medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3011 (Electronic)

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd 2022; 41 (1)

Three-dimensional printing: descriptive study of student perception in a teaching experience in occupational therapy

Pinilla GCF, Herrera AEA, Cortés CME

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 1-7
PDF size: 230.00 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is positioned as a complement to health sciences education due to its versatility and specific applications in various areas.
Objective: Describe the perception of Occupational Therapy students about an experience of design and manufacture of orthoses/prostheses.
Methods: Quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study. The population corresponded to students of Occupational Therapy career, studying fifth semester. The sample was of an intentional type. An academic experience was implemented. The perception that the students had about the experience was evaluated through a structured survey in a Likert format, the answers were analyzed according to the frequency of responses for each item. Ethical aspects were safeguarded through informed consents.
Results: Eight students participated, who "Strongly agree" or "Agree" with most of the statements, highlighting the contribution of the intervention for teaching purposes.
Conclusion: 3D printing applied to the field of design and manufacture of orthoses/prostheses was a well-evaluated experience. It is possible to be implemented for the acquisition of the necessary skills for orthoses/prostheses manufacture . It is concluded that the use of 3D printing in education, as well as in clinical applications has concrete options for implementation.


REFERENCES

  1. Coronel J, Palacio J, Rueda-Esteban R. Multiple Software Based 3D Modeling protocol for printing anatomical structures. Int J Morphol. 2017;35(2):425-429. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000200006

  2. Wu A, Wang K, Wang J, Chen C, Yang X, Ni W, Hu Y. The addition of 3D printed models to enhance the teaching and learning of bone spatial anatomy and fractures for undergraduate students: a randomized controlled study. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(20):403. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.09.59

  3. Jahnke P, Schwarz F, Ziegert M, Almasi T, Abdelhadi O, Nunninger M, Hamm B, Scheel M. A radiopaque 3D printed, anthropomorphic phantom for simulation of CT-guided procedures. European Radiol. 2018;28(11):4818-4823. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5481-4

  4. Gauger V, Rooney D, Kovatch K, Richey L, Powell A, Berhe H, Zopf D. A multidisciplinary international collaborative implementing low cost, high fidelity 3D printed airway models to enhance Ethiopian anesthesia resident emergency cricothyroidotomy skills. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;114:124-128. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.08.040

  5. Zhao Z, Xu S, Wood B, Tse Z. 3D printing endobronchial models for surgical training and simulation. J Imaging. 2018;4(11):135. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4110135

  6. Inzunza O, Caro I, Mondragón G, Baeza F, Burdiles Á, Salgado G. Impresiones 3D, nueva tecnología que apoya la docencia anatómica. Int J Morphol. 2015;33(3):1176-1182. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000300059

  7. Rúa E, Jiménez F, Gutiérrez, Villamizar N. Impresión 3D como herramienta didáctica para la enseñanza de algunos conceptos de ingeniería y diseño. Ingeniería. 2017;23(1):70-83. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/23448393.12248

  8. Piccoli G. Thinking in 3D: a future for dialysis? J Nephrol. 2018;31(6):795-796. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-018-0520-4

  9. Aquino R, Barile S, Grasso A, Saviano M. Envisioning smart and sustainable healthcare: 3D Printing technologies for personalized medication. Futures. 2018; 103: 35-50. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.002

  10. Velasco I, Ramos H, Vahdani S. Manejo quirúrgico de tumor mandibular asitido con la tecnología de impresión tridimensional: nota técnica y reporte de un caso. Rev Chil Cir. 2016;69(4):332-340. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rchic.2016.09.007

  11. Brunso J, Prol C, Franco M, de Carlos, f, Martin J, Santamaría. Guías y miniplacas personalizadas: un protocolo guiado para cirugía ortognática. Rev Esp Cir Oral Maxilofac. 2017;39(1):7-14. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maxilo.2016.05.001 12. Patterson RM, Salatin B, Janson R, Salinas SP, Mullins MJS. A current snapshot of the state of 3D printing in hand rehabilitation. J Hand Ther. 2020;33(2):156-163. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.018

  12. Benham S, San S. Student technology acceptance of 3D printing in occupational therapy education. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(3):1-7. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.035402

  13. Schwartz JK, Fermin A, Fine K, Iglesias N, Pivarnik D, Struck S, Varela N, Janes WE. Methodology and feasibility of a 3D printed assistive technology intervention. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(2):141-147. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1539877

  14. Lee KH, Kim DK, Cha YH, Kwon JY, Kim DH, Kim SJ. Personalized assistive device manufactured by 3D modelling and printing techniques. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(5):526-531. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1494217

  15. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). 2006. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

  16. Sirhan M, Triviño X. Evaluación de una experiencia de capacitación en planificación educacional para directores de programas de las especialidades médicas. Rev Méd Chile. 2012;140(4):530-537. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872012000400017

  17. Triviño X, Sirhan M, Moore P, Montero L. Impacto de un programa de formación en docencia en una escuela de medicina. Rev Méd Chile. 2011; 139(11):1508-1515. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872011001100019

  18. Zhu Z, Ji X, Gao Z, Hu G, 2017. A morphometric study of auricular concha in the population of young Chinese adults. Int J Morphol. 2017;35(4):1451-1458. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000401451

  19. Molina R, Pender G, Moro L, Piovan M. Comportamiento al creep de un polímero utilizado para impresión 3D. Matéria (Rio J). 2018;23(2). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620180002.0412

  20. Álvarez K, Lagos R, Aizpun M, 2016. Influencia del porcentaje de relleno en la resistencia mecánica en impresión 3D, por medio del método de Modelado por Deposición Fundida. Ingeniare- Rev Chil Ing. 2016;24:17-24. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052016000500003

  21. Hecht P, Larrazábal A. Uso de nuevos recursos tecnológicos en la docencia de un curso de anatomía con orientación clínica para estudiantes de medicina. Int J Morphol. 2018;36(3):821-828. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022018000300821

  22. Novak E, Wisdom S. Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. J Sci Educ Technol. 2018;27:412-432. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5

  23. Pérez-Mañanes R, Calvo-Haro J, Arnal-Burro J. Nuestra experiencia con impresión 3D doméstica en Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Hazlo tú mismo. Rev Latinoamer Cir Ortop. 2016;1(2):47-53. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rslaot.2016.06.004

  24. Cortés, MEC, Herrera Aliaga, EA. Modelo pedagógico de simulación clínica: su aplicación en la formación de profesionales de la salud. Rev Varela. 2019;53(19):194-207. Disponible en: http://revistavarela.uclv.edu.cu/articulos/rv5304.pdf

  25. Buehler E, Comrie N, Hofmann M, McDonald S, Hurst A. Investigating the implications of 3D printing in special education. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2016;8(3):2870640. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1145/2870640




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com