medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2026; 49 (2)

Minimum epidural bupivacaine concentration after intrathecal multimodal anesthesia in hysterectomies: clinical trial

De ARA, Aguilar-González CL, Moreno-Barrón ML
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/122901

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/122901
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/122901

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 70-76
PDF size: 491.92 Kb.


Key words:

low concentrations, epidural bupivacaine, multimodal anesthesia, hysterectomy, spinal-epidural technique.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: epidural bupivacaine at concentrations below 0.1% after multimodal intrathecal anesthesia (MIA) offers very good anesthetic efficacy and very good hemodynamic control due to its lower effects on the sympathetic nervous system. Objective: to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy and safety of low concentrations of epidural bupivacaine with the combined spinal-epidural technique in hysterectomies. Material and methods: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in women scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). The trial was divided into 4 groups: group SB2 (isobaric bupivacaine 0.025% 5 mg), group SB5 (isobaric bupivacaine 0.05% 10 mg), group SB7 (isobaric bupivacaine 0.075% 15 mg), and group SB1 (isobaric bupivacaine 0.1% 20 mg). The anesthetic efficacy of the epidural dose was assessed based on a) whether the intrathecal dose required supplementation, b) the 60-minute period until the compresses were removed from the abdominal cavity, c) the need for a rescue dose or a second subsequent dose, and d) the immediate postoperative period, as well as vital signs. Results: a total of 168 women were analyzed, in whom anesthetic effectiveness and hemodynamic control could be considered very good, with no significant statistical differences found between groups. Conclusion: epidural concentrations of less than 0.1% bupivacaine offer very good anesthetic effectiveness and hemodynamic control.


REFERENCES

  1. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Clinical anesthesiology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013. pp. 277-280.

  2. Marrón-Peño M, Mille LJE, González CO, Cisneros RFJ. Anestesia general vs anestesia neuroaxial en la operación cesárea: ¿cómo tomar la mejor desición? Rev Mex Anest. 2015;38:547-556.

  3. Pervais BS, Abdullah, Akram M, Hussain A, Apeel SC. Critical anaesthetic incidents causes and analysis. Pak Armed Med J. 2019;69:307-313.

  4. Rawal N, Hulmström B, Crowhurst JA, Van Zundert A. The combined spinal-epidural technique. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000;18:267-295.

  5. Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:654-673.

  6. Papadopoulos MS, Tolikas AC, Miliaras DE. Hysterectomy-current methods and alternatives for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:356740.

  7. Brandsborg B. Pain following hysterectomy: epidemiological and clinical aspects. Dan Med J. 2012;59(1):B4374.

  8. Guasch E, Brogly N, Gilsanz F. Combined spinal epidural for labour analgesia and caesarean section: indications and recommendations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33:284-290.

  9. Mori K, Mizuno J, Nagaoka T, Harashima T, Morita S. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in a parturient with myotonic dystrophy. Masui. 2010;59:1000-1003.

  10. Hong JM, Kim E, Kim HK, Lee DW, Baik JS, Lee JY. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for radical hysterectomy in a patient with Sjögren Syndrome with progressive interstitial lung disease. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1737.

  11. Patel NP, Armstrong SL, Fernando R, Columb MO, Bray JK, Sodhi V, et al. Combined spinal epidural vs epidural labour analgesia: does initial intrathecal analgesia reduce the subsequent minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural bupivacaine? Anaesthesia. 2012;67(6):584-593.

  12. Salgueiro C, Moreno M, Arthagnan C, Peleritti H, Rampel J. Bajas dosis de bupivacaína asociadas a fentanilo en anestesia espinal. Técnicas de Anestesia Neuroaxial. 2007;65(6):401-408.

  13. Bofill GP, Valenzuela LK, Carballea Y, et al. Anestesia subaracnoidea con dosis variables de bupivacaína con fentanilo en la resección transuretral de la próstata. Rev Med Electrón. 2017;39:495-506.

  14. De Alba-Valverde RA, Aguilar-González CL, Paque-Bautista C, González AP, Sosa-Bustamante GP. Eficacia y seguridad de la anestesia multimodal intratecal con fentanilo en cesáreas: ensayo clínico. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2023;46:93-97.

  15. De Alba-Valverde RA, Aguilar-González CL, Moreno-Barrón ML. Anestesia multimodal intratecal en cesáreas, cambios que mejoran su eficacia y seguridad: ensayo clínico. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2023;46:179-183.

  16. De Alba-Valverde RA, Aguilar-González CL, Moreno-Barrón ML. Eficacia anestésica de la buprenorfina en la anestesia multimodal intratecal en histerectomías abdominales: ensayo clínico. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2024;4:71-75.

  17. Liu L, Qian J, Shen B, Xiao F, Shen H. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine can decrease the 95% effective dose of bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a prospective, double-blind,randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e14666.

  18. Mugabure BB, González SS, Uría AA, Torán GL. Actualizaciones en el manejo clínico de los opioides espinales en el dolor agudo posoperatorio. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2012;19(2):72-94.




Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2026;49