medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Crítica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • Policies
  • Lineamientos
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2026; 40 (2)

Disconnection from ECMO in palliative care: avoiding a «bridge to suffering»

Villagrana MSA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/123476

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123476
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123476

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 136-141
PDF size: 581.62 Kb.


Key words:

ECMO, palliative care, bioethics, futility, terminal illness.

ABSTRACT

The use of technology to treat critically ill patients has increased in recent years. One such example is extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), which has been shown to reduce mortality in these patients. However, difficulties and ethical dilemmas have arisen, especially when the illness progresses to terminal stages or when continuing ECMO seems futile due to complications inherent to the critically ill patient. The integration of a palliative care team focused on comprehensively validating emotions, treating symptoms, improving comfort, and managing communication appears to be very helpful; unfortunately, their involvement often comes late. The process of withdrawing life support is often distressing not only for family members but also for the clinical team, leading to doubts about their work and causing emotional distress. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to acknowledge this possibility from the outset of a case, as well as to integrate palliative care into the treatment team and consider consultations with the hospital’s bioethics committee. This review will address this difficult situation from the perspective of both the medical team and the family. Important concepts will be clarified, and recommendations will be made based on various guidelines that address this topic.


REFERENCES

  1. Latifi-Pour M, Moradi A, Mahmoudi H, Amouzegar ZavarehSA, Amouzegar Zavareh SM. Determining the end of life inextracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: conceptanalysis. Int J Travel Med Glob Health. 2023;11(1):243.

  2. Fernández-Mondéjar E, Fuset-Cabanes MP, Grau-CarmonaT, López-Sánchez M, Peñuelas O, Pérez-Vela JL, et al.Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Critical CareMedicine and Coronary Units. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed).2019;43(2):108-120.

  3. Piscitello GM, Siegler M, Parker WF. Ethics of extracorporealmembrane oxygenation under conventional and crisis standardsof care. J Clin Ethics. 2022;33(1):13-22.

  4. Jaramillo C, Braus N. How should ECMO initiation and withdrawaldecisions be shared? AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(5):E387-E393.

  5. Peeler A, Davidson PM, Gleason KT, Stephens RS, Ferrell B,Kim BS, et al. Palliative care utilization in patients requiringextracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an observational study.ASAIO J. 2023;69(11):1009-1015.

  6. Patarroyo-Aponte G, Shoar S, Ashley DM, Noorbaksh A, PatelD, Young AY, et al. The role of palliative care consultation inwithdrawal of life-sustaining treatment among ICU patientsreceiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(VV-ECMO): a retrospective case-control study. Am J HospPalliat Care. 2024;41(2):150-157.

  7. Mulaikal TA, Nakagawa S, Prager KM. Extracorporeal membraneoxygenation bridge to no recovery. Circulation. 2019;139(4):428-430.

  8. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, Lo B, Truog RD, RushtonCH, et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policystatement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriatetreatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.2015;191(11):1318-1330.

  9. Kesecioglu J, Rusinova K, Alampi D, Arabi YM, Benbenishty J,Benoit D, et al. European Society of Intensive Care Medicineguidelines on end of life and palliative care in the intensive careunit. Intensive Care Med. 2024;50(11):1740-1766.

  10. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, Haas CE, Luce JM,Rubenfeld GD, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care inthe intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the AmericanCollege [corrected] of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med.2008;36(3):953-963.

  11. Downar J, Delaney JW, Hawryluck L, Kenny L. Guidelines forthe withdrawal of life-sustaining measures. Intensive Care Med.2016;42(6):1003-1017.

  12. Gries CJ, Curtis JR, Wall RJ, Engelberg RA. Family membersatisfaction with end-of-life decision making in the ICU. Chest.2008;133(3):704-712.

  13. Bein T, Brodie D. Understanding ethical decisions forpatients on extracorporeal life support. Intensive Care Med.2017;43(10):1510-1511.

  14. Rutz Voumard R, Ltaief Z, Liaudet L, Jox RJ. ECMO as apalliative bridge to death. Am J Bioeth. 2023;23(6):35-38.

  15. Rao A, Zaaqoq AM, Kang IG, Vaughan EM, Flores J, Avila-Quintero VJ, et al. Palliative care for patients on extracorporealmembrane oxygenation for COVID-19 infection. Am J HospPalliat Care. 2021;38(7):854-860.

  16. Constantine L, DeCicco D, Carpenter RD, Pockl S, SeachristKB, Navia RO. Healthcare providers’ experiences of caring forpatients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membraneoxygenation support. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024;41(5):568-573.

  17. DeMartino ES, Braus NA, Sulmasy DP, Bohman JK, StulakJM, Guru PK, et al. Decisions to withdraw extracorporealmembrane oxygenation support: patient characteristics andethical considerations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(4):620-627. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.020.

  18. Makdisi T, Makdisi G. Ethical challenges in extra corporealmembrane oxygenation use. Ann Palliat Med. 2017;6(Suppl2):S128-S131. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.03.11.

  19. Nerness R, Levin C, Hubel K. Extracorporeal membraneoxygenation discontinuation in the dying patient #472. J PalliatMed. 2024;27(2):265-266. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0606.

  20. Meltzer EC, Ivascu NS, Edwin MK, Ingall TJ. Should long-termlife-sustaining care be started in emergency settings? AMA JEthics. 2019;21(5):E401-406. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.401.

  21. Childress A, Bibler T, Moore B, Nelson RH, Robertson-PreidlerJ, Schuman O, et al. From bridge to destination? Ethicalconsiderations related to withdrawal of ECMO support over theobjections of capacitated patients. Am J Bioeth. 2023;23(6):5-17.doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2075959.

  22. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Medical-Surgical IntensiveCare Unit, Children’s Hospital Boston. Guidelines for carefollowing the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustainingtreatments. Boston: Children’s Hospital Boston; 2008.

  23. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. LeyGeneral de Salud. Nueva Ley publicada en el Diario Oficialde la Federación el 7 de febrero de 1984. México: Cámara deDiputados; 1984. Disponible en: https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGS.pdf

  24. Yang X, Lin Y, Tang A, Zeng X, Dai W, Zhang Q, et al. Toughchoices: the experience of family members of critically ill patientsparticipating in ECMO treatment decision-making: a descriptivequalitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025;25(1):65.doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02876-1.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Crit. 2026;40