medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Crítica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • Policies
  • Lineamientos
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2026, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2026; 40 (4)

Comparison of the procalcitonin/albumin ratio vs inflammatory markers as predictors of mortality in head trauma

Bermúdez LC, Galves BC, García LR, Fuentes OC, Michael BMH, Adame MI
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/124249

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/124249
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/124249

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 274-280
PDF size: 691.73 Kb.


Key words:

traumatic brain injury, procalcitonin, albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, biomarkers, mortality.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: traumatic brain injury (TBI) is currently a public health problem that has a social and clinical impact on the country. It is estimated that the incidence of 800 cases per 100,000 inhabitants worldwide, and the inflammatory mechanisms are not fully understood. A study comparing different biomarkers, such as the procalcitonin/albumin ratio, with mortality risk and other markers could lead to the early identification of new therapeutic targets. Objective: to compare the procalcitonin/albumin ratio with other inflammatory markers as predictors of mortality, such as C-reactive protein, albumin, CRP/albumin ratios, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios in patients with head trauma November 2024 to August 2025. Material and methods: this was a prospective, analytical, longitudinal study conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The study included all patients with head trauma who were evaluated six hours after hospitalization or admission to the ICU with biomarkers of interest, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, CRP/albumin ratios, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios, and procalcitonin/albumin. Regarding statistical analysis, inferential analyses will be performed using independent groups tests such as Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney U test. Class analysis will be evaluated using a χ2 test, and a p value < 0.05 will be considered significant. Results: in the study population, the majority were men with 45 (65.2%), in terms of classification or severity of TBI, both patients with severe and moderate classification reported a very similar frequency with 36 (52.2%) and 30 (43.5%); respectively. Finally, 18 (26.1%) deaths were recorded in the population. When comparing according to each of the biochemical values with respect to the patient’s discharge, it stood out that the parameters of procalcitonin, CRP, CRP/albumin ratio, Procalcitonin/albumin and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio showed significant results p ≤ 0.05. When associating the severity of the TBI with the patient’s outcome, it was noted that the highest incidence of mortality occurred in the severe group, with 15 (41.7%) of the total group, compared to those who suffered a moderate TBI, where 3 (10.0%) died, resulting in a significant result of p = 0.008. ROC curve analyses were performed on the procalcitonin/albumin ratio, which showed a cutoff point of 0.67 (sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 35.3%), with a result of p = 0.037. Conclusion: in the independent analysis according to outcome, the procalcitonin, procalcitonin/albumin, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio indicators showed higher values in the deceased patients; Furthermore, the utility assessed through the area under the curve of procalcitonin, procalcitonin/albumin and neutrophil/lymphocyte were clinically relevant in the population.


REFERENCES

  1. Steyerberg EW, Wiegers E, Sewalt C, et al. Case-mix, carepathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury inCENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal,cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(10):923-934.

  2. Siesjo BK. Mechanisms of ischemic brain damage. Crit CareMed. 1988;16(10):954-963.

  3. Giner J, Mesa GL, Yus TS, et al. El traumatismo craneoencefálicosevero en el nuevo milenio. Nueva población y nuevo manejo.Neurología. 2022;37(5):383-389.

  4. Fernández-Salgueró PF, Echevarría RVC, Barrera CJM.Traumatismos craneoencefálicos. Escalas de valoración parala medida de resultados en rehabilitación. Rehabilitación (Madr).2002;36(6):408-417.

  5. Martínez-Ricarte F. Fisiopatología del traumatismocraneoencefálico. clasificación de las lesiones cerebralestraumáticas: lesiones primarias y secundarias; concepto deherniación cerebral. Neurotrauma.net.

  6. Jiménez CCM, Bracamontes MRG, Reyes MM. Utilidadde la procalcitonina en el diagnóstico temprano de laneumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica, en el traumacraneoencefálico severo. Med Crit. 2009;23(4):218-224.

  7. Gürsoy C, Gürsoy G, Demirbilek SG. C-reactive protein-albuminratio and procalcitonin in predicting intensive care unit mortalityin traumatic brain injury. Acute Crit Care. 2022;37(3):462-467.

  8. Ge X, Zhu L, Li M, et al. A novel blood inflammatory indicator forpredicting deterioration risk of mild traumatic brain injury. FrontAging Neurosci. 2022;14:878484.

  9. Marx C, Naylor J, Kilts J, et al. Neurosteroids and inflammatorymarkers in PTSD and TBI. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81(10):S304.

  10. Mubashir T, Ahmad HS, Lai H, et al. Effect of obstructive sleepapnea on outcomes after traumatic brain injury: a retrospectivecohort analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2022;37(1):228-235.

  11. Rodríguez SA, Cervera E, Valencia VG, Villalba APJ. Review:neuronal and glial biomarkers as quantitative approach toclassify the severity of traumatic brain injury. Salud Uninorte.2016;32(2):302-318.

