medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2003, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2003; 48 (4)

Inguinal hernioplasty: A comparison of tension and tension-free techniques prospective and randomized study in the Hospital General de Mexico

Elizalde MA, Chapa AO, Garza FJH, Mauricio HL, Elizalde ÁN, Escalante TT
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 204-209
PDF size: 60.37 Kb.


Key words:

Inguinal hernia, hernioplastia, Shouldice, Lichtenstein and Rutkow.

ABSTRACT

Background: Currently, the most successful anterior techniques for inguinal hernia repair are the Shouldice technique (“tension” repair), the Lichtenstein procedure, and the Rutkow repair (both of which require a polypropylene mesh). We are seeking the most suitable technique for the Mexican patient. Materials and methods: We conducted a longitudinal, prospective, randomized clinical trial, on patients diagnosed with inguinal hernias that attend Mexico’s General Hospital. The independent variable was the surgical repair technique, either the Shouldice procedure, the Lichtenstein repair, or the Rutkow technique. The dependent variables were operative complications, total surgical time, postoperative complications, time elapsed to recover physical activity, time to recover full-work activity, and hernia recurrence. Results: We operated 100 patients with inguinal hernia. The Shouldice procedure was performed on 37 patients, the Lichtenstein repair was performed on 32 patients, and the Rutkow technique was performed on 31 patients. Total operative time was 70 minutes for the Shouldice repair, 58 minutes for the Lichtenstein repair, and 57 minutes for the Rutkow repair. Five patients suffered operative complications: 3 patients received general anesthesia because of incomplete regional anesthesia, and 2 patients had adverse reactions to the prophylactic antibiotic. Postoperative complications included acute urinary retention in 2 patients, postoperative neuralgia in 5 patients, hydrocele in 2 patients, and one patient suffred presented with a hematoma. In average, pain lasted 4.18 days in the Shouldice procedure group, 2.3 days in the Lichtenstein repair group, and 2.2 days in the Rutkow technique group. Time to recover physical activity was 6.5 days for the Shouldice repair group, 3.3 days for the Lichtenstein technique group, and 2.2 days for the Rutkow procedure group. Time to recover full-work activity was 16.2 days for the Shouldice repair group, 13.6 for the Lichtenstein technique group, and 9.4 days for the Rutkow procedure group. Postoperative follow-up is currently 90% at 12 months. Conclusion: Our preliminary results show a tendency for less pain and faster recovery with the use of polypropylene mesh for inguinal hernia repair. Final results, including statistical analysis, are yet to come.


REFERENCES

  1. Rutkow MI, Robbins AW. Classification systems and groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 1998; 78 (6): 1117-1127.

  2. Abrahamson J. Hernias. Maingot’s abdominal operations. 10th ed. Stanford, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1997; 479.

  3. Goldstein H. S. A university experience using mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2002; 5: 182-185.

  4. Mokete M, Earnshaw JJ. Evolution of an inguinal hernia surgery practice. Postgrad Med J 2001, 77: 188-190.

  5. Welsh DRJ, Alexander MAJ. Shouldice technique. Surg Clin North Am 1993; 3: 485-504.

  6. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE. Lichtenstein repair. Surg Clin North Am 1998; 6: 967-986.

  7. Robbins AW, Rutkow IM. Mesh Plug Repair. Surg Clin North Am 1998; 6: 951-966.

  8. Deysine M. Hernia clinic in a teaching institution: Creation and development. Hernia 2001; 5: 65-69.

  9. Welsh DRJ, Alexander MAJ. Shouldice Technique. Surg Clin North Am 1993; 3: 485-504.

  10. Heise CP, Starling JR. Mesh inguinodynia: A new clinical syndrome after inguinal herniorrhaphy? J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 514-518.

  11. LeBlanc KA. Complications associated with the plug-and-patch method of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Hernia 2001; 5: 135-138.

  12. Peiper Ch, Junge K, Füting A, Bassalay P, Conze J, Schumpelick V. Inguinal tensile strength and pain level after Shouldice repair. Hernia 2001; 5: 129-134.

  13. Vos P, Simons M, Luitse J, Geldere D, Koelemaij M, Obertop H. Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. Questionnaire compared with physical examination: a prospective study in 299 patients. Eur J Surg 1998; 164: 533-536.

  14. Dakkuri RA, Ludwig DJ, Traverso LW. Should bilateral inguinal hernias be repaired during one operation? Am J Surg 2002; 183: 554-557.

  15. Oberlin P. Faut-il operer toutes les hernies de l’aine? Ann Chir 2002; 127: 161-163.

  16. Cervantes J, Rojas G, Guadarrama E. Hernioplastia inguinal abierta vs laparoscópica. Estudio comparativo de tiempo quirúrgico, días de hospitalización y costos. Cir Gen 1998: 20 (4): 300-303.

  17. Ortiz J, Orozco P, De la fuente M. Una opción más en la reparación de la hernia inguinal. An Med Asoc Hosp ABC 2001; 46 (3): 122-125.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC. 2003;48