medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-3178 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, A.C.

2026, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Bucal Maxilofac 2026; 22 (1)

Functional palatal closure in cleft palate: surgical and anatomical-functional determinants. Analysis of the available evidence

Castilla CH, Dolores GIA, Salgado CF

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 12-20
PDF size: 520.46 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: cleft palate is a congenital malformation associated with speech, swallowing, and middle ear ventilation disorders. Despite advances in palatoplasty, velopharyngeal insufficiency remains one of the main functional sequelae. In this context, functional palatal closure has gained relevance as a surgical objective beyond anatomical repair. Objective: to analyze the available evidence on surgical and anatomical-functional determinants associated with functional palatal closure in pediatric patients with non-syndromic cleft palate, with emphasis on timing of palatoplasty, surgical technique, and its velopharyngeal and auditory implications. Material and methods: a structured narrative review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, including publications from 2000 to 2024 on surgical timing, palatoplasty technique, velopharyngeal function, and auditory outcomes in pediatric patients with non-syndromic cleft palate. Results: fifteen studies were analyzed. Palatoplasty performed before nine months of age was associated with a lower incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency than surgery performed after the first year of life. Techniques involving active muscular reconstruction of the soft palate, particularly the Furlow technique, showed better functional outcomes than Bardach or von Langenbeck. Greater velar length was associated with improved velopharyngeal competence. Evidence regarding auditory outcomes was less consistent, although it suggests a possible benefit from adequate muscular reconstruction. Conclusions: functional palatal closure depends on the interaction between surgical timing, repair technique, and anatomicalfunctional restoration of the velar musculature.


REFERENCES

  1. Weissler EH, Paine KM, Ahmed MK, Taub PJ. Alveolar bonegrafting and cleft lip and palate: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138 (6): 1287-1295.

  2. Rossell-Perry P. Atlas of operative techniques in primary cleft lipand palate repair. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 400.

  3. Shetye PR. Facial growth of adults with unoperated clefts. ClinPlast Surg. 2004; 31 (2): 361-371.

  4. Kummer AW. Speech evaluation for patients with cleft palate. ClinPlast Surg. 2014; 41 (2): 241-251.

  5. Poff C, Horton J, Boerner R, Marston AP, Nguyen SA, White DR.Publishing trends in velopharyngeal insufficiency. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol. 2020; 129: 109761.

  6. Phalke N, Goldman JJ. Cleft palate. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island(FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.

  7. Prosak OL, Du J, Gao L, Patel KR, Zhao S, Braun S et al. Doespalatoplasty technique impact resolution of eustachian tubedysfunction? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025; 62 (2): 179-187.

  8. Widodo DW, Hisyam A, Alviandi W, Mansyur M. Comparison ofeustachian tube ventilation function between cleft palate andnormal patients using sonotubometry. JPRAS Open. 2021; 29:32-40.

  9. Cornefjord M, Arnebrant K, Guné H, Holst J, Klinto K, StiernmanM et al. A systematic review of differences in outcome betweenone and two stage palate repair in cleft lip and palate. J Plast SurgHand Surg. 2023; 58: 132-141.

  10. Mir MA, Manohar N, Chattopadhyay D, Mahakalkar SS. A novelmodification of Bardach’s two-flap palatoplasty for repair of adifficult cleft palate. Arch Plast Surg. 2021; 48 (1): 75-79. doi:10.5999/aps.2020.00416.

  11. Alter N, Stone A, Powell M, Gordon EJ, Anan B, Hamdan U et al.It’s time to define the global burden of velopharyngeal insufficiency.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2026; 63 (4): 945-948.

  12. Shaw W, Semb G, Lohmander A, Persson C, Willadsen E, Clayton-Smith J et al. Timing Of Primary Surgery for cleft palate (TOPS):protocol for a randomised trial of palate surgery at 6 months versus12 months of age. BMJ Open. 2019; 9 (7): e029780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029780.

  13. Reddy RR, Gosla-Reddy S, Chilakalapudi A, Kokali S, BronkhorstEM, Kummer AW et al. Effect of one-stage versus two-stagepalatoplasty on hypernasality and fistula formation in children withcomplete unilateral cleft lip and palate: a randomized controlledtrial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142 (1): 42e-50e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004486.

