medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Cardiaca en México

ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Card Mex 2026; 11 (3)

Apical approach with double-lumen cannula for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to ventricular assist device. Alea Iacta est

Orozco-Hernández, Erik J1; Cozette Killian, A1; Restrepo-Cárdenas, Juan2; Wong, Ryan1; Tallaj, José3; Tyndal Jr, Charles M1; McILwain, R Britt1; Hoopes, Charles W1
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/123483

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123483
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123483

Language: English
References: 18
Page: 98-103
PDF size: 2276.97 Kb.


Key words:

cardiogenic shock, dual lumen cannula, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, heart failure.

ABSTRACT

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is used in the treatment of cardiogenic shock. options for temporary MCS typically include intra-aortic balloon pump placement (IABP), impella, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Cannulation for VA-ECMO can be done either peripherally, or centrally. Central cannulation allows for antegrade arterial return and can be used when adequate flow cannot be achieved via peripheral cannulation, but it must be performed surgically. However, minimally-invasive techniques, such as transapical placement under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography, have been described using the dual lumen cannula ProtekDuo®. This approach may be associated with decreased hemolysis, improved mobility, and early extubation. This technique has been used as a bridge to LVAD, as well as bridge to recovery, IABPs and Impella® both require access via either axillary or femoral artery. Our case describes the successful minimally invasive placement and use of a Spectrum® cannula for central VA-ECMO in a patient who did not have adequate arterial access, as a bridge to LVAD, after which the patient achieved cardiac recovery.



ABBREVIATIONS:

  • CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass
  • IABP = intra-aortic balloon pump placement
  • LVAD = left ventricular assist device
  • MCS = mechanical circulatory support
  • TEE = transesophageal echocardiography
  • VA-ECMO = veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for cardiogenic shock has rapidly increased.1 Most common initial MCS strategies entail institution of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). For patients with anatomically small peripheral arteries or insufficient circulatory support, central cannulation techniques may be necessary. These invasive approaches are associated with increased risk of bleeding and other significant complications.2 To minimize complications, many different techniques have been described including a mini left thoracotomy and direct apical cannulation for VA-ECMO using a ProtekDuo Cannula (Cardiac Assist Inc., LivaNova). This technique allows early ambulation and avoids peripheral artery access complications but has only been described in small case series.3 However, to our knowledge, this is the first case describing the use of the Spectrum® cannula (Spectrum Medical) for apical central ECMO as bridge to left ventricular assist device (LVAD).



CASE DESCRIPTION

A 27-year-old female with a history of dilated cardiomyopathy, peripartum cardiomyopathy resulting in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, hypertension, and obesity with Body Mass Index (BMI) 40, presented with pneumonia and acute on chronic systolic heart failure. She experienced dyspnea, rapid labored breathing, and hypoxia. She was placed on nasal cannula. Chest X-ray showed bilateral infiltrates and pulmonary edema. The patient was intubated due to worsening respiratory distress and started on intravenous Lasix, milrinone, heparin infusion, propofol, and fentanyl. An arterial line connected to a FloTrac device recorded a cardiac output of 6.0 l/min, cardiac index of 3.3 l/min/m2 and central venous pressure of 12 mmHg. Fevers developed, vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam were initiated. The patient was transferred for further management.

Upon arrival, the patient was in cardiogenic shock and maintained on propofol and milrinone. Temperature was 38.4 °C, blood pressure 122/80 mmHg, with low ventilator settings and no acidosis and/or hypoxemia. Laboratory studies showed total bilirubin 7.4 mg/dl, direct bilirubin 4.3 mg/dl, ALT 74, LDH 356, BNP 135, troponin 67, WBC 14.4, PLT 134, D-dimer 2362, fibrinogen 575, and urinalysis negative for infection.

The patient initially declined transplant consideration due to negative family experience. Barriers included BMI. severity of illness with multi-organ dysfunction with possible pneumonia, and segmental/subsegmental pulmonary thromboembolism. In subsequent days, multiple vasopressors were required. Diminished lower extremity pulses bilaterally raised concern for acute limb ischemia. Echocardiography revealed marked stasis in the left ventricle "smoke" (Figure 1) and femoral and axillary vessels measuring less than 5 mm. Given the lack of suitable peripheral cannulation sites, including axillary Impella® (Abiomed, Johnson & Johnson. Massachusetts, United States America), and in order to avoid sternotomy, the decision was made to transition the patient to apical central ECMO.



SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The apex of the heart was identified. A small left anterior thoracotomy was performed. The pericardium was incised. A 14 mm Dacron Graft® (Maquet. New Jersey, United States America) was anastomosed with several mattress full thickness 4-0 Pledgeted Prolene® suture (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, New Jersey, United States America) at the apex. Heparin was administered, an 8 mm Dacron Graft® (Maquet, New Jersey, United States America) was anastomosed to the small right axillary artery, simultaneously, the right femoral vein was cannulated with Seldinger Technique with a 25 Fr long venous cannula Multihole® (Medtronic, Minneapolis, United States America) in preparation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Under transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance, the apical myocardium inside the graft was accessed with a needle. Using the Seldinger technique, a 0.035" Glidewire® (Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corp., Colorado, United States America) was placed into the left ventricle and passed antegrade through the aortic valve into the ascending aorta. A 5 Fr Berenstein exchange catheter® (Cordis, Florida, United States America) was placed and was exchanged for an 0.035" Lunderquist guidewire® (Cook Medical. Indiana, United States America). After serial dilations until the dilator 29 Fr, A 32F chest tube was placed inferior to the thoracotomy at the level of the anterior axillary line, making a muscular tunnel to allow passage of the Lunderquist Guidewire® (Cook Medical. Indiana, United States America). The chest tube was removed. A 31 Fr Spectrum® cannula (Spectrum Medical, South Carolina, United States America) was advanced over the guidewire (across the tunnel). Cannula positioning was guided by TEE, the two sets of inflow drainage orifices were visualized within left ventricle under TEE (Figure 2), The most proximal drainage orifice was located immediately above aortic valve (Figure 3) After adequate positioning of the inflow and outflow ports (aortic arch area) (Figure 4) was confirmed, MCS was initiated successfully. Adequate biventricular function on central ECMO via the Spectrum® cannula (Spectrum Medical, South Carolina, United States America) was verified on TEE and the CPB was weaned.

She was now in INTERMACS 1 on central VA Apical ECMO (Figure 5) (Figure 6). After eight days, LVAD Heartmate 3® (Abbot, Illinois, United States America) was implanted, complicated by right ventricular failure and acute kidney injury, she required two days later a Protekduo® (Cardiac Assist, LivaNova, London, United Kingdom) as "oxy-right ventricular assist device", and decannulated for improvement nine days later. For the acute kidney injury she was on hemodialysis, with renal recovery. She has been stable, without complications related to the LVAD, now as a bridge to decision, according with her evolution, bridge to transplant can be the next step.



COMMENT

This case report introduces a novel, minimally invasive surgical technique for central VA-ECMO, using the apical placement of a Spectrum cannula (Spectrum Medical) via a left thoracotomy. This approach successfully served as a bridge to a durable implantable LVAD in a patient for whom conventional temporary mechanical circulatory support devices, such as the Impella® platform or peripheral VA-ECMO, were not viable.

MCS is used in the treatment of cardiogenic shock in order to improve hemodynamics when initial therapy has failed to achieve adequate tissue perfusion.4 Cannulation for VA-ECMO can be done either peripherally, with venous drainage from the femoral or internal jugular vein and arterial return access through the femoral or axillary artery, or centrally, with direct cannulation of the aorta and the right atrium.5,6 Central cannulation allows for antegrade arterial return and can be used when adequate flow cannot be achieved via peripheral cannulation, but it must be performed surgically, and is usually done through median sternotomy.7 However, minimally invasive techniques, such as transapical placement under the guidance of TEE, have been described for central cannulation using devices such as the ProtekDuo® (Cardiac Assist, LivaNova, London, United Kingdom).8-10 Additionally, the use of transapical dual-lumen cannula may be associated with decreased hemolysis, improved mobility, and earlier freedom from mechanical ventilatory support.11 This technique has been used successfully as a bridge to durable implantable LVAD placement as well as a bridge to recovery.12,13 Other short-term mechanical circulatory support devices include IABPs, as well as intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist devices, such as Impella® platform devices.14,15 However, IABPs and Impella® both require access via either the axillary or the femoral artery. Our case describes the successful minimally invasive placement and use of a Spectrum® cannula (Spectrum Medical, South Carolina, United States America) for central VA-ECMO in a patient who did not have adequate access, as a bridge to LVAD, after which the patient achieved cardiac recovery.

Capelli published the largest case series to date documenting the safety and efficacy of transapical VA-ECMO cannulation with the ProtekDuo cannula® (Cardiac Assist, LivaNova, London, United Kingdom). Our surgical technique followed the same steps and principles.8 As the ProtekDuo cannula® (Cardiac Assist, LivaNova, London, United Kingdom), the Spectrum® cannula (Spectrum Medical, South Carolina, United States America) was designed for Right ventricular Support. However, it introduces an important modification, this cannula is designed with an additional set of orifices to ensure more complete and more effective right ventricular decompression. This is particularly relevant given that the ProtekDuo cannula® (Cardiac Assist, LivaNova, London, United Kingdom) is no longer available, making our technique a critical alternative for managing complex cases. Some multiples reports showed the use of the spectrum® cannula (Spectrum Medical, South Carolina, United States America) as Right Ventricular Support.16-18

However, the apical technique provides Left ventricular decompression with optional biventricular support and respiratory support. The successful application of this method allowed the patient to be supported for approximately one week, a timeframe that allowed for clinical stabilization and decision-making regarding destination therapy. This highlights the viability of this minimally invasive central VA-ECMO approach as a durable bridge to either recovery or long-term mechanical support. Furthermore, the technique avoids the risk of aortic insufficiency and intravascular hemolysis often associated with other support devices. By facilitating ambulation and early freedom from mechanical ventilation, it may also contribute to improved patient outcomes and quality of life. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported case of using a Spectrum® cannula (Spectrum Medical, South Carolina, United States America) for minimally invasive central VA-ECMO as a bridge to a durable mechanical circulatory support device. This technique should be considered in the therapeutic repertoire of temporary circulatory support strategies, especially in situations where other methods are not feasible due to unfavorable anatomy, inadequate flow, or significant hemolysis. In complex and seemingly intractable clinical scenarios. "Alea iacta est", this quote by Julius Caesar describes the moment when an irrevocable decision is made and a point of no return is crossed, implying that there is no turning back and one must face whatever comes next. However, this approach offers a viable and effective solution.



