medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2008, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2008; 65 (3)

Clinical effective of the formocresol vs hydroxide of calcium in pulpotomy of primary teeth: Preliminary report

Durán CBE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 117-120
PDF size: 79.13 Kb.


Key words:

Pulpotomy, formocresol, calcium hidroxide.

ABSTRACT

Background: Formocresol from its beginning, has been a controversial medicament for it’s properties. Objective: To determine the clinical effectiveness of formocresol vs calcium hidroxide in pulpotomy on primary teeth. Method: Cuasiexperimental study. Twelve patients of the Clinica Multidisciplinaria Reforma of the UNAM, were treated with both medicaments having a total of 24 pulpotomy. Results: The clinical effectiveness of formocresol was determined in 91.7%. Conclusions: In spite of the controversy that still exists on its use, formocresol continues being the ideal product for pulpotomy treatment in primary teeth.


REFERENCES

  1. Andlaw RJ, Rock WP. Manual de odontopediatría. 2da edición. México: Interamericana McGraw-Hill, 1990: 103- 111.

  2. Rosendahl R. Partial pulpotomy and pulpectomy. Therapy of treatment in traumatized temporary teeth. J Endodont 1998; 4(2): 34-41.

  3. Pinkham JR. Odontología pediátrica. México: Interamericana McGraw-Hill, 1991: 269-275.

  4. Espinosa-Torres A, Reyes-Velásquez JO. Mecanismos de la respuesta inmune mediada por células que actúan en la inflamación pulpar. Med Oral 2001; 3(1): 174-176.

  5. Ingle J, Bakland LK. Endodoncia. 4ta edición. México: Interamericana McGraw-Hill, 1996: 889-905.

  6. Ranly DM, García-Godoy F. Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. J Dent 2000; 28: 153-161.

  7. De Armas MM, Climada CL, Ramos CL. Uso de formocresol diluido en dientes temporales. Rev Cubana Estomatol 1998; 35(1): 5-10.

  8. Aguirre-Aguilar AA, Nájera-García S. Evolución de la pulpotomía en dientes primarios. PO 1997; 18(2): 34-38.

  9. Pérez GG. Curas formocresoladas en dientes permanentes. Acta Odontol Venezol 1995; 33(1): 17-22.

  10. Prieto PM, Pérez GG. Recubrimiento pulpar directo con hidróxido de calcio en molares primarios: casos clínicos. Acta Odontol Venezol 2003; 41(2): 20-24.

  11. Cortés LM. Pulpotomía [serial on line] 2003 Mar; 3 (1): Available from: URL: http://www.odontoweb/odontolo giaparatodos.com

  12. Droter J. Pulp therapy in primary teeth. J Dent Child 1980; 34: 507-10.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2008;65