medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2010; 32 (1)

Acuscopic cholecystectomy with 10 mm, 5 mm ports and percutaneous reins. Experience and description of the technique

Vargas ÁAL, Cervantes RC, Palacio VF, Ayala AM, Castro MA, Galicia GT
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 29-33
PDF size: 187.01 Kb.


Key words:

Cholecystectomy, acuscopic.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To present and alternative to the percutaneous reins technique in which, aiming at causing less trauma and an adequate exposure, we substituted the laparoscopic needles, using instead 0.4 mm polyamide sutures as third port and as material to ligate the cystic conduct and the cystic artery.
Setting: Regional Hospital “General Ignacio Zaragoza”.
Design: Longitudinal, prospective, and descriptive study.
Statistical analysis: Percentages as summary measure for qualitative variables.
Material and methods: Thirty patients with vesicular litiasis programed electively for acuscopic cholecystectomy. The analyzed variables were age, gender, surgical time, in-hospital stay, complications, frequency of conversion to three-port surgery or to conventional surgery, postoperative pain, cosmetic result, cost.
Results: We studied 30 patients, 22 women and 8 men, average age was of 44.3 years, surgical time was of 53 min, post-surgery inhospital stay was of 2.5 days, no conversion to three-port surgery had to be made, 25 patients referred absence of pain at 24 h post-surgery, and the cosmetic result was better.
Conclusion: The proposed modification has the advantage of saving the third port and because of the low cost of the polyamide material it is easily reproducible in any hospital having laparoscopic equipment.


REFERENCES

  1. Pekolj J, Mazza O, Arbues G, Zas I, Sívori JA, Santibañes E. Colecistectomía acuscópica. Rev Argent Cir 1999; 76: 89-93.

  2. Dávila ÁF, Montero PJJ, Dávila ÁU, Dávila ZMR, Lemus AJ, Sandoval RJ. Propuesta de unificación de criterios para la clasificación de la cirugía minilaparoscópica. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2004; 5: 90-8.

  3. Ramírez AFJ, Rodríguez SI. Técnica de colecistectomía acuscópica con 2 puertos: Experiencia y resultados. Cir Gen 2008; 30: 191-6.

  4. Dávila ÁF, Sandoval RJ, Montero PJJ, Dávila ÁU, Dávila ZMR, Alonso RJM, et al. Sustitución de puertos por agujas percutáneas en cirugía endoscópica. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2004; 5:172-8.

  5. Dávila ÁF, Sandoval RJ, Dávila ÁU, Dávila ZMR, Lemus AJ, Montero PJJ. Colecistectomía laparoscópica con puerto-instrumento de 3.5 mm. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2006; 7: 19-26.

  6. Dávila ÁF, Heredia JNM, Sandoval RJ, Dávila ÁU, Domínguez RVH, Lemus AJ. Colecistectomía laparoscópica tradicional con pinza multiusos. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2007; 8: 164-71.

  7. Reddick EJ. Historia de la colecistectomía laparoscópica. De dónde venimos, dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2001; 2: 36-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2010;32