medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Ángeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Ángeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Manuscript submission
    • Policies
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2026; 24 (3)

Evaluation of a hybrid teaching method (PIADE = Presentation, Artificial Intelligence, Guided Discussion, Exams) using artificial intelligence and traditional techniques

Orozco GA, Álvarez LMJ, Osorio MMF, Calderón JCL, Rodríguez ADA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 247-250
PDF size: 496.85 Kb.


Key words:

artificial intelligence, medical education, academic assessment, open-book exams.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: artificial intelligence (AI) has been progressively integrated into medical education as a useful tool to support learning. Objective: to evaluate the impact of using AI in the teaching of undergraduate medical interns, analyzing both their acceptance of its use, overall performance, and the results of closed-book midterm and final exams. Material and methods: an observational and analytical study was conducted during a two-month pediatrics course with 34 undergraduate medical interns. The teaching strategy combined presentations delivered without AI, AI-assisted presentations, daily group assessments, guided discussions using open-book exams, and individual closed-book exams. Results: class attendance was 95%. The average final grade was 92.8 ± 8.6 [range 67.1-99.4]. Analysis of the midterm and final exams alone showed an average of 82.6 ± 14.4 [range 45.25-97.75, median 87.5]. More than 75% of the students obtained grades above 80. Conclusions: the structured integration of AI into medical education is well-accepted, promotes active participation, facilitates collaborative learning, and is associated with high academic performance.


REFERENCES

  1. Wu J, Tlili A, Salha S et al. Unlocking the potential of artificialintelligence in improving learning achievement in blended learning:a meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2025; 16: 1691414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1691414.

  2. Li J, Yin K, Wang Y, Jiang X, Chen D. Effectiveness of generative artificialintelligence-based teaching versus traditional teaching methods inmedical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25 (1): 1175. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07750-2.

  3. Zhai Y, Nezakatgoo B. Evaluating AI-powered applications forenhancing undergraduate students’ metacognitive strategies, selfdeterminedmotivation, and social learning in English languageeducation. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15 (1): 35199. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-19118-z.

  4. Wei L. Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on englishlearning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. FrontPsychol. 2023; 14: 1261955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023. 1261955.

  5. Ekizer FN. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on Englishlanguage teaching: a meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica. 2025; 260:105649. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105649.

  6. Rahim M, Abraham J. Integrating AI into problem-based learning:implications andframeworks. Med Teach. 2022; 44 (9): 1010-1017.

  7. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A et al. Performance of ChatGPTon USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using largelanguage models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023; 2 (2): e0000198.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2026;24