medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Nefrología, Diálisis y Trasplante

ISSN 0326-3428 (Print)
Órgano de difusión científica de la Asociación Nefrológica de Buenos Aires
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl 2025; 45 (4)

The effect of video-supported teaching methods on attitudes towards post-death organ donation

Gökce IA, Aslan BA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 23
Page: 179-187
PDF size: 239.23 Kb.


Key words:

Cadaver, Death, Nursing, Organ transplantation, Video-assisted teaching method.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Donations made after brain death continue to be the most important source of organs for transplantation. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effect of video-supported teaching methods on the attitudes of final-year nursing students towards postmortem organ donation. Materials and Methods: This study is a pre-test, post-test controlled quasi-experimental research. The study was conducted with 60 volunteer nursing students during the 2024-2025 academic year. Data were collected using the Student Information Form and the Post-Mortem Organ Donation Attitude Scale (PODAS) and analyzed using t-tests and one-way ANOVA. Results: The study revealed a significant difference in the PODAS scores of students who expressed a willingness to donate organs after death before and after the training (t = 3.698, p ‹ 0.001). The paired samples t-test conducted to determine the effect of the training on students’ attitudes towards organ donation revealed a statistically significant difference between pre-training (X̄ = 3.97 ± 0.37) and post-training (X̄ = 4.11 ± 0.36) PODAS scores before and after the education (X̄ = 3.97 ± 0.37) and after the education (X̄ = 4.11 ± 0.36). Conclusion: The study found that the video-supported teaching method employed led to positive outcomes, particularly in reducing negative attitudes and increasing family approval and overall attitudes towards organ donation.


REFERENCES

  1. Chu ST, Chung PPW, Hui YL, Choi HC, Lam HW,Sin LL, et al. Knowledge and attitude regardingorgan donation among medical students in HongKong: a cross-sectional study. Postgrad Med J. 2023;99(1173):744–52. doi:10.1136/pmj-2022-141781.

  2. Gökkaya ÖÜD, Karaman M. Turkish validity andreliability study of the postmortem organ donationattitude scale. Vis J. 2023;14(39). doi:10.21076/vizyoner.1258235.

  3. Alwahaibi N, Al Wahaibi A, Al Abri M. Knowledgeand attitude about organ donation andtransplantation among Omani university students.Front Public Health. 2023;11:1115531.doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1115531.

  4. Qasim K, Carson J. Does post-traumatic growthfollow parental death in adulthood? An empiricalinvestigation. Omega (Westport). 2022;86(1):25–44. doi:10.1177/0030222820961956.

  5. Spiro M, Raptis DA, Lentine KL, et al. Reinforcingglobal oversight of organ transplantation: activityand outcome monitoring through the developmentof registries. Transplantation. 2025;109(1):73–80.

  6. World Health Organization. Seventy-seventhWorld Health Assembly – Daily update: 30 May2024 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 3]. Availablefrom: https://www.who.int/news/item/30-05-2024-seventy-seventh-world-health-assembly---daily-update--30-may-2024.

  7. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health. OrganTransplants, Solid Organ Transplants. Organ andTissue Information System [Internet]. [cited 2025Jun 2]. Available from: https://organkds.saglik.gov.tr/dss/PUBLIC/Transplant_Solid_Organ.aspx.

  8. IRODat. International Registry in Organ Donationand Transplantation. Preliminary numbers 2023[Internet].[cited 2025 Sep 20]. Available from:https://www.irodat.org/img/database/pdf/Irodat-April-2024.pdf.

  9. Ruggieri S, Boca S, Ingoglia S. Willingness todonate organs after death: development andvalidation of a multidimensional scale on organdonation. Eur J Health Psychol. 2023;30(2):51–64. doi:10.1027/2512-8442/a000118.

  10. Meester I, Guajardo MP, Ramos ACT, Solís-SotoJM, Rojas-Martinez A. Willingness toward postmortembody donation to science at a Mexicanuniversity: an exploratory survey. BMC MedEthics. 2023;24(1):101. doi:10.1186/s12910-023-00982-1.

  11. Wong SH, Chow AYM. A validation study of thePosthumous Organ Donation Reasoned ActionScale. Omega (Westport). 2020;81(3):475–92.doi:10.1177/0030222818782332.

  12. Pedreira-Robles G, Garcimartín P, Sevilla-GuerraS, et al. Nurse-led clinical activity in kidneytransplantation care in Spain: a cross-sectionalobservational study. J Ren Care. 2024;50(2):168–75. doi:10.1111/jorc. 12463.

  13. Öden TN, Korkmaz FD. Nurses› responsibilitiesin increasing organ transplantation rates fromdeceased donor: what can we do in the hospitalarea? Celal Bayar Univ Sağlık Bilim Enst Derg.2021;8(3):558–65. doi:10.34087/cbusbed.889801.

  14. Hernon O, McSharry E, Simpkin A, MacLaren I,Carr PJ. Effectiveness of structured self-evaluationof video-recorded performance on peripheralintravenous catheter insertion: a randomisedcontrol trial study protocol. Trials. 2023;24(1):182.doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07200-8.

  15. Kaya A, Durgun H. Empowering nursing students:how video-based teaching enhances urinarycatheterization skills—a randomized controlledstudy. Int Neurourol J. 2025;29(2):103–9.doi:10.5213/inj.2448450.225.

  16. Bas-Sarmiento P, Coronil-Espinosa S, Poza-Méndez M, Fernández-Gutiérrez M. Interventionprogramme to improve knowledge, attitudes, andbehaviour of nursing students towards organdonation and transplantation: a randomisedcontrolled trial. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;68:103596.doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103596.

  17. Andrei H. Development of a scale to measure theattitude toward posthumous organ donation fortransplantation in Romania. An Stiint UnivAlexandru Ioan Cuza Iasi Psihol. 2012;(2):23–40.Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269993218.

  18. Sayın YY, Dağcı M. Attitude, knowledge, anddonor card volunteering of nursing studentsregarding organ donation. Bezmialem Sci. 2022.doi:10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.6507.

  19. Ruta F, Ferrara P, Terzoni S, et al. The attitudetowards organ donation: differences betweenstudents of medicine and nursing. A preliminarystudy at Unizkm-Catholic University “Our Lady ofGood Counsel” of Tirana. Nurse Educ Today.

  20. 2022;109:105208. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105208.20. Alwesmi MB, Alharbi AI, Alsaiari AA, et al. Therole of knowledge on nursing students’ attitudestoward organ donation: a cross-sectional study.Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(24):3134.doi:10.3390/healthcare11243134.

  21. Skowronski G, Ramnani A, Walton-Sonda D, etal. A scoping review of the perceptions of death inthe context of organ donation and transplantation.BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22(1):167.

  22. Šink Ž, Tonin G, Umek N, Cvetko E. Attitudes ofSlovenian students towards whole-body donation,organ donation, and the use of donated bodies inmedical education. BMC Med Educ.2024;24(1):1535. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06569-7.

  23. Yang SY, Oh YH. Video-assisted versus traditionalproblem-based learning: a quasi-experimental studyamong pediatric nursing students. J Nurs Res.2023;31(3):e277. doi:10.1097/jnr.000000000000055.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. 2025;45