G, Nakajima H, Yamato Y, et al. Proximaljunctional kyphosis following thoracic spinal fusion forscoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23: 1-6.
Lee C, Kim Y, Chang H, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosisafter corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37: 630-635.
Kebaish KM, Fisher RP. Treatment of adult scoliosis.Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008; 19: 475-482.
Lee C, Lee Y, Moon S, et al. The impact of kyphosisand lordosis alignment on the development of proximaljunctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017; 42: E307-E314.
Kwon B, Lenke LG. Proximal junctional kyphosisfollowing spinal deformity surgery. Neurosurg Focus.2010; 29: E2.
Cho KJ, Kim JH, Kim KJ, et al. Risk factors for proximaljunctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformitysurgery. Spine J. 2015; 15: 844-853.
Shigematsu H, Fujita N, Takahashi H, et al. Proximaljunctional kyphosis following correction of adolescentidiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of two types ofsurgery. Eur Spine J. 2017; 26: 2975-2980.
Fujita N, Yagi M, Tsuji T, et al. Incidence and risk factorsfor distal junctional kyphosis following posterior spinalfusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (PhilaPa 1976). 2014; 39: E1414-E141.