medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Investigación Clínica

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Invest Clin 2006; 58 (6)

International family medicine certification exam in Venezuela: the physician’s experience

Ledesma-Solaeche FM, Romero-Nerio E, Atencio CM, Pineda F, Fernández MÁ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 561-566
PDF size: 58.16 Kb.


Key words:

Certification, Recertification, Family medicine.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To present opinions of physicians participating in a pilot certification exam in the specialty of Family Medicine implemented in Venezuela, in December 2004, by the Mexican Board of Certification of Family Medicine A.C. Design. Descriptive, transversal. Methods. Participant physicians (n:37) completed semi-structured questionnaries: one or two weeks before the exam, and immediately after it. Results. 60% of participants were 41-50 years old and 80% women. All of them were practicing physicians; 49% had 5-10 year experience in family medicine. Main motivation to participate in the exam: the need for continuing learning (83%). Results showed their participation motivated continuing education (46%). Books were the most frequently utilized resource when preparing for the exam (54%). 94% were willing to take the exam again in the future, and all would recommend it to their colleagues. 49% said that examination should be taken every 3-4 years and should be voluntary (54%). 86% considered the content of the exam pertinent to their practice while 54% mentioned it was well adapted to their country’s reality. Time for the exam was enough according to 71%, and number of questions was considered excessive by 89%. After the exam, 43% estimated to have personal prognosis for excellent or good outcomes. Conclusions. The international examination was satisfactory, stimulated desires of update, and the participants would repeat and recommend it in the future. The Mexican experience offers an example to put into practice, and the international collaboration would be a valid option to extend the certification processes in Latin America.


REFERENCES

  1. Zurro AM. Evaluación de la formación posgraduada, certificación y recertificación profesional de los médicos de familia en diferentes países (Reino Unido, Estados Unidos, Canadá, Holanda, Australia y España). Aten Primaria 2002; Vol. 15, 30(1): 46-56.

  2. American Board of Family Practice. 11 de abril de 2005. Disponible en: URL: http:// www.abfp.org.

  3. College of Family Physicians of Canada. 11 de abril de 2005. Disponible en: URL: http://www.cfpc.ca.

  4. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. 14 de abril de 2005. Disponible en: URL: http:// www.racgp.org.au.

  5. Royal College of General Practitioners. 18 de abril de 2005. Disponible en: URL: http://www.rcgp.org.uk.

  6. Consejo Mexicano de Certificación en Medicina Familiar. 22 de febrero de 2005. Disponible en: URL: http://www.conmedfam.org.mx.

  7. Sociedad Venezolana de Medicina Familiar. Reglamento de Certificación. 11 de febrero de 2005. Disponible en: URL: http://www.sovemefa.org/rcert.htm.

  8. Aguilar UA. Opinión sobre la certificación de la especialidad de Medicina Familiar, Venezuela 2001. Médico de Familia 2004; 12(1): 13-17.

  9. Fernández OMA, Yanez PEJ. La certificación y recertificación médica en México. Boletín Atención Familiar 2004. 11 de abril de 2005. Disponible en: URL: http://www.facmed.unam.mx/deptos/familiar/atfm116/.

  10. Primera Reunión Iberoamericana de Expertos en Certificación Profesional y Acreditación de Programas de Medicina Familiar. Declaración de Margarita. WONCA-Región Iberoamericana-CIMF/OPS. Médico de Familia 2003; 11(2): 6-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Invest Clin. 2006;58