  14. Sullivan SR, Marrinan EM, LaBrie RA, Rogers GF, Mulliken JB.Palatoplasty outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with cleft palate: a29-year assessment of one surgeon’s experience. J Craniofac Surg.2009; 20 Suppl 1: 612-616. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318192801b.

  15. Becker M, Svensson H, Sarnas KV, Jacobsson S. Von Langenbeckor Wardill procedures for primary palatal repair in patients withisolated cleft palate--speech results. Scand J Plast Reconstr SurgHand Surg. 2000; 34 (1): 27-32. doi: 10.1080/02844310050160141.

  16. Plonkowski AT, Choi DG, Naidu P, Turk M, Yao CA, Magee WP 3rd.The rate of secondary speech surgery after cleft palate repair: asystematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025; 13 (2):e6465. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006465.

  17. Moreau A, Charpuis-Vandenbogaerde C, Neiva-Vaz C, SanquerE, Soupre V, Vazquez MP et al. Speech outcome after intravelarveloplasty. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 122 (2): 147-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.05.015.

  18. Pitkanen VV, Geneid A, Saarikko AM, Hakli S, Alaluusua SA.Diagnosing and managing velopharyngeal insufficiency in patientswith cleft palate after primary palatoplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36 (3): 1008-1016. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009822.

  19. Gong SW, Hung P, Obinero CG, Barrera J, Jiang ZY, Greives MRet al. Effect of palatoplasty technique on otologic outcomes inchildren with cleft palate. Am J Otolaryngol. 2025; 46 (3): 104610.doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104610.

  20. Pasick CM, Shay PL, Stransky CA, Solot CB, Cohen MA, JacksonOA. Long term speech outcomes following late cleft palate repairusing the modified Furlow technique. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2014; 78 (12): 2275-2280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.10.033.

  21. Téblick S, Ruymaekers M, Van de Casteele E, Nadjmi N. Effect ofcleft palate closure technique on speech and middle ear outcome:a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77 (2): 405.e1-405.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.09.027.

  22. Kummer AW. Cleft palate and craniofacial conditions: acomprehensive guide to clinical management. 4th ed. Burlington,MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2020.

  23. Perry JL. Anatomy and physiology of the velopharyngealmechanism. Semin Speech Lang. 2011; 32 (2): 83-92. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1277712.

  24. Álvarez-Carvajal DC, Inostroza-Allende F, Geldres-Meneses MB,Giugliano-Villarroel C. Speech outcomes and velopharyngealfunction in children undergoing submucous cleft palate repair.J Craniofac Surg. 2023; 34 (6): e597-e600. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009570.

  25. Smetona JT, Naran S, Ford M, Losee JE. What’s new in cleftpalate and velopharyngeal dysfunction management: An update.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 154 (2): 378e-390e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011312.

  26. Huang Z, Bo Z, Li J, Zheng Q, Shi B, Zeng N. Proposed clinicalmodel for predicting speech outcomes in patients undergoingFurlow palatoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency after primarypalatoplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2024; 52 (2): 234-239. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2023.12.007.

  27. Ha S, Koh KS, Moon H, Jung S, Oh TS. Clinical outcomes ofprimary palatal surgery in children with nonsyndromic cleft palatewith and without lip. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 185459. doi:10.1155/2015/185459.

  28. Shaffer AD, Ford MD, Losee JE, Goldstein J, Costello BJ,Grunwaldt LJ et al. The association between age at palatoplastyand speech and language outcomes in children with cleft palate: anobservational chart review study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020; 57(2): 148-160. doi: 10.1177/1055665619882566.

  29. Gamble C, Persson C, Willadsen E, Albery L, Soegaard AndersenH, Zattoni Antoneli M et al. Timing of primary surgery for cleftpalate. N Engl J Med. 2023; 389(9): 795-807. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2215162.

  30. Hofman L, Paes EC, Haverkamp SJ, Jenniskens K, Mink van derMolen AB. “Long term speech outcomes after using the Sommerladtechnique for primary palatoplasty: a retrospective study in theWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht”. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28 (8): 441. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05828-7.

  31. Michael P, Karnell. Instrumental assessment of velopharyngealclosure for speech. Semin Speech Lang. 2011; 32 (2): 168-178.doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1277719.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com