medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2009; 10 (1)

Laparoscopy in the assessment of patients with pancreatic cancer

Lucena JR, Useche IC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 115-125
PDF size: 91.32 Kb.


Key words:

Pancreatic cancer, laparoscopy, TAC, ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography.

ABSTRACT

Background: In recent years have brought important developments in preoperative imaging and use of laparoscopic staging for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Study design. We conducted a review of all patients with surgical managed pancreatic adenocarcinoma, using data from cancer registry of our institution, augmented with clinical information from primary medical record review. We documented the use of all staging modalities, including TAC, endoscopic ultrasonography and laparoscopy. Primary outcomes included resection with curative intent. The association between staging modalities, clinical features, and resection was measured using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: There were 68 patients who met the eligibility criteria. Patients were staged using a combination of TAC (98%), laparoscopy (29%), and endoscopic ultrasonography (32%). The overall proportion of patients who went to surgical exploration and were resected was 89%. Of the patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, metastatic disease that precluded resection was discovered in 37.6%. For patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and were not resected, vascular invasion was the most common determinant of irresectability (66.6%). In multivariate analysis, preoperative weight loss and surgeon decision to use laparoscopy predicted irresectability at laparotomy. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that surgeon appear to use laparoscopy in a subset of patients at high risk for metastatic disease. The combination of current staging techniques is associated with a high proportion of resectability for patients taken to surgical exploration.


REFERENCES

  1. Jemal A, Murria T, Ward E. Cancer statistics 2005. CA. Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 1030.

  2. Mayo SC, Austin DF, Sheppard BC, Mori M, Shipley DK, Billingsley. Evolving Preoperative Evaluation of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: Does Laparoscopy Have a Role in the Current Era? J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 87-95.

  3. Berger HG, Rau B, Gansauge F. Treatment of pancreatic cancer: challenge of the facts. World J Surg 2003; 27: 1075-1084.

  4. Conlon KC, Dougherry E, Klimstra DS. The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 134-140.

  5. Yeo JC, Abrams RA, Grochow LB. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single institution experience. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 621-633.

  6. Maire F, Hammel P, Ponsot P. Long-term outcome of biliary and duodenal stents in palliative treatment of patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 735-742.

  7. Karmazanovsky G; Fedorov V, Kubyshkin V, Kotchatkov A. Pancreatic head cancer: Accuracy of CT in determination of resetability. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30: 488-500.

  8. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.

  9. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 340-349.

  10. Warshaw AL, Gu ZY, Wittemberg J, Walkman AC. Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 1990; 125: 230-233.

  11. Warshaw AL, Tepper JF, Shipley WU. Laparoscopy in the staging and planning of therapy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 1986; 151: 76-80.

  12. Jiménez RE, Warshaw AL, Fernández-Del Castillo C. Laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology in the staging of pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surg 2000; 135: 409-414.

  13. Jiménez RE, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW. Impact of laparoscopic staging in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 409-414.

  14. Tierney WM, Francis JR, Edchauer F. The accuracy of EUS and helical CT in the assessment of vascular invasion by peripapillary malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 182-188.

  15. Dewitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M. Comparison of endoscopy ultrasonography and ultidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 753-763.

  16. Legman E, Vignaux O, Dousset B. Pancreatic tumors comparison of dual –phase helical CT and endoscopy sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 1315-1322.

  17. Midwinte MJ, Beveridge CJ, Wildson JB. Correlation between spiral computed tomography. Endoscopic ultrasonography and findings at operation in pancreatic and ampullary tumors. Br J Sur 1999; 86: 189-194.

  18. Hunt GC, Faigel DO. Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: a review. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 232-237.

  19. Pisters PW, Lee JF, Vauyhey JN. Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 325-327.

  20. White R, Winston C, Gonnen M. Current utility of staging laparoscopy for pancreatic and peripancreatic neoplasm. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 445-560.

  21. Schieman MC, Ho HS, Bold RJ. Utility of tumor markers in determining resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 061-955.

  22. Karachristos A, Scameas N Hoffman JP. Ca 19-9 levels predict results of staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1286-1292.

  23. Katz MH, Savides TJ, Moosa AR, Bouvert M. Evidence based approach to the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 200, 5: 576-590.

  24. Makary MA, Warshaw AL, Centeno RA. Implications of peritoneal cytology for pancreatic cancer management. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 361-365.

  25. Mcmahon PM, Halpern EF, Fernández CC. Pancreatic cancer: cost –effectiveness of imaging technology for assessing resectability. Radiology 2001; 221: 93-106.

  26. Thompson BN, Parks RW, Redhead DN. Refining the role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the staging of presumed pancreatic head and ampullary tumors. Br J Cancer 2006; 94: 213-217.

  27. Liu RC, Traverso LW. Diagnostic laparoscopy improves staging of pancreatic cancer deemed locally unresectable by computed tomography. Surg Endosc 2005: 638-642.

  28. Friess H, Kleff J, Silva JC. The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in pancreatic and periampullary malignancies. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 186: 675-682.

  29. Barreiro JC, Lillemoe KD, Koniaris LG. Diagnostic laparoscopy for periampullary and pancreatic cancer. What is the trae Benedit? J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 75-81.

  30. Stefanidis D, Grove KD, Schwesinger WH, Thomas CR. The current role of staging laparoscopy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas a review. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 189-199.

  31. Espat NJ, Brenan MI, Condon KC. Patients with laparoscopically staged unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma do not require subsequent surgical biliary or gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188: 649-655.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2009;10