medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2009; 10 (1)

Substitution of two assistant ports in anti-reflux laparoscopic surgery

Dávila ÁF, Gutiérrez RL, Jesús SR, Dávila ÁU, Lemus AJ, Montero PJJ, Dávila ZMR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 13-17
PDF size: 209.27 Kb.


Key words:

Minilaparoscopy, antireflux surgery, laparoscopic surgery.

ABSTRACT

We present an antireflux surgery technique that replaces 2 ports of attendance as an alternative to the traditional laparoscopic technique, in order to improve aesthetic results and to diminish the risk to go unnoticed hepatic damage with the use of a retractor. From July 2004 to February 2005, 6 patients were operated of antireflux surgery, with an age between 11 to 65 years, using only 3 ports (1 umbilical port of 11 or 5 mm and 2 ports of attendance of 5 mm or 3.5 mm), with a surgical time average of 65 minutes. The port assigned for the hepatic retractor was replaced by a hook-needle and the port used for traction of the gastroesophagus junction, was replaced, as well, by a peridural catheter introduced by a Tuohy needle to abdominal cavity. The viability of the procedure was analyzed with respect to the traditional laparoscopic technique. The procedure was carried out in the 6 patients consecutively. The aesthetic aspect was improved when eliminating 2 ports of attendance, appropriate surgical exposure, lessen hepatic trauma, and decrease of costs being execute without using the conventional hepatic retractor. There was no conversion to traditional laparoscopic technique. At eliminating 2 ports of attendance, besides the improvement in the aesthetic aspect, was obtained greater amplitude of the operating field, lessen hepatic trauma and decrease of costs. It requires training in the use of percutaneous needles.


REFERENCES

  1. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, Markiewicz S, Lombard R. Laparoscopic Nissen funduplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endos 1991; 1: 138-143.

  2. Cushiere A. Hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis. In: Hunter J, Sackier J, eds. Minimally invasive surgery. Mc Graw-Hill 1993: 87-111.

  3. Melgoza C, Hesiquio R, Lasky D, Schenk L, Hidalgo F. Funduplicatura laparoscópica con trócares de 5 mm. ¿Evita las hernias postincisionales? Cirujano General 2001; 23: 33-35.

  4. Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu MO, Poulin EC. Needlescopic surgery. A logical evolution from conventional laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1208-12.

  5. Pace DE, Chiasson PM, Schlachta CM, Poulin EC, Boutros Y, Mamazza J. Needlescopic funduplication. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 578-580.

  6. Pohl D, Eubanks T, Pellegrini C. Management and outcome of complications after laparoscopic antirreflux operations. Archives of Surgery 2001; 136: 399-404.

  7. Firdozmand E, Ritter M, Cohen R, Peter J. Ventricular laceration and cardiac tamponade during laparoscopic Nissen funduplication. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996; 6: 394-7.

  8. Yeung H, Ng W. A simple and useful method for retracting the left liver lobe. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 1131-1132.

  9. Yassa NA, Peters JH. CT of local hepatic injury due to surgical retractor. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 599-602.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2009;10