Trueba-Gómez R, Estrada-Juárez H

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 64-66
PDF size: 128.53 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Avent ND, Reid ME. The Rh blood group system: a review. Blood. 2000; 95: 375-387.

2. Westhoff CM. The Rh blood group system in review: a new facefor the next decade. Transfusion. 2004; 44: 1663-1673.

3. Flegel WA. Molecular genetics and clinical applications for RH.Transfus Apher Sci. 2011; 44: 81-91.

4. International Society of Blood Transfusion. Red CellImmunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology Working Party.Current blood group allele tables. Amsterdam: InternationalSociety of Blood Transfusion.

5. Estrada-Juárez H. Uso de la biología computacional para compararlas estructuras terciarias teóricas de las formas más comunes deRhCE y RhD. Rev Mex Med Transfus. 2024; 16 (Supl 1): S10-S13.

6. Sandler SG, Flegel WA, Westhoff CM et al. It is time to phase inRhD genotyping for patients with a serologic weak D phenotype.Transfusion. 2015; 55: 680-689.

7. Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies.Association Bulletin #24-02: Use of Rh Immune Globulin andConsiderations in the Setting of Supply Shortages and LimitedAvailability. Bethesda (MD): Association for the Advancement ofBlood & Biotherapies; 2024.

8. Floch A, Pirenne F, Barrault A, Chami B, Toly-Ndour C, TournamilleC et al. Insights into anti-D formation in carriers of RhD variantsthrough studies of 3D intraprotein interactions. Transfusion. 2021;61 (4): 1286-1301.

9. Trueba-Gómez R, Rosenfeld-Mann F, Baptista-González HA,Domínguez-López ML, Estrada-Juárez H. Use of computationalbiology to compare the theoretical tertiary structures of the mostcommon forms of RhCE and RhD. Vox Sang. 2023; 118 (10): 881-890.

10. Trueba GR, Estrada JH. Regiones antigénicas de variantes D débil.Rev Mex Med Transfus. 2024; 16 (Suppl: 1): s51-54.