Agudelo L, Delgado A, Cock J

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 42-51
PDF size: 2321.48 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement is indicated for advanced joint pathology refractory to conservative treatment. Its aim is to restore function, reduce pain, and improve quality of life. It requires comprehensive diagnosis with imaging support. Custom-made prostheses using CAD/CAM optimize anatomical adaptation and postoperative stability. In selected patients, it is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative. Objective: to describe the surgical management and clinical evolution of a patient with bilateral temporomandibular osteoarthritis secondary to Behçet's disease, treated by bilateral total replacement of the TMJ with customized alloplastic prostheses. Case report: the patient had a history of polyneuropathy and multiple previous joint surgeries, without clinical response. Three-dimensional virtual planning, surgical guide design, and fabrication of custom prostheses were performed. The procedure included arthrectomy, meniscectomy, bilateral condylectomy, and placement of a custom prosthesis via preauricular and submandibular approaches. Postoperative clinical and radiological follow-up was performed, including functional evaluation and follow-up computed tomography. The patient experienced a significant decrease in pain, a progressive increase in mouth opening, and restoration of mandibular function. A follow-up computed tomography scan showed proper and symmetrical positioning of the prosthetic components, stable fixation, and no early complications. Occlusal stability was maintained, and the patient showed satisfactory recovery with no signs of infection, loosening, or heterotopic bone formation during the first two months. Conclusions: total bilateral temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement with custom-made prostheses is an effective alternative for managing end-stage joint disease in patients with complex surgical histories. Detailed virtual planning and the use of cutting guides contribute to improved surgical precision and a reduced risk of complications. Clinical implications: in cases of advanced joint disease associated with previous surgeries and extensive fibrosis, the use of CAD/CAM technology and custom-made prostheses can optimize functional outcomes and promote early recovery.

REFERENCES

1. Morin P, Talvilahti J, Ulmner M, Alstergren P, Nordendahl E, Naimi-Akbar A. Effects of total temporomandibular joint replacement with alloplastic prosthesis - a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2025; 84: 258-265. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.43641.

2. Sidebottom AJ; UK TMJ replacement surgeons; British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Guidelines for the replacement of temporomandibular joints in the United Kingdom. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 46 (2): 146-147.

3. Mercuri LG. Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: rationale for the use of custom devices. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41 (9): 1033-1040.

4. Wolford LM. Temporomandibular joint devices: treatment factors and outcomes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997; 83 (1): 143-149.

5. De Meurechy N, Mommaerts MY. Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement systems: a systematic review of their history. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47 (6): 743-754.

6. Wolford LM, Mercuri LG, Schneiderman ED, Movahed R, Allen W. Twenty-year follow-up study of total temporomandibular joint reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73 (5): 952–960.

7. Bach E, Sigaux N, Fauvernier M, Cousin AS. Reasons for failure of total temporomandibular joint replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 51 (8): 1059-1068. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.12.012

8. Genovesi W, Comenale IC, Genovesi FW, Veloso FM. Biomechanical comparative analysis of temporomandibular joint, glenoid fossa and head of the condyle of conventional models prothesis with new PEEK design. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022; 12 (5): 529-541. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.06.006

9. Briceño F, Ayala R, Delgado K, Piñango S. Evaluation of temporomandibular joint total replacement with alloplastic prosthesis: observational study of 27 patients. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2013; 6 (3): 171-178. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1343779

10. Sahdev R, Wu BW, Anderson N, Khawaja SN, Kim S, Keith DA. A retrospective study of patient outcomes after temporomandibular joint replacement with alloplastic total joint prosthesis at Massachusetts General Hospital. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77 (2): 280-288. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.09.002

11. Ravelo V, Vargas E, García GH, Sacco R, Navarro P, Olate S. TMJ replacement in degenerative disease: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2025; 14 (2): 580. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14020580

12. Park JH, Jo E, Cho H, Kim HJ. Temporomandibular joint reconstruction with alloplastic prosthesis: the outcomes of four cases. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 39 (1): 6. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-017-0103-7

13. Mercuri LG. Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement-what does the future hold? Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2020; 2: 20-20. Available in: https://doi.org/10.21037/fomm-2020-tjddm-02

14. Del Castillo Pardo de Vera JL, Cebrián Carretero JL, Aragón Niño Í, Pampín Martínez MM, Borjas Gómez JT, Navarro Cuéllar I, et al. Virtual surgical planning for temporomandibular joint reconstruction with stock TMJ prostheses: pilot study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60 (2): 339. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020339

15. Liu H, Huang L, Liu S, Liu L, Li B, Zheng Z, et al. Evolution of temporomandibular joint reconstruction: from autologous tissue transplantation to alloplastic joint replacement. Int J Oral Sci. 2025; 17: 17. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-024-00339-3

16. Almeida LE, Zammuto S, Mercuri LG. Quality of life outcomes following total temporomandibular joint replacement: a systematic review of long-term efficacy, functional improvements, and complication rates across prosthesis types. J Clin Med. 2025; 14: 4859. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144859.19

17. Rauniyar D, Upadhyaya C, Chaurasia N, Shakya M, Sharma S. Total temporomandibular joint replacement in recurrent temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a case report. J Surg Case Rep. 2023; 2023 (7): rjad426. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjad426

18. Elledge ROC, Speculand B. Indications for replacement after alloplastic temporomandibular joint device failure: a narrative review. Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2023; 5: 33-33. Available in: https://doi.org/10.21037/fomm-22-6

19. Gerber S, Woliansky M, Neiva-Sousa M, Visholm T, Limacher A, Sidebottom A. Complications of temporomandibular joint replacement surgery in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2025; 53: 1088-1100. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.03.016

20. Moreira CVA, Serra AVP, Silva LOR, Fernandes ACF, de Azevedo RA. Total bilateral TMJ reconstruction for pain and dysfunction: case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018; 42: 138-144. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.11.063

21. Malakuti I, Thor A. Bilateral TMJ ankylosis: total joint reconstruction in a patient with zero mouth opening: a case report. Craniomaxillofacial Research & Innovation. 2023; 8. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1177/27528464231163667

22. Vargas E, Ravelo V, Rana M, Unibazo A, Olate S. Long-term stability in temporomandibular joint replacement: a review of related variables. Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12 (11): 372. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12110372