medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2008, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2008; 22 (4)

Identification of lumbar foramina with percutaneous pins. A cadaveric study

Montes GC, Guzmán LJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 233-237
PDF size: 180.19 Kb.


Key words:

lumbar disc herniation, endoscopy, discectomy, cadaveric study.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Patients diagnosed with a lumbar disc hernia and nerve root compression, in which conservative treatment failed are candidates for lumbar discectomy. This technique often results in failed spine surgery syndrome which includes different complications such as arachnoiditis, discitis, and sac tears resulting in pain and neurological deficit. This has led to research of minimally invasive surgery in which the medullary canal is not involved and is performed under local anesthesia. In order to perform this technique, the anatomical and radiological identification of the intervertebral foramina is necessary. Kambin’s triangle is an anatomical safe place for percutaneous procedures. Objectives: 1) To identify Kambin’s triangle in the cadaver and its anatomical elements. 2) To describe the relationship between cutaneous lines traced on the patient with the anatomic elements in the cadaver by using guide needles. 3) To describe the position of the surgical instruments used in a posterolateral discectomy approach to identify the triangle. Methods: 1) Dissection through a standard approach to L1-L5 foramina. 2) Observation of the anatomic planes that the guide needle follows. 3) Radiological study of the foramen. 4) Positioning of the surgical instruments on the foramen to establish the size and space. Results: 1) The intervertebral foramina were dissected and the anatomical components of Kambin’s triangle were identified, also we compared size of this triangle (10 mm) and compared it with surgical instruments (7 mm). 2) Skin lines were tested as reliable and safe routes to identify foramina. 3) We proved safety of endoscopic surgery instruments by a posterolateral approach. 4) A visual aid was developed for adequate placement of the guide needle through the foramen. Conclusions: 1) Foramina need to be perfectly identified with image techniques so that the surgical instruments can be placed safely. 2) Skin lines are a safe and reliable guide. 3) The technique is safe if performed through Kambin’s triangle.


REFERENCES

  1. Kambin P, Schaffer JL: Percutaneous lumbar discectomy: reviewing 100 patients and current practice. Clin Orthop 1989; 238: 24-39.

  2. Spurling RG, Grantham EG: Neurologic picture of herniations of the nucleos pulposus in the lower part of the lumbar region. Arch Surg 1940; 40: 375-88.

  3. Norlen G: On the value of neurological symptoms in sciatica for the localization of lumbar disc herniation. Acta Chir Scand 1944; 45(7): 95.

  4. RAAF J: Some observations regardin 905 patients operated upon for protruded lumbar intervertebral disc. Am J Surg 1959; 97(4): 388-97.

  5. Weir BKA: Prospective study of 100 lumbosacres dissections. J Neuro Surg 1979; 50: 283-9.

  6. Mixter WJ, Barr JS: Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal cord. New Engl J Med 1934; 211: 210-4.

  7. Mixter WJ: Rupture of the intervertebral disc; a short history of this evolution as a syndrome of importance to the surgeon. JAMA 1949; 140(3): 278-82.

  8. Wilkinson HA: The failed back syndrome: ethiology and therapy. Ed. 2 New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992: 209-18.

  9. Benner B, Ehni G: Spinal arachnoiditis: the post-operative variety in particular. Spine 1978; 3(1): 40-4.

  10. Smolik EA, Nash FP: Lumbar spinal arachnoiditis: a complication of intervertebral disc operation. Ann Surg 1951; 133(4): 490-5.

  11. Greenwood J, MacGuire TH, Kimbol F: Study of the causes of failure in the herniated intervertebral disc operation: an analysis of 67 reoperated cases. J Neurosurg 1952; 9(1): 15-20.

  12. North RB, Campbell JN, Eral JC: Failed back surgery syndrome: 5 years follow up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation. Neurosurg 1991; 2865: 685-91.

  13. Yeung AT, Tsou PM: Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Clinical case series. Spine 2002; 27(7): 722-31.

  14. Paul M, Tsou MD, Christopher A, Young MD, Anthony T, Yeung MD: Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar descogenic pain, a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure. Spine J 2004; 4: 564-73.

  15. Yeung AT, Yeung CA: Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38(3): 363-72.

  16. Yeung AT, Yeung CA: Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 255-63.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2008 Jul-Ago;22