2026, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2026; 40 (3)
Meta-analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, with and without anterolateral reinforcement: clinical and functional outcomes stratified by age and sport level
Morales-Valdes J, Sáenz-González M
Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 141-155
PDF size: 981.89 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: although anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) typically restores anteroposterior stability, residual rotational laxity—often manifesting as a positive pivot-shift test—may persist in some patients. To address this, anterolateral augmentation procedures, such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction, have regained interest for enhancing rotational control and graft protection.
Material and methods: we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA guidelines) of 31 Level I–II comparative studies (randomized trials and cohort studies) involving a total of 3,172 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Studies compared isolated ACLR versus ACLR with anterolateral reinforcement. Pooled outcomes included objective stability measures (pivot shift, Lachman test, instrumented laxity), patient-reported functional scores (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner), and graft re-rupture rates.
Results: the addition of anterolateral reinforcement significantly reduced the risk of residual pivot shift (RR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.37-0.55; p < 0.001), indicating a 55% lower likelihood of postoperative rotational instability. Graft re-rupture rates were also lower in the augmented group (3.8 vs 11.3%; RR = 0.33; 95%CI: 0.24-0.48). Functional outcomes were slightly better with combined procedures: pooled IKDC scores were 2.96 points higher (95%CI: 0.47-5.45), Lysholm scores increased by 2.43 points (not statistically significant), and Tegner scores were 0.47 points higher (95%CI: 0.06-0.88).
Conclusions: this meta-analysis indicates that supplementing ACL reconstruction with an anterolateral procedure provides superior rotational stability and lowers graft failure rates, without compromising short-term patient-reported outcomes. These findings support the consideration of combined approaches in patients at elevated risk of persistent rotational instability—particularly pivoting athletes.
REFERENCES
Joseph L, Demey G, Chamu T, Schmidt A, Germain A, van Rooij F, et al. Adding a modified Lemaire procedure to ACLR in knees with severe rotational knee instability does not compromise isokinetic muscle recovery at the time of return-to-play. J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7(1): 84. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00302-1.
Migliorini F, Lucenti L, Mok YR, Bardazzi T, D'Ambrosi R, De Carli A, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using lateral extra-articular procedures: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2): 294.
Gonnachon A, Labattut L, Abdoul Carime N, Orta C, Baulot E, Martz P. Does combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction improve return to sport? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(2): 981-7.
Mercurio M, Cofano E, Gasparini G, Galasso O, Familiari F, Sanzo V, et al. Isolated ACL reconstruction versus combined ACL and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: functional outcomes, return to sport, and survivorship: an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies. Am J Sports Med. 2025; 53(4): 971-80.
Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB Jr. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29(3): 272-9.
Lording TD, Lustig S, Servien E, Neyret P. Lateral reinforcement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2014; 1(1): 3-10.
Zaffagnini S, Grassi A, Lucidi GA, Dal Fabbro G, Ambrosini L. Combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis: the "over-the-top" technique. Video J Sports Med. 2023; 3(5): 26350254231177378.
Vadalá AP, Iorio R, De Carli A, Bonifazi A, Iorio C, Gatti A, et al. An extra-articular procedure improves the clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings in female athletes. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(2): 187-92.
Trichine F, Alsaati M, Chouteau J, Moyen B, Bouzitouna M, Maza R. Patellar tendon autograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without lateral plasty in advanced-stage chronic laxity. A clinical, prospective, randomized, single-blind study using passive dynamic X-rays. Knee. 2014; 21(1): 58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.06.001.
Yan F, Zhou P, Wen S, et al. The influence of arthroscopic double-bundle anatomical reconstruction surgery on knee joint stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee joint. Shanghai Med Pharm J. 2023; 44: 39-43.
Ferretti A, Monaco E, Ponzo A, Basiglini L, Iorio R, Caperna L, et al. Combined intra-articular and extra-articular reconstruction in anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knee: 25 years later. Arthroscopy. 2016; 32(10): 2104-11.