CONCLUSIONS

This novel central cannulation technique using an apical placement of a Spectrum cannula for VA-ECMO provides LV decompression with optional biventricular support and respiratory support to facilitate ambulation while avoiding many of the risks of traditional cannulation, this unique case was bridge to LVAD, however, bridge to decision, transplant or recovery are some potential therapeutic goals. It has been demonstrated that this technique with ProtekDuo cannula was used safely when there is not any other option for MCS. Further rigorous studies are warranted to continue documenting outcomes using this novel Spectrum cannula before its use can become widespread.


REFERENCES

  1. Shah M, Patnaik S, Patel B, et al. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(4):287-303.

  2. Takeda K, Garan AR, Ando M, et al. Minimally invasive CentriMag ventricular assist device support integrated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock patients: a comparison with conventional CentriMag biventricular support configuration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52(6):1055-1061.

  3. Rao P, Alouidor B, Smith R, Khalpey Z. Ambulatory central VA-ECMO with biventricular decompression for acute cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92(5):1002-1004.

  4. Nakata J, Yamamoto T, Saku K, Ikeda Y, Unoki T, Asai K. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. J Intensive Care. 2023;11(1):64. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00710-2

  5. Dangl M, Albosta M, Butros H, Loebe M. Temporary mechanical circulatory support: left, right, and biventricular devices. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(5):27-42. Available in: https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X19666230314115853

  6. Jayaraman AL, Cormican D, Shah P, Ramakrishna H. Cannulation strategies in adult veno-arterial and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Techniques, limitations, and special considerations. Ann Card Anaesth. 2017;20(Supplement):S11-S18. Available in: https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.197791

  7. Pavlushkov E, Berman M, Valchanov K. Cannulation techniques for extracorporeal life support. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(4):70. Available in: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.11.47

  8. Cappelli J, Emling J, Edwards A, Babu A. Direct apical cannulation with protek duo rapid deployment cannula via mini thoracotomy for ambulatory venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2024;70(7):565-569. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002157. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002157

  9. Ravipati HL, Nooli NP, Hoopes CW, et al. A novel method of transapical ProtekDuo rapid deployment cannula as temporary left ventricular assist device. J Surg Case Rep. 2023;2023(6):rjad246. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjad246

  10. Belani K, Saikus CE, Schroder JN, Klinger RY. Transapical ProtekDuo rapid deployment cannula as temporary left ventricular assist device in a Jehovah's witness patient. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Dec;35(12):3735-3742. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.009

  11. Singh R, Chandel A, Paras J, et al. Transapical cannulation with a dual lumen cannula for mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2022;68(11):e215-e219. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001683

  12. Ghannam AD, Babu AN, Jeng EI. Protek Duo Rapid Deployment cannulation utilized to bridge to durable heartware left ventricular assist device. J Card Surg. 2020;35(8):2067-2069. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14775

  13. Lima B, Hufton AD, Hussain ST. Minimally invasive off-pump technique for temporary left ventricular support. ASAIO J. 2022;68(1):e1-e4. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001404

  14. Wong ASK, Sin SWC. Short-term mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, TandemHeart): a review. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(13):829. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2171.

  15. Zein R, Patel C, Mercado-Alamo A, Schreiber T, Kaki A. A review of the Impella devices. Interv Cardiol. 2022;17:e05. doi: 10.15420/icr.2021.11.

  16. Usman AA, Spelde AE, Cevasco M, et al. Technical considerations for percutaneous pulmonary artery cannulation for mechanical circulatory support. JTCVS Tech. 2023;18:65-73.

  17. Usman AA, Spelde AE, Olia SE, et al. J. First-in-man successful use of the SPECTRUM percutaneous dual-stage right ventricle and right atrium to pulmonary artery ventricular assist device. J Card Surg. 2022;37(10):3403-3407.

  18. Spelde AE, Hernandez-Morgan ME, Augoustides JG. Advances in mechanical support for right ventricular failure. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(8):3289-3291.



AFFILIATIONS

1 Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery,

2 Department of Anesthesiology,

3 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease; The University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital. Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.



Funding: none.

Disclosure: the authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.



CORRESPONDENCE

Dr. Erik J. Orozco-Hernández. E-mail: eorozcohernandez@uabmc.edu




Received: 16-09-2025. Accepted: 02-11-2025.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
CC BY-NC-ND

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Card Mex. 2026;11