medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología

Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2007; 81 (4)

Correlación objetivo-cosmética del resultado de la cirugía para la corrección del estrabismo horizontal

Acevedo-González PJ, Pérez-Pérez JF, Arroyo-Yllanes ME, Fonte-Vázquez A, Murillo-Murillo L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 209-213
PDF size: 47.09 Kb.


Key words:

Strabismus, surgical result.

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study was designed to correlate the objective measurement in prismatic diopters (PD) to the subjective appreciation of the surgical alignment result in strabismus patients.
Method: A prospective study including strabismus patients after horizontal surgical alignment was done. Four strabismus specialists in a random fashion graded the results: E, excellent, apparent orthoposition. B good, small deviation. R: Fair, noticeable deviation. M bad, large deviation. Then we correlate with the objective measurement.
Results: We included 79 patients. The subjective evaluation showed that 39 cases where E, (49.37%), 29 patients B, (36.71%), 10 patients R, (12.66%) and one patient M (1.26%). The objective assessment shows 49 patients (62.03%) within 10 DP of ortho.
Conclusions: In the evaluation of the surgical success we need to consider other factors beside the pure objective measurement of the 10 PD of ortho.


REFERENCES

  1. Duke Elder. Text Book of Ophthalmology; Vol. IV. Henry Kimpton, Londres, 1949.

  2. Hertle R. Clinical Characteristics of Surgically Treated Adult Strabismus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1998; 35:138-145.

  3. Farley D. Alignin Eyes. FDA Consumer 1991; 25(9): 2-16.

  4. Helveston EM y cols. Surgical Treatment of Congenital Esotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 96:218-228.

  5. Darron AB, Martin CW. Contemporary Pediatrics 2000; 17(2): 49.

  6. Mruthyunjaya P y cols. Subjective and Objective Outcomes of Strabismus Surgery in Children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1996; 33(3):167-170.

  7. Kushner BJ. Postoperative binocularity in adults with longstanding strabismus: is surgery cosmetic only? Am Orth J 1990; 40:64-67.

  8. Billson FA. Accuracy in strabismus surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79:3.

  9. Ezenauer RW. Prospective investigation of the effectiveness of intraoperative adjustable sutures for the correction of strabismus. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1994; 92:993-997.

  10. Wisnicki H y cols. A Comparison of the Success Rates of Resident and Attending Strabismus Surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1993; 30(2):118-121.

  11. Burke JP y cols. Psychosocial Implications of Strabismus Surgery in Adults. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1997; 34(3):159-164.

  12. Satterfield D, Keltner JL, Morrison TL. Psychosocial aspects of Strabismus Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111:1100-1105.

  13. Bronlarczyk-Loba y cols. Results of strabismus surgery in adolescents and adults: cosmetic or functional recovery?. Klin Oczna 1995; 97:68-71.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2007;81