Ibrahim SA, Shohdy EM, Marwan Y, Ramadan SA, Almisfer AK, Mohammad MW, et al. Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee with or without reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(7): 1558-66.
Meynard P, Pelet H, Angelliaume A, Legallois Y, Lavignac P, De Bartolo R, et al. ACL reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis using a continuous graft: 10-year outcomes of 50 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106(5): 929-35.
Helito CP, Camargo DB, Sobrado MF, Bonadio MB, Giglio PN, Pécora JR, et al. Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in chronic ACL injuries leads to better clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(12): 3652-9.
Helito CP, Sobrado MF, Giglio PN, Bonadio MB, Pécora JR, Camanho GL, Demange MK. Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury and ligamentous hyperlaxity leads to better clinical stability and a lower failure rate than isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2019; 35(9): 2648-54.
Abdelrazek BH, Gad AM, Abdel-Aziz A. Rotational stability after ACL reconstruction using anatomic double bundle technique versus anatomic single bundle technique plus anterolateral ligament augmentation. J Arthrosc Jt Surg. 2019; 6(2): 108-13.
Goncharov EN, Koval OA, Dubrov VE, Bezuglov EN, Filimonova AM, Goncharov NG. Clinical experience with combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments of the knee in sportsmen. Int Orthop. 2019; 43 (12): 2781-2788. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04409-8.
Lee DW, Kim JG, Cho SI, Kim DH. Clinical outcomes of isolated revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or in combination with anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47(2): 324-33.
Getgood AMJ, Bryant DM, Litchfield R, Heard M, McCormack RG, Rezansoff A, et al. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces failure of hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: two-year outcomes from the STABILITY study randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(2): 285-97.
Castoldi M, Magnussen RA, Gunst S, Batailler C, Neyret P, Lustig S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without lateral extra-articular tenodesis: 19-year clinical and radiological follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(7): 1665-72.
Porter M, Shadbolt B. Modified iliotibial band tenodesis versus lateral extracapsular tenodesis, to augment anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a two-year randomized controlled trial. ANZ J Surg. 2022; 92(9): 2247-53.
Yoon KH, Hwang IU, Kim EJ, Kwon YB, Kim SG. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction improves anteroposterior stability as well as rotational stability in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with high-grade pivot shift. J Knee Surg. 2021; 34(12): 1310-7.
Hopper GP, Aithie JMS, Jenkins JM, Wilson WT, Mackay GM. Combined anterior cruciate ligament repair and anterolateral ligament internal brace augmentation: minimum 2-year patient-reported outcome measures. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8(12): 2325967120968557.
Ni QK, Chen W, Lv JT, Wang YJ, Mu MD, Zhang H, et al. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis notably reduced residual knee instability and anterior tibial translation in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury combined with a high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(4): 23259671251323905.
Toker MB, Erden T, Toprak A, Taser OF. Does anterolateral ligament internal bracing improve the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized joint hypermobility? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022; 28(3): 320-7.
Arora M, Tapasvi S, Shah J. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using peroneus longus with lateral extra-articular tenodesis has excellent functional outcomes with a high return to sport rate: a prospective cohort study of 482 patients over two years. Knee. 2026; 60: 104404.
Laboudie P, Douiri A, Bouguennec N, Biset A, Graveleau N. Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction reduces the rate of reoperation for graft failure or secondary meniscal lesions in young athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(10): 3488-98.
Devitt BM, Bouguennec N, Barfod KW, Porter T, Webster KE, Feller JA. Combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis does not result in an increased rate of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(4): 1149-60.
Heard M, Marmura H, Bryant D, Litchfield R, McCormack R, MacDonald P, et al. No increase in adverse events with lateral extra-articular tenodesis augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - Results from the stability randomized trial. J ISAKOS. 2023; 8(4): 246-54.
Lee JH, Lee GB, Chung W, Han SB, Jang KM. Addition of anterolateral ligament reconstruction to primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction could benefit recovery of functional outcomes. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1): 11440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62444-x.
EVIDENCE LEVEL
II (metaanálisis de estudios clínicos)