  12. Urquizo AG, Arteaga CR, Chacón YP. Utilidad de los reactantesde fase aguda en el diagnóstico clínico. Rev Med La Paz.2019;25(2):91-98.

  13. Kumar RG, Boles JA, Wagner AK. Chronic inflammation aftersevere traumatic brain injury: characterization and associationswith outcome at 6 and 12 months postinjury. J Head TraumaRehabil. 2015;30(6):369-381.

  14. Zindel J, Kubes P. DAMPs, PAMPs, and LAMPs in immunity andsterile inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol. 2020;15:493-518.

  15. Johnson NH, Hadad R, Taylor RR, et al. Inflammatorybiomarkers of traumatic brain injury. Pharmaceuticals (Basel).2022;15(6):660.

  16. Begum G, Reddy R, Yakoub KM, et al. Differential expression ofcirculating inflammatory proteins following sport-related traumaticbrain injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(4):1216.

  17. Ghaith HS, Nawar AA, Gabra MD, et al. A literaturereview of traumatic brain injury biomarkers. Mol Neurobiol.2022;59(7):4141-4158.

  18. Llompart-Poua JA, Talayerob M, Homara J, et al. Fallomultiorgánico en el paciente con trauma grave. Med Intensiva.2014;38(7):455-462.

  19. Réus GZ, Fries GR, Stertz L, et al. The role of inflammationand microglial activation in the pathophysiology of psychiatricdisorders. Neuroscience. 2015;300:141-154.

  20. Mendoza DA, López KD, Echeverri RA, Pastor L, RuedaS, Fernández LL, et al. Utility of biomarkers in traumaticbrain injury: a narrative review. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol.2020;48(3):155-161

  21. Müller M, Schwerdtfeger K, Maier B, et al. Cerebral blood flowvelocity and inflammatory response after severe traumatic braininjury. Eur J Ultrasound. 2001;12(3):203-208.

  22. Liu D, Su L, Han G, Yan P, Xie L. Prognostic value ofprocalcitonin in adult patients with sepsis: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129450.

  23. Yoon JH, Choi WS, Lim YS, Jang JH. Comparison of prognosticperformance between procalcitonin and procalcitonin-toalbuminratio in post cardiac arrest syndrome. J Clin Med.2023;12(14):4568.

  24. Gruys E, Toussaint MJ, Niewold TA, Koopmans SJ. Acutephase reaction and acute phase proteins. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B.2005;6(11):1045-1056.

  25. Vikse J, Henry BM, Roy J, Ramakrishnan PK, Tomaszewski KA,Walocha JA. The role of serum procalcitonin in the diagnosisof bacterial meningitis in adults: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Int J Infect Dis. 2015;38:68-76.

  26. Name BO, Fernández LA, Luaces CC. Procalcitonina: una nuevaherramienta diagnóstica en la infección bacteriana. Med Clin(Barc). 2002;119(18):707-14.

  27. Higashikawa T, Okuro M, Ishigami K, et al. Procalcitonin andalbumin as prognostic biomarkers in elderly patients with a riskof bacterial infection. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(7):2606-2614.

  28. Sun M, Gu L, Li Y, et al. Procalcitonin/albumin ratio predicts theoutcome after severe traumatic brain injury: a propensity scorematchedanalysis. Neurocrit Care. 2024;40(2):664-673.

  29. Sánchez R, Gutiérrez C, Ángeles César M, Pastor R, VilanovaÀ. Procalcitonina y proteína C reactiva en el diagnóstico deneumonías bacterianas en pacientes de urgencias. Revista dellaboratorio clínico. 2008;1(2):59-63.

  30. Barba EJR. Procalcitonina. Su papel como biomarcador desepsis. Rev Mex Patol Clin. 2008;55(3):157-167.

  31. Deng S, Gao J, Zhao Z, et al. Albumin/procalcitonin ratio is asensitive early marker of nosocomial blood stream infection inpatients with intra-cerebral hemorrhage. Surg Infect (Larchmt).2019;20(8):643-649.

  32. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemicresponses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(6):448-454.

  33. Wang R, Hua Y, He M, Xu J. Prognostic value of serumprocalcitonin based model in moderate to severe traumatic braininjury patients. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:4981-4993.

  34. Goyal K, Iyer VN, Gavriilidis P, Soonawalla Z. Procalcitoninas a biomarker in traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg.2020;136:130-134.

  35. Alrawahi AN, Al-Riyami AZ, Essa JS, Ms AM. The role of serumprocalcitonin in predicting sepsis and organ failure in critically illtrauma patients. Trauma Mon. 2019;24(1).

  36. Chen J, Qu X, Li Z, Zhang D, Hou L. Peak neutrophil-tolymphocyteratio correlates with clinical outcomes in patients withsevere traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(2):334-339.

  37. Ozeren E. Is C-reactive protein-albumin ratio or neutrophillymphocyteratio a better indicator to predict in-hospital mortalityin traumatic brain injury? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg.2022;28(10):1482-1487.




CC BY-NC-ND

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Crit. 2026;40