2026, Number 2
<< Back
Rev ADM 2026; 83 (2)
Comments on the article «Adhesive efficacy of the deproteinization technique in healthy and fluorotic enamel: in vitro study»
Pomacóndor-Hernández C
Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 122-123
PDF size: 253.92 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Abu Alhaija ESJ, Al-Wahadni AMS. Evaluation of shear bond strengthwith different enamel pre-treatments. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26 (2):179-184. doi: 10.1093/EJO/26.2.179.
Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etchprimer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119 (6): 621-624. doi:10.1067/MOD.2001.113269.
Nalcaci R, Temel B, Cokakoglu S, Turkkahraman H, Usumez S.Effects of laser etching on shear bond strengths of brackets bondedto fluorosed enamel. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017; 20 (5): 545-551. doi:10.4103/1119-3077.183245.
Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJet al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliabilityof neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14 (5): 365-376. doi:10.1038/NRN3475.
Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bondstrength results of the different test methods: A critical literaturereview. Dental Materials. 2010; 26 (2): e78-e93. doi: 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2009.12.002.
Chiu K, Grundy Q, Bero L. ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature:A methodological systematic review. PLoS Biol. 2017; 15 (9):e2002173. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.2002173.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van EndeA, Neves A et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests andclinical outcomes. Dental Materials. 2010; 26 (2): e100-e121. doi:10.1016/J.DENTAL.2009.11.148.
Van Meerbeek B, Frankenberger R. Editorial: the VALUE andremaining NEED of bond-strength testing. J Adhes Dent. 2020; 22(2): 123-124. doi: 10.3290/J.JAD.A44440.
Full text
10.35366/123082