medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía de Columna

ISSN 2992-7749 (Electronic)
ISSN 2992-7897 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de difusión científica de la Asociación Mexicana de Cirujanos de Columna A. C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Políticas
    • Políticas éticas
    • Políticas de acceso abierto
    • Políticas de revisión de manuscritos
    • Políticas editoriales generales
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Columna 2026; 4 (1)

Effectiveness of closed reduction using craniocervical traction for traumatic cervical facet dislocation in an academic center: a pilot study

Ortiz-Lozano ND, Estévez-García IO, Zarate-Kalfopulos B, García-Ramos C, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Reyes-Sánchez A
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/121954

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/121954
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/121954

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 19-25
PDF size: 592.10 Kb.


Key words:

cervical facet dislocation, closed reduction, craniocervical traction, traumatic spinal cord injury, subaxial cervical spine, ASIA impairment scale.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: acute traumatic spinal cord injury resulting from cervical facet dislocation represents a significant physical, emotional, and economic burden for patients, their families, and society. Objective: this pilot study evaluates the efficacy of closed reduction using craniocervical traction in patients with subaxial cervical facet dislocation. Material and methods: the study included consecutive patients treated between January 2023 and February 2025 with a diagnosis of traumatic cervical subaxial cervical facet dislocation who underwent closed craniocervical traction reduction at a university academic center. Results: seventeen patients were included, of whom only 11 underwent closed reduction. Successful reduction rate was 90.9% with no additional neurological complications. Traction was performed under local anesthesia, with monitoring in the intensive care unit, and success was achieved even in late presentation cases (3-14 days after the injury). The most common complication was neck pain in 3 (27.3%) patients. Conclusions: craniocervical traction is an effective early therapeutic option with no reports of additional complications or neurological impairment associated with the procedure.


REFERENCES

  1. Gelb DE, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Hurlbert RJ,Rozzelle CJ, et al. Initial closed reduction of cervicalspinal fracture-dislocation injuries. Neurosurgery. 2013; 72: 73-83. Available in: https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/fulltext/2013/03002/initial_closed_reduction_of_cervical_spinal.10.aspx

  2. Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter MRN, DruschelC, Curt A, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat RevDis Primers. 2017; 3: 17018. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.18

  3. Wilson JR, Vaccaro A, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, ShaffreyC, Dvorak M, et al. The impact of facet dislocationon clinical outcomes after cervical spinal cord injury:results of a multicenter north american prospectivecohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38: 97-103.Available in: https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/fulltext/2013/01150/the_impact_of_facet_dislocation_on_clinical.2.aspx

  4. Newton D, England M, Doll H, Gardner BP. The case forearly treatment of dislocations of the cervical spine withcord involvement sustained playing rugby. J Bone JointSurg Br. 2011; 93-B: 1646-1652. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B12.27048

  5. Lee JY, Nassr A, Eck JC, Vaccaro AR. Controversies inthe treatment of cervical spine dislocations. The SpineJournal. 2009; 9: 418-423. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005

  6. Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Witiw CD, Harrop JS, VaccaroAR, Aarabi B, et al. The influence of timing of surgicaldecompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooledanalysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20: 117-126. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474442220304063

  7. Farmer J, Vaccaro A, Albert TJ, Malone S, BalderstonRA, Cotler JM. Neurologic deterioration after cervicalspinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord. 1998; 11: 192-196. Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9657541

  8. Oae K, Kamei N, Sawano M, Yahata T, Morii H, AdachiN, et al. Immediate Closed Reduction Technique forCervical Spine Dislocations. Asian Spine J. 2023;17: 835-841. Available in: https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0409

  9. Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG. Global burdenof traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Lancet Neurol.2019; 18: 24-25. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30444-7

  10. Sousa A, Rodrigues C, Marques M, Amorim-BarbosaT, Rodrigues-Pinto R. Awake cranial traction andisolated anterior cervical discectomy and fusion inthe treatment of traumatic subaxial cervical facet jointdislocations: analysis of a cohort of 70 patients andpredictors of surgical failure. Int J Spine Surg. 2022;16: 256. Available in: https://www.ijssurgery.com/content/16/2/256.abstract

  11. Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, Tigges S, HoffmanJR, Mower WR. Distribution and patterns of blunttraumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med.2001; 38: 17-21. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2001.116150

  12. Cotler JM, Herbison GJ, Nasuti JF, Ditunno JFJr, AnH, Wolff BE. Closed reduction of traumatic cervicalspine dislocation using traction weights up to 140pounds. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18: 386-390.Available in: https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/fulltext/1993/03000/closed_reduction_of_traumatic_cervical_spine.15.aspx

  13. Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A,Cadotte DW, Harrop JS, et al. Early versus delayeddecompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury:results of the surgical timing in acute spinal cord injurystudy (STASCIS). PLoS One. 2012; 7: e32037. Availablein: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032037

  14. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Flanders AE, BalderstonRA, Northrup BE, Cotler JM. Magnetic ResonanceEvaluation of the Intervertebral Disc, SpinalLigaments, and Spinal Cord Before and AfterClosed Traction Reduction of Cervical SpineDislocations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24:1210-1217. Available in: https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/fulltext/1999/06150/magnetic_resonance_evaluation_of_the.7.aspx

  15. Kim SG, Park SJ, Wang HS, Ju C Il, Lee SM, Kim SW.Anterior approach following intraoperative reductionfor cervical facet fracture and dislocation. J KoreanNeurosurg Soc. 2019; 63: 202-209. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0139

  16. Darsaut TE, Ashforth R, Bhargava R, Broad R, EmeryD, Kortbeek F, et al. A pilot study of magnetic resonanceimaging-guided closed reduction of cervical spinefractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31: 2085-2090.Available in: https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/fulltext/2006/08150/a_pilot_study_of_magnetic_resonance_imaging_guided.12.aspx

  17. Lee AS, MacLean JC, Newton DA. Rapid traction forreduction of cervical spine dislocations. J Bone JointSurg Br. 1994; 76: 352-356. Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8175833

  18. Anissipour AK, Agel J, Baron M, Magnusson E,Bellabarba C, Bransford RJ. Traumatic cervicalunilateral and bilateral facet dislocations treated withanterior cervical discectomy and fusion has a low failurerate. Global Spine J. 2017; 7: 110-115. Available in:https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217694002

  19. Brodke DS, Anderson PA, Newell DW, Grady MS,Chapman JR. Comparison of anterior and posteriorapproaches in cervical spinal cord injuries. J SpinalDisord Tech. 2003; 16: 229-235. Available in: https://journals.lww.com/jspinaldisorders/fulltext/2003/06000/comparison_of_anterior_and_posterior_approaches_in.1.aspx




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Columna. 2026;4