medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2009, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2009; 31 (3)

Total laparoscopic proctocolectomy with colonic 'J' pouch reconstruction in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis

González QH, Castañeda AR, Mejía OR, Yamamoto- Furusho JK, Uscanga LF
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 164-168
PDF size: 42.90 Kb.


Key words:

Proctocolectomy, ulcerative colitis, laparoscopy.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To determine if the laparoscopic approach for total proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with chronic idiopathic ulcerative colitis (CIUC) has a lower risk of short term postoperative complications and to evaluate the surgical time. Setting: National institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition "Salvador Zubirán". Third level health care center. Design: Prospective, observational, descriptive study. Statistical analysis: Percentages as summary measure for qualitative variables and central tendency measures. Patients and methods: Fifteen patients with CIUC subjected to total laparoscopic proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis during the period from June 2005 to March 2008. Studied variables were: age, gender, indication for surgery, immunosupressive therapy, surgical time, blood loss, conversion, complications, re-intervention, re-admittance. Results: Age, 32 years (19-68). Indications for surgery: in 10 (66.6%) failure of medical treatment, 3 (20%) intolerance to medical treatment, and 2 (13.3%) toxic colitis. In 13 patients (86.6%) the procedure was performed in two times and in two patients in three times. All patients were managed with loop ileostomy for protection. In 13 patients (86.6%) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed with double stappling and in two (13.3%) the procedure was performed manually because stapplers failed; this was considered as surgical complication. Surgical time was 180 min (120- 240). Surgical bleeding was 90 ml (10-200). Postoperative ileus occurred in the first surgical time and another occurred when closing a diverting ileostomy, and a pulmonary thromboembolism. Mean time to start oral feeding was of 3 days (2-4). The mean in-hospital stay was of 5 days (3-8). Conclusions: Complications were similar to those reported in other series of the same or larger size. Surgical time was lower than previously reported.


REFERENCES

  1. Martel G, Boushey RP. Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future. Surg Clin North Am 2006; 86: 867-97.

  2. Kozol RA, Hyman N, Strong S, Whelan RL, Cha C. Longo WE. Minimizing risk in colon and rectal surgery. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 576-87.

  3. Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R, Cella C, Frame D, Linz H, et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 291-307.

  4. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1800-7.

  5. Gorfine SR, Gelernt IM, Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Kreel I. Restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 188-94.

  6. Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Baba H, Nishibori H, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002; 12: 403-6.

  7. Casillas S, Delaney CP. Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Surg 2005; 22: 135-42.

  8. Delaney CP, Fazio VW. Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. Surg Clin North Am 2001; 81: 137-58.

  9. Larson D, Dozois E, Piotrowicz K. Laparoscopic assisted vs open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1845-50.

  10. Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Schlachta CM, Caddedu MO, Mammazza J. Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 837-42.

  11. Gunnarsson U, Karlbom U, Docker M, Raab Y, Påhlman L. Proctocolectomy and pelvic pouch—is a diverting stoma dangerous for the patient? Colorectal Dis 2004; 6:23-7.

  12. Larson DW, Davies MM, Dozois EJ, Cima RR, Piotrowicz K, Anderson K, et al. Sexual function, body image, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2008, 51: 392-6.

  13. Takahashi T, Ponce de León S, Cárdenas S, Remes JM, García-Osogobio S, Camilo Barreto J, et al. Quality of life after ileo-anal anastomosis. Rev Invest Clin 2002; 54: 397-402.

  14. Rotholtz NA, Aued ML, Lencinas SM, Zanoni G, Laponte M, Bun N, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted proctocolectomy using complete intracorporeal dissection. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1303-8.

  15. Brown SR, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Consecutive series of laparoscopic-assisted vs minilaparotomy restorative proctocolectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 41: 397-400.

  16. Kessler H, Hohenberger W. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 166.

  17. Hasegawa S, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama H, Hata H, Yamaguchi T, et al. Laparoscopic restorative total proctocolectomy with mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1152-6.

  18. López-Rosales F, González-Contreras Q, Muro JL, Berber MM, de León HT, Fernández OV, et al. Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: initial experience in Mexico. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 2304-7.

  19. Polle SM, Dunker MS, Slors JE, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1301-7.

  20. Agha A, Moser C, Iesalnieks I, Piso P, Schlitt HJ. Combination of hand-assisted and laparoscopic proctocolectomy (HALP): Technical aspects, learning curve and early postoperative results. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1547-52.

  21. González-Contreras Q, Moreno-Berber J, Jonjiguitud-Muro L, Tapia Cid-de León H, Vergara-Fernández O, López-Rosales F, et al. Cien procedimientos colorrectales laparoscópicos asistidos, experiencia en el Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Rev Asoc Mex Cir Endoc 2007; 8: 73-78.

  22. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 984-92.

  23. McNevin MS, Bax T, MacFarlane M, Moore M, Nye S, Clyde C, et al. Outcomes of a laparoscopic approach for total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy. Am Jou Surg 2006; 191: 673-6.

  24. Wexner SD, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, Bernstein M, Geron N. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 133-6.

  25. Rivadeneira DE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LG, Murray JJ, Coller JA, et al. Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1371-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2009;31