Guzmán VZSY, Vergara GJ, Torres ACG, Ramos AA

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 7-11
PDF size: 955.79 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: people who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction often experience functional limitations that hinder their return to work. This study evaluated the ability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Questionnaire (WHODAS 2.0) to predict return to work in adults of working age. Material and methods: this was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study with prospective data collection in 70 military patients and their dependents ≥ 3 months post-MI (approximate range: 3 months to 1-2 years) who had completed Phase II of cardiac rehabilitation and were in Phase III (outpatient follow-up). Disability was assessed using the 36-item WHODAS 2.0, self-administered (printed format and Google Forms) and interviewed, with a total score of 0-100 and disability classification as follows: 0-24 normal function, 25-49 mild, 50-74 moderate, and ≥ 75 severe. Return to work was operationally defined as yes/no; additionally, the time to return and adaptations made were collected descriptively. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. The main hypothesis (degree of disability vs. labor reintegration) was evaluated with Pearson’s χ2, and multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for covariates, considering p < 0.05 as statistical significance. Results: the total disability score was higher in those who did not reintegrate, with a significant difference (Student’s t-test, p = 0.01). Questions in the cognition domain were associated with non-reintegration (p < 0.05). In the logistic regression, the cognition, activities of daily living, and participation in society domains were significant predictors of reintegration status. Conclusions: there is a significant association between greater disability and a lower probability of reintegration into the workforce. Functional assessment using the World Health Organization questionnaire, version 2.0, provides value in stratifying risk and guiding rehabilitation interventions aimed at a safe and sustainable return to work.

REFERENCES

1. Dattoli-García CA, Jackson-Pedroza CN, Gallardo-GrajedaAL, Gopar-Nieto R, Araiza-Garygordobil D, Arias-Mendoza A.Acute myocardial infarction: Review on risk factors, etiologies,angiographic characteristics and outcomes in young patients.Arch Cardiol Mex. 2021; 91 (4): 485-492. doi: 10.24875/ACM.20000386.

2. Gómez FCX, Díaz EA, Lara ML, Maldonado AJ, Rangel PV,Vázquez OLM. Infarto agudo de miocardio como causa demuerte. Rev Fac Med (Méx). 2021; 64 (1): 49-59. doi: 10.22201/fm.24484865e.2021.64.1.08.

3. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Medición de la salud y ladiscapacidad: manual para el Cuestionario de Evaluación de laDiscapacidad de la OMS (WHODAS 2.0). Ginebra: OrganizaciónMundial de la Salud; 2010.

4. Brown TM, Pack QR, Aberegg E et al. Core components of cardiacrehabilitation programs: 2024 update: a scientific statement fromthe American Heart Association and the American Association ofCardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2024;150 (18): e328-e347. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001289.

5. Sellén-Sanchén E, Gil-García V, Pedroso-Almarales N, Rodríguez-López Y, Sellén-Crombet J. Rehabilitación cardiaca en mujeres yhombres después de un infarto agudo del miocardio. Rev Finlay.2023; 13 (1): 67-75. Disponible en: https://revfinlay.sld.cu/index.php/finlay/article/view/1165/2098

6. Qiao S, Chen X, Cao X. Factors associated with return to work afteracute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Work. 2024; 79 (3): 1011-1025. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230301.

7. O’Hagan FT, Coutu MF, Thomas SG, Mertens DJ. Work reintegrationand cardiovascular disease: medical and rehabilitation influences.J Occup Rehabil. 2012; 22 (2): 270-281. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9345-x.

8. Álvarez-Bandrés N, Malillos-Torán M, Domínguez-Aragó A et al.Reinserción laboral tras infarto agudo de miocardio. Rehabilitación.2008; 42 (5): 224-230. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7120(08)74596-1.

9. Rodríguez FE. Formación para el trabajo en personas con condiciónde discapacidad. Rev Colomb Rehabil. 2018; 3 (1): 31-38. doi: 10.30788/RevColReh.v3.n1.2004.258.

10. Stendardo M, Bonci M, Casillo V et al. Predicting return to work afteracute myocardial infarction: socio-occupational factors overcomeclinical conditions. PLoS One. 2018; 13 (12): e0208842. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208842.

11. Huang SW, Chang KH, Escorpizo R, Liou TH. Accuracy of a modifiedWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 asan assessment tool for predicting return-to-work among patientswith traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 42 (23): 3370-3376. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1594401.

12. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons withDisabilities [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2006 Dec 13[cited 2026 Jan 5]. Available in: https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/a_res_61_106-e.pdf

13. Ramírez-Rentería G. De la deficiencia a la diversidad: análisis críticodel marco jurídico mexicano y los nuevos paradigmas del concepto dediscapacidad. Cuest Const. 2025; 26 (52): e18692. doi: 10.22201/iij.24484881e.2025.52.18692. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1405-91932025000100109&script=sci_arttext

14. Sun W, Gholizadeh L, Perry L, Kang K. Predicting return to workfollowing myocardial infarction: a prospective longitudinal cohortstudy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19 (13): 8032. doi:10.3390/ijerph19138032.